Cited by 253Education, Achievement, and GiftednessMotivation and Self-Concept in SportsStudent Assessment and Feedback

Performance-approach goals: good or bad forms of regulation?

Elliot, Andrew J., Moller, Arlen C.·2003·International Journal of Educational Research

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijer.2004.06.003

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Performance-approach goals have been positively linked to challenge construal, performance aspirations, performance, and self-esteem.

    “performance-approach goals have been positively linked to challenge construal, performance aspirations, performance, and self-esteem (Elliot & Moller, 2003).”
  • Normative evaluations engender a preoccupation with performance concerns.

    “normative evaluations engender a preoccupation with performance concerns (Butler, 1987, 2006; Elliot, 1999; Elliot & Moller, 2003; Harter, 1978; Kluger & DeNisi, 1996; Nicholls, 1984).”
  • Normative evaluation structures in the school and classroom environment tend to evoke performance-approach goals.

    “it is 'the normative evaluation structures in the school and classroom environment that tend to evoke performance-approach goals,'”
  • Social comparison of grades provides additional and more accurately diagnostic competence information than a task-focused evaluation standard and is commonly used by students to situate themselves even in classrooms that promote criterion-based grading.

    “social comparison of grades provides additional and more accurately diagnostic competence information than that provided by a task-focused evaluation standard and, as such, is commonly used by students to situate themselves even in classrooms that promote criterion-based grading.”
  • Grading has been shown to provoke challenge avoidance, as have performance-avoidance goals, whereas performance-approach goals are related to challenge construal.

    “First, although grading has been shown to provoke challenge avoidance (Harter, 1978), as have performance-avoidance goals (McGregor &Elliot, 2002), performance-approach goals are related with challenge construal (Elliot & Moller, 2003).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Elliot, A. J., & Moller, A. C.
Affiliations
University of Rochester (US)
Corresponding author
Elliot, Andrew J.
Venue
International Journal of Educational Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2003-01
Volume
39
Issue
4-5
Pages
339-356
ISSN
0883-0355 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2162246048
Cited by
253
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 19
FWCI
5.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International Journal of Educational Research (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports
  • Social Sciences › Education › Student Assessment and Feedback
Keywords
performance-approach goals, achievement goals, goal regulation, metatheory, values and beliefs, educational psychology, achievement motivation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review