The role of carbon capture and storage electricity in attaining 1.5 and 2 °C
Open accessThe claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Main drawbacks of carbon capture and storage include safety in relation to secured storage and the possibility of leakage.
“Some of the main drawbacks of carbon capture and storage include safety in relation to secured storage and the possibility of leakage.”
From Strategies for mitigation of climate change: a review (2020) · cites this paper as Vinca et al. 2018
Storage options for captured CO2 include depleted oil and gas fields, coal beds, and underground saline aquifers not used for potable water.
“Based on the literature, storage options include depleted oil and gas fields, coal beds and underground saline aquifers not used for potable water (Vinca et al. 2018).”
From Strategies for mitigation of climate change: a review (2020) · cites this paper as Vinca et al. 2018
Other issues related to carbon capture and storage include public acceptance and high deployment costs.
“Other issues related to this technology include public acceptance (Tcvetkov et al. 2019;Arning et al. 2019) as well as the high deployment costs associated (Vinca et al. 2018).”
From Strategies for mitigation of climate change: a review (2020) · cites this paper as Vinca et al. 2018
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
IPCC special report on carbon dioxide capture and storage
Metz, B., Davidson, O. R., de Coninck, H., Loos, M., & Meyer, L. (2021) · Cited by 4,875 · see citing works
Watson, R., Albritton, D. L., Barker, T., Baskmakov, I., Canziani, O. F., Christ, R., Ulrich Cubasch, B., Davidson, O., Gitay, H., Griggs, D., et al. (2001) · Cited by 3,473 · see citing works
An overview of current status of carbon dioxide capture and storage technologies
Leung, D. Y. C., Caramanna, G., & Maroto-Valer, M. M. (2014) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2014.07.093 · Cited by 3,198 · cited 1× · see citing works
“CCS potential lies mainly in the power sector, fossil fuels processing and industrial applications(Leung et al., 2014): a careful representation of demand structure all these sectors is therefore arguably recommended in a modeling exercise to provide meaningful results (Leeson et al.”
BackgroundIPCC Special Report on Renewable Energy Sources and Climate Change Mitigation
Revel, D. (2011) · OpenEdition (OpenEdition) · doi:10.58079/o8wx · Cited by 2,190 · see citing works
The cost of CO2 capture and storage
Rubin, E. S., Davison, J. E., & Herzog, H. J. (2015) · International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control · doi:10.1016/j.ijggc.2015.05.018 · Cited by 1,008 · see citing works
Meinshausen, M., Raper, S. C. B., & Wigley, T. M. L. (2011) · Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics · doi:10.5194/acp-11-1417-2011 · Cited by 876 · cited 1× · see citing works
“In order to have a more reliable estimate of the resulting temperature pathways, we take advantage of the soft link between WITCH and the MAGICC climate model (Meinshausen et al., 2011).”
MethodEnergy system transformations for limiting end-of-century warming to below 1.5 °C
Rogelj, J., Luderer, G., Pietzcker, R. C., Kriegler, E., Schaeffer, M., Krey, V., & Riahi, K. (2015) · Nature Climate Change · doi:10.1038/nclimate2572 · Cited by 875 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Zero or negative emissions technologies are supposed to be crucial in limiting the temperature increase to 1.5°C in the next decades (Rogelj et al., 2015).”
BackgroundInfluentialClimate change mitigation through livestock system transitions
Havlík, P., Valin, H., Herrero, M., Obersteiner, M. H., Schmid, E., Rufino, M. C., Mosnier, A., Thornton, P. K., Böttcher, H., Conant, R. T., et al. (2014) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1308044111 · Cited by 639 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Land-use is modelled in WITCH by the mean response functions produced by the Global Biosphere Management Model (GLOBIOM) land-use model (Havlík et al., 2014).”
MethodA review of learning rates for electricity supply technologies
Rubin, E. S., Azevedo, I. L., Jaramillo, P., & Yeh, S. (2015) · Energy Policy · doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2015.06.011 · Cited by 607 · cited 3× · see citing works
“Table 7: Transport costs on a common basis for onshore and offshore pipelines at three different capacities [$/tCO2/250km] (Rubin et al., 2015).”
