Cited by 11Endometriosis Research and TreatmentGynecological conditions and treatmentsEctopic Pregnancy Diagnosis and Management

The efficacy of long‐term maintenance therapy with a levonorgestrel‐releasing intrauterine system for prevention of ovarian endometrioma recurrence

Kim, Mi‐La, Cho, Yeon Jean, Kim, Mi Kyoung, Jung, Yong Wook, Yun, Bo Seong, Seong, Seok Ju·2016·International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the cumulative recurrence rates of ovarian endometrioma among patients using a levonorgestrel‐releasing intrauterine system (LNG‐IUS) after conservative laparoscopic surgery. Methods: A retrospective review was conducted of premenopausal women who underwent conservative laparoscopic surgery for ovarian endometrioma and subsequent treatment with LNG‐IUS at two gynecologic surgery centers in South Korea between January 1, 2007, and September 30, 2014. Eligible patients had no residual ovarian lesions before LNG‐IUS insertion, underwent insertion within 12 months of primary surgery, and were followed up for at least 6 months afterwards. Recurrence was defined as a cystic mass (≥ 2 cm in diameter) detected by transvaginal ultrasonography. Results: Overall, 61 patients were included. The mean duration of follow‐up was 42.9 ± 22.0 months (range 8–98). Recurrence of ovarian endometrioma was detected among 7 (11%) of the patients. On Kaplan–Meier analysis, the cumulative recurrence rates were 4.0%, 6.3%, and 25.5% at 24, 36, and 60 months after surgery, respectively. In multivariate analysis, nulliparity at surgery was the only risk factor for recurrence (hazard ratio 5.892, 95% confidence interval 1.139–30.484; P = 0.034). Conclusion: Long‐term maintenance therapy with LNG‐IUS after conservative surgery might be a treatment option to consider to prevent ovarian endometrioma recurrence among premenopausal women.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijgo.2016.03.017

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kim, M., Cho, Y. J., Kim, M. K., Jung, Y. W., Yun, B. S., & Seong, S. J.
Affiliations
  • CHA University (KR)
  • Dong-A University Hospital (KR)
Corresponding author
Seong, Seok Ju
Venue
International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2016-09
Volume
134
Issue
3
Pages
256-259
ISSN
  • 0020-6695 (ISSN-L)
  • 0020-7292
  • 1879-3479
OpenAlex
W2416074282
Cited by
11
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1
FWCI
1.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Endometriosis Research and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gynecological conditions and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ectopic Pregnancy Diagnosis and Management
Keywords
endometrioma, levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system, recurrence prevention, maintenance therapy, laparoscopic conservative surgery, nulliparity, premenopausal women, endometriosis
MeSH terms
Adult, Combined Modality Therapy, Contraceptives, Oral, Combined, Drug Administration Schedule, Endometriosis, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Neoplasm Recurrence, Local, Ovarian Neoplasms, Retrospective Studies, Treatment Outcome, Levonorgestrel, Young Adult, Republic of Korea

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review