Cited by 8Data Visualization and AnalyticsForecasting Techniques and ApplicationsStatistics Education and Methodologies

Visualizing uncertainty: On Soyer’s and Hogarth’s “The illusion of predictability: How regression statistics mislead experts”

Open access
Ziliak, Stephen T.·2012·International Journal of Forecasting

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijforecast.2012.02.004

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • S&H recommend visual presentation and Ziliak adds support.

    “S&H recommend visual presentation - and Ziliak (2012) adds support.”

    From Illusions in Regression Analysis (2011) · cites this paper as Ziliak (2012)

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 25 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ziliak, S. T.
Affiliations
Roosevelt University (US)
Corresponding author
Ziliak, Stephen T.
Venue
International Journal of Forecasting
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-07
Volume
28
Issue
3
Pages
712-714
ISSN
0169-2070 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3125624423
Cited by
8
References
25
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2012: 3
FWCI
1.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Forecasting (publishedVersion)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (acceptedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Data Visualization and Analytics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Forecasting Techniques and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistics Education and Methodologies
Keywords
graphing, R-squared, t-statistic, statistical significance testing, Karl Pearson

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review