Cited by 4Problem and Project Based LearningInnovative Teaching and Learning MethodsStudent Assessment and Feedback

Effects of personalized approach on fourth-grade students’ academic performance in project-based learning

Lin, Lin, Zhang, Huilun, Dong, Yuqi, Lin, Zhuonan, Ma, Yaqin, Wang, Jun·2025·International Journal of Educational Research

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijer.2025.102570

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Authors
Lin, L., Zhang, H., Dong, Y., Lin, Z., Ma, Y., & Wang, J.
Affiliations
  • Shanghai Normal University (CN)
  • Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Lin, Lin
  • Dong, Yuqi
Venue
International Journal of Educational Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2025
Volume
131
Pages
102570
ISSN
0883-0355 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4408031950
Cited by
4
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1
FWCI
12.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International Journal of Educational Research (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China Humanities and Social Sciences Youth Foundation (22YJC880038)
  • Innovative Research Team of High-level Local Universities in Shanghai
  • Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Problem and Project Based Learning
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
  • Social Sciences › Education › Student Assessment and Feedback
Keywords
academic performance, fourth grade, prior knowledge, two-tier diagnostic test, personalized learning content, student performance gaps, primary education, prior knowledge level

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review