High efficiency electric power generation: The environmental role
Beer, J. M. (2006) · Progress in Energy and Combustion Science · doi:10.1016/j.pecs.2006.08.002 · Cited by 581 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Natural gas combined cycle plants usually have higher efficiency and lower investment cost compared to coal plants (Beér, 2007).”
BackgroundLeeson, D., Dowell, N. M., Shah, N., Petit, C., & Fennell, P. S. (2017) · International journal of greenhouse gas control · doi:10.1016/j.ijggc.2017.03.020 · Cited by 566 · cited 1× · see citing works
“, 2014): a careful representation of demand structure all these sectors is therefore arguably recommended in a modeling exercise to provide meaningful results (Leeson et al., 2017; Muratori et al., 2017).”
BackgroundMcCoy, S., & Rubin, E. S. (2007) · International journal of greenhouse gas control · doi:10.1016/s1750-5836(07)00119-3 · Cited by 396 · cited 1× · see citing works
“CO2 transportation costs via pipeline are mainly related to the infrastructure costs, followed by costs of allowances, surveillance and expert supervision (McCoy and Rubin, 2008).”
BackgroundKey World Energy Statistics 2016
International Energy Agency (2016) · Key world energy statistics ... · doi:10.1787/key_energ_stat-2016-en · Cited by 387 · see citing works
Neij, L. (2008) · Energy Policy · doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2008.02.029 · Cited by 368 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Sources (Neij, 2008; Kaltschmitt et al., 2007) plant LR [%] Icost [$/kW] Capacity Factor [%] elpv 17% 4650 26% elcsp 10% 6120 41% elwindon 10% 1470 20% elwindoff 13% 2640 36%”
MethodBiomass-based negative emissions difficult to reconcile with planetary boundaries
Heck, V., Gerten, D., Lucht, W., & Popp, A. (2018) · Nature Climate Change · doi:10.1038/s41558-017-0064-y · Cited by 334 · cited 1× · see citing works
“The magnitude we obtain is in line with assumptions and results from (Heck et al., 2018; Mander et al., 2017).”
ResultTechnology Roadmap: Carbon Capture and Storage
International Energy Agency (2009) · IEA technology roadmaps · doi:10.1787/9789264088122-en · Cited by 324 · see citing works
Biomass and carbon dioxide capture and storage: A review
Kemper, J. (2015) · International journal of greenhouse gas control · doi:10.1016/j.ijggc.2015.06.012 · Cited by 321 · cited 1× · see citing works
“CCS can be coupled with both fossil fuels and biomass (Bio CCS): if coupled with biomass, a negative emission level can be achieved (Kemper, 2015; IEAGHG, 2014a; Chum et al., 2011).”
BackgroundUse of experience curves to estimate the future cost of power plants with CO2 capture
Rubin, E. S., Yeh, S., Antes, M., Berkenpas, M. B., & Davison, J. (2007) · International journal of greenhouse gas control · doi:10.1016/s1750-5836(07)00016-3 · Cited by 288 · cited 1× · see citing works
“This approach is functional for young technologies such as CCS power plants that lack empirical data (Wu et al., 2016; Li et al., 2012; Neij, 2008; Rubin et al., 2007).”
MethodCost and Performance of Carbon Dioxide Capture from Power Generation
Finkenrath, M. (2011) · IEA energy papers · doi:10.1787/5kgggn8wk05l-en · Cited by 247 · see citing works
Getting from here to there – energy technology transformation pathways in the EMF27 scenarios
Krey, V., Luderer, G., Clarke, L., & Kriegler, E. (2013) · Climatic Change · doi:10.1007/s10584-013-0947-5 · Cited by 247 · see citing works
Jamasb, T. (2007) · The Energy Journal · doi:10.5547/issn0195-6574-ej-vol28-no3-4 · Cited by 245 · cited 1× · see citing works
“One of the most diffused mathematical method for endogenously representing this phenomenon is through learning curves (Rubin et al., 2015; Jamasb, 2007).”
MethodLuderer, G., Bosetti, V., Jakob, M., Leimbach, M., Steckel, J. C., Waisman, H., & Edenhofer, O. (2011) · Climatic Change · doi:10.1007/s10584-011-0105-x · Cited by 216 · cited 1× · see citing works
“potential in the 2°C scenario resulting from different Integrated Assessment Models, including WITCH (Luderer et al., 2012).”
