Cited by 293Education, Achievement, and GiftednessMotivation and Self-Concept in SportsInnovative Teaching and Learning Methods

Enhancing student motivation and engagement: The effects of a multidimensional intervention

Martin, Andrew J.·2008·Contemporary Educational Psychology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2006.11.003

Cites

94 of 94 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

6 of the 100 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Martin, A. J.
Affiliations
The University of Sydney (AU)
Corresponding author
Martin, Andrew J.
Venue
Contemporary Educational Psychology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-04
Volume
33
Issue
2
Pages
239-269
ISSN
0361-476X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2017680214
Cited by
293
References
100
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 23 · 2012: 13
FWCI
12.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Contemporary Educational Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
Keywords
student motivation, student engagement, high school students, task management, persistence, mastery orientation, self-handicapping, failure prevention, risk and protective factors, youth development

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review