Effects of personalized approach on fourth-grade students’ academic performance in project-based learning
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Lin et al. (2025) noted that the duration of experimental interventions may relate to variations in learning outcomes.
“Lin et al. (2025) also noted that the duration of experimental interventions may relate to variations in learning outcomes.”
From Can project-based learning improve students’ mathematics learning outcomes: a three-level meta-analysis (2026) · cites this paper as Lin et al. (2025)
Cites
HMELO-SILVER, C. E., DUNCAN, R. G., & CHINN, C. A. (2007) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1080/00461520701263368 · Cited by 2,641 · see citing works
Effects of Problem-Based Learning: A Meta-Analysis From the Angle of Assessment
Gijbels, D., Dochy, F., Van den Bossche, P., & Segers, M. (2005) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/00346543075001027 · Cited by 917 · see citing works
Han, S., Capraro, R., & Capraro, M. M. (2015) · International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education · doi:10.1007/s10763-014-9526-0 · Cited by 496 · see citing works
A study of the impact of project-based learning on student learning effects: a meta-analysis study
Zhang, L., & Ma, Y. (2023) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1202728 · Cited by 455 · see citing works
Self-citationWalkington, C. A. (2013) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0031882 · Cited by 322 · see citing works
Enhancing student motivation and engagement: The effects of a multidimensional intervention
Martin, A. J. (2008) · Contemporary Educational Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2006.11.003 · Cited by 293 · see citing works
Exploring the effects of project-based learning in secondary mathematics education
Holmes, V.-L., & Hwang, Y. (2016) · The Journal of Educational Research · doi:10.1080/00220671.2014.979911 · Cited by 172 · see citing works
Literature Review of Project-based Learning
(2022) · Journal of Educational Research and Policies · doi:10.53469/jerp.2022.04(07).23 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Wang, C., Zhang, W., & Cheng, J. (2026) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1868415
- Authors
- Lin, L., Zhang, H., Dong, Y., Lin, Z., Ma, Y., & Wang, J.
- Affiliations
- Shanghai Normal University (CN)
- Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Lin, Lin
- Dong, Yuqi
- Venue
- International Journal of Educational Research
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2025
- Volume
- 131
- Pages
- 102570
- ISSN
- 0883-0355 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4408031950
- Cited by
- 4
- References
- 8
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 1
- FWCI
- 12.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- International Journal of Educational Research (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China Humanities and Social Sciences Youth Foundation (22YJC880038)
- Innovative Research Team of High-level Local Universities in Shanghai
- Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Problem and Project Based Learning
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
- Social Sciences › Education › Student Assessment and Feedback
- Keywords
- academic performance, fourth grade, prior knowledge, two-tier diagnostic test, personalized learning content, student performance gaps, primary education, prior knowledge level
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review