MethodJohnson, N., Krey, V., McCollum, D. L., Rao, S., Riahi, K., & Rogelj, J. (2014) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2014.02.028 · Cited by 189 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Retrofitting traditional plants to operate with CCS could therefore represent in some cases a cost effective alternative to a full replacement with lower carbon options (Gibbins et al., 2011; Johnson et al., 2015), despite the additional cost and the efficiency loss drawbacks.”
BackgroundMeinshausen, M. A., Wigley, T. M. L., & Raper, S. C. B. (2011) · Atmospheric chemistry and physics · doi:10.5194/acp-11-1457-2011 · Cited by 179 · see citing works
CO2 storage in depleted oil fields: The worldwide potential for carbon dioxide enhanced oil recovery
Godec, M., Kuuskraa, V. A., Leeuwen, T. V., Melzer, L. S., & Wildgust, N. (2011) · Energy Procedia · doi:10.1016/j.egypro.2011.02.102 · Cited by 176 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Particularly in the United States, CO2 from natural sources has been injected for decades into expiring oil fields for enhancing the extraction (IEA, 2015; Godec et al., 2011).”
BackgroundGlobal economic consequences of deploying bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS)
Muratori, M., Calvin, K., Wise, M., Kyle, P. G., & Edmonds, J. (2016) · Environmental Research Letters · doi:10.1088/1748-9326/11/9/095004 · Cited by 137 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Uncertainty concerning socioeconomic impact of large scale CCS deployment complicate the issue even more (Muratori et al., 2016; Creutzig et al., 2013).”
BackgroundResultAssessment of wind and solar power in global low-carbon energy scenarios: An introduction
Luderer, G., Pietzcker, R., Carrara, S., de Boer, H. S., Fujimori, S., Johnson, N., Mima, S., & Arent, D. J. (2017) · Energy Economics · doi:10.1016/j.eneco.2017.03.027 · Cited by 128 · cited 1× · see citing works
“As can be noticed from other studies, assumptions in WITCH related to biomass and other renewables lead to scenario with high use of solar and wind as mitigation technologies (Luderer et al., 2017).”
ResultKoelbl, B. S., van den Broek, M. A., Faaij, A. P. C., & van Vuuren, D. P. (2014) · Climatic Change · doi:10.1007/s10584-013-1050-7 · Cited by 117 · see citing works
Bauer, N., Bosetti, V., Hamdi-Chérif, M., Kitous, A., McCollum, D. L., Méjean, A., Rao, S., Turton, H., Paroussos, L., Ashina, S., et al. (2013) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2013.09.009 · Cited by 100 · cited 1× · see citing works
“5°C would increase competition among CCS technologies: this aspect could hinder fossil fuel based CCS deployment, encouraging a shift towards carbon neutral or carbon negative options (Bauer et al., 2015; Van der Zwaan and Tavoni, 2011; De Cian and Tavoni, 2012).”
BackgroundCO2 Capture and Storage with Leakage in an Energy-Climate Model
van der Zwaan, B., & Smekens, K. (2007) · Environmental Modeling & Assessment · doi:10.1007/s10666-007-9125-3 · Cited by 94 · see citing works
Carbon capture and storage across fuels and sectors in energy system transformation pathways
Muratori, M., Kheshgi, H. S., Mignone, B. K., Clarke, L., McJeon, H. C., & Edmonds, J. (2016) · International journal of greenhouse gas control · doi:10.1016/j.ijggc.2016.11.026 · Cited by 90 · cited 1× · see citing works
“, 2014): a careful representation of demand structure all these sectors is therefore arguably recommended in a modeling exercise to provide meaningful results (Leeson et al., 2017; Muratori et al., 2017).”
BackgroundLi, S., Zhang, X., Gao, L., & Jin, H. (2012) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2011.12.046 · Cited by 80 · cited 1× · see citing works
“This approach is functional for young technologies such as CCS power plants that lack empirical data (Wu et al., 2016; Li et al., 2012; Neij, 2008; Rubin et al., 2007).”
MethodThe Politics of Large-scale CCS Deployment
Lipponen, J., McCulloch, S., Keeling, S., Stanley, T., Berghout, N., & Berly, T. (2017) · Energy Procedia · doi:10.1016/j.egypro.2017.03.1890 · Cited by 72 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Literature further claims that CCS large scale deployment is hardly achievable in the current policy scenario, which does not provide a stable and targeted support (Lipponen et al., 2017).”
