Cited by 232Literacy, Media, and EducationDigital Storytelling and EducationParticipatory Visual Research Methods

Youth, Technology, and DIY: Developing Participatory Competencies in Creative Media Production

Kafai, Yasmin B., Peppler, Kylie A.·2011·Review of Research in Education

Abstract

Traditionally, educational researchers and practitioners have focused on the development of youths' critical understanding of media as a key aspect of new media literacies. The 21 st Century media landscape suggests an extension of this traditional notion of literacy - an extension that sees creative designs, ethical considerations, and technical skills as part of youth's expressive and intellectual engagement with media as participatory competencies. These engagements with media are also part of a growing Do-It-Yourself, or DIY, movement involving arts, crafts, and new technologies. The purpose of this chapter is to provide a framework and a language for understanding the multiple DIY practices in which youth engage while producing media. In the review, we will first provide a historical overview of the shifting perspectives of two related fields—new media literacies and computer literacy —before outlining the general trends in DIY media cultures that see youth moving towards becoming content creators. We then introduce how a single framework allows us to consider different participatory competencies in DIY under one umbrella. Special attention will be given to the digital practices of remixing, reworking, and repurposing popular media among disadvantaged youth. We will conclude with considerations of equity, access, and participation in after-school settings and possible implications for K-12 education.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3102/0091732x10383211

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kafai, Y. B., & Peppler, K. A.
Affiliations
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
  • Indiana University (US)
Venue
Review of Research in Education
Published
2011-03
Volume
35
Issue
1
Pages
89-119
ISSN
  • 0091-732X (ISSN-L)
  • 1935-1038
OpenAlex
W2168761256
Cited by
232
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 2
FWCI
199.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Review of Research in Education (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Science Foundation
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Literacy, Media, and Education
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › Digital Storytelling and Education
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Participatory Visual Research Methods
Keywords
youth, DIY culture, new media literacy, media production, remix, disadvantaged youth, computer literacy, content creation, after-school programs, K-12 education, access and equity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review