Cited by 93Probiotics and Fermented FoodsGut microbiota and healthFermentation and Sensory Analysis

Zooming into food-associated microbial consortia: a “cultural” evolution

Open access
Cocolin, Luca, Ercolini, Danilo·2015·Current Opinion in Food Science

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cofs.2015.01.003

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cocolin, L., & Ercolini, D.
Affiliations
  • University of Turin (IT)
  • University of Naples Federico II (IT)
Corresponding author
Ercolini, Danilo
Venue
Current Opinion in Food Science
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-04
Volume
2
Pages
43-50
ISSN
2214-7993 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2054249760
Cited by
93
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 8
FWCI
1.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Current Opinion in Food Science (publishedVersion)
  • Institutional Research Information System University of Turin (University of Turin) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Probiotics and Fermented Foods
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Fermentation and Sensory Analysis
Keywords
food microbiome, microbial consortia, culture-independent analysis, food fermentation, spoilage bacteria, foodborne pathogens

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review