BackgroundKoelbl, B. S., van den Broek, M. A., van Ruijven, B. J., Faaij, A. P. C., & van Vuuren, D. P. (2014) · International journal of greenhouse gas control · doi:10.1016/j.ijggc.2014.04.024 · Cited by 69 · cited 4× · see citing works
“Some multi model comparisons show that CCS might represent from 30% to 40% of the primary energy use (Koelbl et al., 2014), and biomass is likely to be the most used fuel combined with CCS, especially at the end of the century (Van Der Zwaan et al., 2013).”
BackgroundInfluentialWu, X., Yang, Q., Chen, G. Q., Hayat, T., & Alsaedi, A. (2016) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2016.03.015 · Cited by 69 · cited 1× · see citing works
“This approach is functional for young technologies such as CCS power plants that lack empirical data (Wu et al., 2016; Li et al., 2012; Neij, 2008; Rubin et al., 2007).”
Methodvan der Zwaan, B., Rösler, H., Kober, T., Aboumahboub, T., Calvin, K., Gernaat, D., Marangoni, G., & McCollum, D. L. (2013) · Climate Change Economics · doi:10.1142/s2010007813400137 · Cited by 66 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Some multi model comparisons show that CCS might represent from 30% to 40% of the primary energy use (Koelbl et al., 2014), and biomass is likely to be the most used fuel combined with CCS, especially at the end of the century (Van Der Zwaan et al., 2013).”
BackgroundSelf-citationImpact of international climate policies on CO2 capture and storage deployment
van den Broek, M. A., Veenendaal, P., Koutstaal, P. R., Turkenburg, W. C., & Faaij, A. P. C. (2011) · Energy Policy · doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2011.01.036 · Cited by 65 · see citing works
Creutzig, F., Corbera, E., Bolwig, S., & Hunsberger, C. (2013) · Environmental Research Letters · doi:10.1088/1748-9326/8/3/035047 · Cited by 55 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Uncertainty concerning socioeconomic impact of large scale CCS deployment complicate the issue even more (Muratori et al., 2016; Creutzig et al., 2013).”
BackgroundSocio-economic Aspects of CCS Technologies
Karayannis, V., Charalampides, G., & Lakioti, E. (2014) · Procedia Economics and Finance · doi:10.1016/s2212-5671(14)00716-3 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
An examination of geologic carbon sequestration policies in the context of leakage potential
Bielicki, J. M., Peters, C. A., Fitts, J. P., & Wilson, E. J. (2015) · International journal of greenhouse gas control · doi:10.1016/j.ijggc.2015.02.023 · Cited by 47 · cited 1× · see citing works
“However, given the high uncertainty related to leakage estimates and sites monitoring (Bielicki et al., 2015), the Authors explored the implications of leakage and its uncertainty in a different study, under the same modelling framework used in this research (Vinca et al.”
MethodBearing the Cost of Stored Carbon Leakage
Vinca, A., Emmerling, J., & Tavoni, M. (2018) · Frontiers in Energy Research · doi:10.3389/fenrg.2018.00040 · Cited by 39 · cited 1× · see citing works
“, 2015), the Authors explored the implications of leakage and its uncertainty in a different study, under the same modelling framework used in this research (Vinca et al., 2018).”
MethodSelf-citationMander, S., Anderson, K., Larkin, A., Gough, C., & Vaughan, N. (2017) · Energy Procedia · doi:10.1016/j.egypro.2017.03.1739 · Cited by 33 · cited 1× · see citing works
“The magnitude we obtain is in line with assumptions and results from (Heck et al., 2018; Mander et al., 2017).”
ResultRetrofitting CO2 Capture to Existing Power Plants
Gibbins, J., Chalmers, H., Lucquiaud, M., McGlashan, N. R., Li, J., & Liang, X. (2011) · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Catalanotti, E., Hughes, K. J., Porter, R., Price, J., & Pourkashanian, M. M. (2013) · Environmental Progress & Sustainable Energy · doi:10.1002/ep.11894 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Cian, E. D., & Tavoni, M. (2011) · Environmental Modeling & Assessment · doi:10.1007/s10666-011-9279-x · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Self-citationTechno-economic assessment of CO2 capture retrofit to existing power plants
Gibbins, J., Chalmers, H., Lucquiaud, M., Li, J., McGlashan, N. R., Liang, X., & Davison, J. (2011) · Energy Procedia · doi:10.1016/j.egypro.2011.02.061 · Cited by 19 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Retrofitting traditional plants to operate with CCS could therefore represent in some cases a cost effective alternative to a full replacement with lower carbon options (Gibbins et al., 2011; Johnson et al., 2015), despite the additional cost and the efficiency loss drawbacks.”
