Cited by 97Preterm Birth and ChorioamnionitisInfant Development and Preterm CareMaternal and Perinatal Health Interventions

Predictors of preterm birth

Krupa, F.G., Faltin, D., Cecatti, J.G., Surita, F.G.C., Souza, J.P.·2006·International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics

Abstract

Objective: This is a systematic review to assess published scientific evidence on preterm birth predictors. Methods: An Internet search for predictors of preterm birth was performed and the evidence level of each method was evaluated. Results: There is strong evidence that preterm birth can be predicted using vaginal sonography to evaluate cervical characteristics, fetal fibronectin in cervicovaginal secretions and interleukin‐6 in amniotic fluid. There is consistent evidence that digital cervical examination is a weak predictor, and controversy regarding home uterine activity monitoring. There is scanty evidence about the predictive ability of maternal history and perceptions of symptoms since the study design fails to provide high evidence level. Conclusion: Cervical evaluation by vaginal sonography, fetal fibronectin and interleukin‐6 are the best methods for predicting preterm birth.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijgo.2006.03.022

Cites

68 of 68 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Vaginal bleeding caused by placental abruption or placenta preavia is associated with a very high risk of preterm delivery, and first- or second-trimester bleeding not associated with either is also associated with subsequent preterm birth.

    “Vaginal bleeding caused by placental abruption or placenta preavia is associated with a very high risk of preterm delivery, but bleeding in the first and second trimesters that is not associated with either placental abruption or placenta preavia is also associated with subsequent preterm birth.43”

    From Epidemiology and causes of preterm birth (2008) · cites this paper as [43]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Krupa, F. G., Faltin, D., Cecatti, J. G., Surita, F. G. C., & Souza, J. P.
Affiliations
  • Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) (BR)
  • University of Geneva (CH)
Corresponding author
Cecatti, J.G.
Venue
International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2006-05-24
Volume
94
Issue
1
Pages
5-11
ISSN
  • 0020-6695 (ISSN-L)
  • 0020-7292
  • 1879-3479
OpenAlex
W2127757901
Cited by
97
References
68
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 7
FWCI
0.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Preterm Birth and Chorioamnionitis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Infant Development and Preterm Care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
Keywords
preterm birth, preterm birth prediction, vaginal sonography, cervical length, fetal fibronectin, cervicovaginal secretions, interleukin-6, amniotic fluid, uterine activity monitoring, maternal history
MeSH terms
Amniotic Fluid, Female, Fetus, Fibronectins, Humans, Infant, Newborn, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Predictive Value of Tests, Pregnancy, Uterine Contraction, Uterus, Vagina, Interleukin-6, Ultrasonography, Prenatal, Monitoring, Ambulatory, Premature Birth

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review