Cited by 134Endometriosis Research and TreatmentGynecological conditions and treatmentsEctopic Pregnancy Diagnosis and Management

Surgical management of endometriosis

Donnez, Jacques, Pirard, Céline, Smets, Mireille, Jadoul, Pascale, Squifflet, Jean·2004·Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology

Abstract

The efficacy of medical and surgical treatment of endometriosis-associated infertility and pelvic pain is a source of ongoing controversy. Complete resolution of endometriosis is not yet possible and current therapy has three main objectives: (1) to reduce pain; (2) to increase the possibility of pregnancy; and (3) to delay recurrence for as long as possible. It is possible that a consensus will never be reached on the optimal treatment of minimal and mild endometriosis. In case of moderate and severe endometriosis-associated infertility, the combined approach (operative laparoscopy with a gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist) should be considered as 'first-line' treatment. The mean pregnancy rate of 50% reported in the literature following surgery provides scientific proof that operative treatment should first be undertaken to give our patients the best chance of conceiving naturally. In case of rectovaginal adenomyotic nodules, surgery must be considered as first-line therapy, medical therapy being relatively in-efficacious.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2004.03.004

Cites

113 of 113 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • GnRH agonists excessively suppress E2 to less than 20 pg/mL, with related unfavorable side effects.

    “GnRH agonists are effective at treating endometriosis symptoms, but they have numerous limitations, including a delayed therapeutic impact because of the flare-up effect, excessive suppression of E2 to less than 20 pg/mL (with related unfavorable side effects), inability to titrate E2 levels, and unpredictable reversibility of treatment when injectable depot forms of GnRH agonists are used [95,96,”
  • GnRH agonists have a delayed therapeutic impact because of the flare-up effect.

    “GnRH agonists are effective at treating endometriosis symptoms, but they have numerous limitations, including a delayed therapeutic impact because of the flare-up effect, excessive suppression of E2 to less than 20 pg/mL (with related unfavorable side effects), inability to titrate E2 levels, and unpredictable reversibility of treatment when injectable depot forms of GnRH agonists are used [95,96,”
  • GnRH agonists cannot titrate E2 levels.

    “GnRH agonists are effective at treating endometriosis symptoms, but they have numerous limitations, including a delayed therapeutic impact because of the flare-up effect, excessive suppression of E2 to less than 20 pg/mL (with related unfavorable side effects), inability to titrate E2 levels, and unpredictable reversibility of treatment when injectable depot forms of GnRH agonists are used [95,96,”
  • The mechanism of GnRH antagonists differs from that of GnRH agonists, which after a first phase of stimulation desensitize GnRH receptors, leading to full suppression of LH and FSH production and complete suppression of E2 to levels similar to those after bilateral oophorectomy.

    “The mechanism is different from that of the GnRH agonist which, after a first phase of stimulation, desensitizes GnRH receptors, leading to full suppression of LH and FSH production and subsequently to complete suppression of E2 to levels similar to those observed after bilateral oophorectomy [95,96,97,98].”
  • GnRH agonists are effective at treating endometriosis symptoms.

    “GnRH agonists are effective at treating endometriosis symptoms, but they have numerous limitations, including a delayed therapeutic impact because of the flare-up effect, excessive suppression of E2 to less than 20 pg/mL (with related unfavorable side effects), inability to titrate E2 levels, and unpredictable reversibility of treatment when injectable depot forms of GnRH agonists are used [95,96,”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 114 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Donnez, J., Pirard, C., Smets, M., Jadoul, P., & Squifflet, J.
Affiliations
Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc (BE)
Corresponding author
Donnez, Jacques
Venue
Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2004-04
Volume
18
Issue
2
Pages
329-348
ISSN
1521-6934 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2106304510
Cited by
134
References
114
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 9
FWCI
1.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Access to Libraries (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Endometriosis Research and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gynecological conditions and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ectopic Pregnancy Diagnosis and Management
Keywords
endometriosis, surgical management, endometriosis-associated infertility, pelvic pain, laparoscopic surgery, GnRH agonist, pregnancy rate, recurrence
MeSH terms
Endometriosis, Female, Humans, Infertility, Female, Ovarian Diseases, Peritoneal Diseases, Laparoscopy, Retroperitoneal Space, Evidence-Based Medicine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review