Cost and Performance of PC and IGCC Plants for a Range of Carbon Dioxide Capture - Rev. 1
Gerdes, K., USDOE Office of Fossil Energy (FE), Black, J., Haslback, J., Jones, A., Lundberg, W., Shah, V., Kyle, A., & Lewis, E. G. (2013) · doi:10.2172/1513270 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Cost and Performance of PC and IGCC Plants for a Range of Carbon Dioxide Capture - Original
Gerdes, K., USDOE Office of Fossil Energy (FE), Black, J., Haslbeck, J., Jones, A., Lundberg, W., Shah, V., Kyle, A., & Lewis, E. G. (2011) · doi:10.2172/1515274 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Koelbl, B. S., van den Broek, M. A., van Ruijven, B. J., van Vuuren, D. P., & Faaij, A. P. C. (2013) · Energy Procedia · doi:10.1016/j.egypro.2013.06.697 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Marin, G., & Vona, F. (2017) · AgEcon Search (University of Minnesota, USA) · doi:10.22004/ag.econ.266284 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
The Value of CCS under Current Policy Scenarios: NDCs and Beyond
Davidson, C. L., Dahowski, R. T., McJeon, H. C., Clarke, L., Iyer, G. C., & Muratori, M. (2017) · Energy Procedia · doi:10.1016/j.egypro.2017.03.1885 · Cited by 7 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Furthermore, literature suggests that CCS availability in the technology portfolio could be associated with remarkable cost savings, for a given mitigation target (Davidson et al., 2017).”
Backgroundvan der Zwaan, B., & Tavoni, M. (2011) · Energy Procedia · doi:10.1016/j.egypro.2011.02.581 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Self-citationLessons in the Development of Large-scale CO2 Storage Projects
Whittaker, S., & Kneppers, A. (2013) · Energy Procedia · doi:10.1016/j.egypro.2013.06.258 · Cited by 4 · cited 1× · see citing works
“, 2005b), and in particular if large scale applications will make inroads in the electric sector (Whittaker and Kneppers, 2013).”
BackgroundCatalanotti, E., Hughes, K., Porter, R., et al. (2014) · UCL Discovery (University College London) · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Wilson, M. (2011) · Proceedings · doi:10.3997/2214-4609.20144725 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
2 of the 57 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Emmerling, J., L. Drouet, L. Reis, M. Bevione, L. Berger, V. Bosetti, S. Carrara, E. De Cian, G. de Maere d'Aertrycke, T. Longden, M. Malpede, G. Marangoni, F. Sferra, M. Tavoni, J. Witajewski-Baltvilks, and P. Havlík (2016). The WITCH 2016 Model -Documentation and Implementation of the Shared Socioeconomic Pathways. SSRN Scholarly Paper ID 2800970, Social Science Research Network, Rochester, NY.
- Kaltschmitt, M., W. Streicher, and A. Wiese (Eds.) (2007). Renewable Energy: Technology, Economics and Environment. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.
