Cited by 406Digital Education and SocietyEducational Technology in LearningEducation and Digital Technologies

The second educational revolution: rethinking education in the age of technology

Collins, A., Halverson, R.·2010·Journal of Computer Assisted Learning

Abstract

Abstract This paper drew upon a recent book (Rethinking Education in the Age of Technology) to summarize a number of prospects and challenges arising from the appropriation of digital technology into learning and educational practice. Tensions between traditional models of schooling and the affordances of digital media were noted, while the promise of these technologies for shaping a new system of education was reviewed. It was argued that new technology brings radical opportunities but also significant challenges. The urgency of seeking a coherent model for the future of education in a technological age was stressed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2729.2009.00339.x

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Digital technologies are essential teaching tools that contribute to the effectiveness of the learning process and foster interactive learning environments that enhance student motivation.

    “many researchers agree that digital technologies are essential teaching tools that contribute tothe effectiveness ofthe learning process and foster interactive learning environments that enhance student motivation”
  • There is a growing movement to use assessments to capture learning trajectories and processes, shifting assessment from a summative measure of performance to an ongoing formative measure that informs just-in-time support.

    “While assessments were used previously to measure the knowledge state of the learner, there is a growing movement to use assessments to capture learning trajectories and processes.Assessment shifts from being a summative measure of performance to an on going formative measure that informs just-in-time support (Collins & Halverson, 2010;Shute, 2011).”

    From Evolution and Revolution in Artificial Intelligence in Education (2016) · cites this paper as Collins & Halverson, 2010

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Collins, A., & Halverson, R.
Affiliations
  • Northwestern University (US)
  • University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
Corresponding author
Collins, A.
Venue
Journal of Computer Assisted Learning
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-01-12
Volume
26
Issue
1
Pages
18-27
ISSN
  • 0266-4909 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2729
OpenAlex
W2118087190
Cited by
406
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 36 · 2019: 31 · 2018: 31 · 2017: 27 · 2016: 25 · 2015: 34 · 2014: 31 · 2013: 33 · 2012: 20
FWCI
64.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Computer Assisted Learning (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Digital Education and Society
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Educational Technology in Learning
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Education and Digital Technologies
Keywords
educational technology, digital technology in education, future of education, digital media affordances, educational reform

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review