- Koelbl, B. S. (2016). Deployment potential and macro-economic impacts of carbon dioxide capture and storage in the future energy system. Dissertation. Universiteit Utrecht. http: //dspace.library.uu.nl/handle/1874/339521.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Strategies for mitigation of climate change: a review
Fawzy, S., Osman, A. I., Doran, J., & Rooney, D. W. (2020) · Environmental Chemistry Letters · doi:10.1007/s10311-020-01059-w · Cited by 1,522 · see citing works
Uncertain storage prospects create a conundrum for carbon capture and storage ambitions
Lane, J. L., Greig, C. R., & Garnett, A. (2021) · Nature Climate Change · doi:10.1038/s41558-021-01175-7 · Cited by 205 · see citing works
The value of CCUS in transitions to net-zero emissions
Greig, C. R., & Uden, S. (2021) · The Electricity Journal · doi:10.1016/j.tej.2021.107004 · Cited by 86 · see citing works
Zhang, S., Zhuang, Y., Liu, L., Zhang, L., & Du, J. (2020) · Computers & Chemical Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.compchemeng.2020.106885 · Cited by 70 · see citing works
Yang, L., Xu, M., Fan, J., Liang, X., Zhang, X., Lv, H., & Wang, D. (2021) · Energy Policy · doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2021.112562 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
Grant, N., Hawkes, A. D., Napp, T., & Gambhir, A. (2021) · One Earth · doi:10.1016/j.oneear.2021.10.024 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
Carminati, H. B., Milão, R. D. F. D., de Medeiros, J. L., & Araújo, O. D. Q. F. (2019) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.113633 · Cited by 61 · see citing works
Choi, G. H., Song, H. J., Lee, S. K., Kim, J., Moon, M., & Yoo, P. J. (2023) · Nano Energy · doi:10.1016/j.nanoen.2023.108512 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
Kang, J.-N., Wei, Y., Liu, L.-C., Han, R., Chen, H., Li, J., Wang, J.-W., & Yu, B. (2020) · International journal of greenhouse gas control · doi:10.1016/j.ijggc.2020.103149 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
OPTIMAL CLIMATE POLICY IN 3D: MITIGATION, CARBON REMOVAL, AND SOLAR GEOENGINEERING
Belaia, M., Moreno‐Cruz, J., & Keith, D. W. (2021) · Climate Change Economics · doi:10.1142/s2010007821500081 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
Wiesberg, I. L., de Medeiros, J. L., de Mello, R. V. P., Maia, J. G. S. S., Bastos, J. B. V., & Araújo, O. D. Q. F. (2021) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2021.111486 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Kai, L. Y., Sarip, S., Kaidi, H. M., Rey, J. A. A., Samsuddin, N. M., Muhtazaruddin, M. N., Muhammad‐Sukki, F., & Aziz, S. A. (2021) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2021.3088761 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
“5 C or 2 C by using low carbon alternative energy and reducing fossil fuel energy [31].”
BackgroundLiang, Y. H., Cai, L., Guan, Y., Liu, W., Xiang, Y., Li, J., & He, T. (2019) · Energy · doi:10.1016/j.energy.2019.116854 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Hiremath, M., Viebahn, P., & Samadi, S. (2021) · Energies · doi:10.3390/en14020262 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
“8% for operational expenditure [24,87], with the number of doublings dependent on the three coal-CCS deployment end-point scenarios in future in India (150 GW/80 GW/35 GW by 2050 as estimated in Section 3.”
BackgroundBaciocchi, R., & Costa, G. (2021) · Frontiers in Energy Research · doi:10.3389/fenrg.2021.592600 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
“, 2018); however, geological storage, already applied at scales of around 1 Mt CO2/y, is still facing concerns about storage sites, public acceptance, costs, and large-scale feasibility (Vinca et al., 2018).”
BackgroundInfluentialXiao, Y., Xu, H., & Zhao, C. Y. (2021) · International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer · doi:10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2021.105396 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
China’s power transition under the global 1.5 °C target: preliminary feasibility study and prospect
Xu, Y. H., Yang, K. M., & Yuan, J. (2020) · Environmental Science and Pollution Research · doi:10.1007/s11356-020-08085-9 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
A Techno-Economic Analysis of a Novel Solvent-Based Oxycombustion CO2 Capture Process
Cabral, R. P., Heldebrant, D. J., & Dowell, N. M. (2019) · Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research · doi:10.1021/acs.iecr.9b00305 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Hydrogenation of CO 2 into Value‐added Chemicals Using Solid‐Supported Catalysts
Aktary, M., Alghamdi, H. S., Ajeebi, A. M., Alzahrani, A. S., Sanhoob, M. A., Aziz, M. A., & Shaikh, M. N. (2024) · Chemistry - An Asian Journal · doi:10.1002/asia.202301007 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Zhou, Z., Fu, Y., Tan, L., & Cai, L. (2024) · International Journal of Hydrogen Energy · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2024.03.277 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Modeling the effect of budget allocation on the abatement of atmospheric carbon dioxide
MISRA, A. K., & Jha, A. (2022) · Computational and Applied Mathematics · doi:10.1007/s40314-022-01906-2 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
“Vinca et al. have discussed about the decarbonization techniques, and they have mentioned that the leakage risk and high cost associated with the deployment of CCS technology are some points of concern of decarbonization techniques (Vinca et al. 2018).”
BackgroundScenario Discovery Analysis of Drivers of Solar and Wind Energy Transitions Through 2050
Woodard, D., Snyder, A., Lamontagne, J., Tebaldi, C., Morris, J., Calvin, K., Binsted, M. T., & Patel, P. (2023) · Earth s Future · doi:10.1029/2022ef003442 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
An Oligopoly Game of CDR Strategy Deployment in a Steady-State Net-Zero Emission Climate Regime
Babonneau, F., Bahn, O., Haurie, A. B., & Marc Vielle, B. (2020) · Environmental Modeling & Assessment · doi:10.1007/s10666-020-09734-6 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Numerical study on sulfur-bearing natural gas oxy-fuel combustion power plant
Cai, L., Tan, L., Liang, Y. H., Yin, X., Liu, C., & Guan, Y. (2021) · Applied Thermal Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2021.117292 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Moore, C. C. S., Antunes, C. H., & Kulay, L. (2022) · International journal of greenhouse gas control · doi:10.1016/j.ijggc.2022.103606 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Oni, B. A., Oni, O. Y., Sunday, O., Ojo, V. O., & Odofin, O. L. (2025) · Green Technologies and Sustainability · doi:10.1016/j.grets.2025.100319 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Gotta Catch ’Em All: CCUS With endogenous technical change
Bazzana, D., Comincioli, N., Gusperti, C., Legrenzi, D., Rizzati, M. C. P., & Vergalli, S. (2025) · Resource and Energy Economics · doi:10.1016/j.reseneeco.2025.101499 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Global Warming and Atmospheric Carbon: Is Carbon Sequestration a Myth or Reality?
Ogwu, S. O., Eze, A. A., Uzoigwe, J. C., Orji, A., Maduka, A. C., & Onwe, J. C. (2023) · Studia Universitatis „Vasile Goldis” Arad – Economics Series · doi:10.2478/sues-2023-0002 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Kim, N. E., Basak, J. K., & Kim, H. T. (2023) · Atmosphere · doi:10.3390/atmos14020299 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Oxy-fuel Combustion Capture Technology
Cabral, R. P., & Dowell, N. M. (2019) · Royal Society of Chemistry eBooks · doi:10.1039/9781788012744-00168 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Wang, X., Peng, K., Du, G., Tian, H., & Shu, G. (2025) · Energy Conversion and Management · doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2025.119971 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Methods for R&D Portfolio Analysis and Evaluation (Workshop Report)
Bush, B., Hanes, R. J., Hunter, C., Hughes, C., Mann, M., Newes, E. K., Baldwin, S. F., Arent, D. J., Baker, E. D., Clarke, L., et al. (2020) · doi:10.2172/1660216 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Self-citationSpencer, T. C., McCaughey, J. W., Bresch, D. N., & Steffen, B. (2026) · Energy Research & Social Science · doi:10.1016/j.erss.2026.104746
- Authors
- Vinca, A., Rottoli, M., Marangoni, G., & Tavoni, M.
- Affiliations
- International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (AT)
- Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (DE)
- Pennsylvania State University (US)
- RFF-CMCC European Institute on Economics and the Environment (IT)
- Corresponding author
- Vinca, Adriano
- Venue
- International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-11
- Volume
- 78
- Pages
- 148-159
- ISSN
- 1750-5836 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2776403386
- Cited by
- 33
- References
- 57
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 4
- FWCI
- 7.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- ageconsearch.umn.edu
- Licence
- Locations
- International journal of greenhouse gas control (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- AgEcon Search (University of Minnesota, USA) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- IIASA PURE (International Institute of Applied Systems Analysis) (submittedVersion)
- Virtual Community of Pathological Anatomy (University of Castilla La Mancha) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Econstor (Econstor) (submittedVersion)
- Publication Database PIK (Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK)) (submittedVersion)
- AgEcon Search (University of Minnesota, USA)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Climate Change Policy and Economics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Integrated Energy Systems Optimization
- Keywords
- carbon capture and storage, electricity generation, 1.5°C target, 2°C target, Paris Agreement, climate change mitigation, renewable energy, techno-economic feasibility, cost uncertainty, technological progress, energy transition, WITCH model
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
