Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 353

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

An overview of cathode material and catalysts suitable for generating hydrogen in microbial electrolysis cell

Kundu, Anirban, Sahu, Jaya Narayan, Redzwan, Ghufran, Hashim, M.A.·2013·International Journal of Hydrogen Energy

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.11.031

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 66

  1. Logan, 2008, Microbial electrolysis cells for high yield hydrogen gas production from organic matter, Environ Sci Technol, 42, 8630, 10.1021/es801553z · DOI · Paper page
  2. Berger E. BMW hydrogen near zero emission vehicle development. BMW Clean Energy CARB ZEV Technology Symposium 2006, p. 12.
  3. Wrana, 2010, Hydrogen gas production in a microbial electrolysis cell by electrohydrogenesis, J Cleaner Production, 18, S105, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2010.06.018 · DOI
  4. Bullen, 2006, Biofuel cells and their development, Biosens Bioelectron, 21, 2015, 10.1016/j.bios.2006.01.030 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Logan, 2006, Microbial fuel cells: methodology and technology, Environ Sci Technol, 40, 5181, 10.1021/es0605016 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Liu, 2005, Electrochemically assisted microbial production of hydrogen from acetate, Environ Sci Technol, 39, 4317, 10.1021/es050244p · DOI · Paper page
  7. Rozendal, 2006, Principle and perspectives of hydrogen production through biocatalyzed electrolysis, Int J Hydrogen Energy, 31, 1632, 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2005.12.006 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Liu, 2004, Electricity generation using an air-cathode single chamber microbial fuel cell in the presence and absence of a proton exchange membrane, Environ Sci Technol, 38, 4040, 10.1021/es0499344 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Liu, 2004, Production of electricity during wastewater treatment using a single chamber microbial fuel cell, Environ Sci Technol, 38, 2281, 10.1021/es034923g · DOI · Paper page
  10. Cheng, 2007, Sustainable and efficient biohydrogen production via electrohydrogenesis, Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 104, 18871, 10.1073/pnas.0706379104 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Ditzig, 2007, Production of hydrogen from domestic wastewater using a bioelectrochemically assisted microbial reactor (BEAMR), Int J Hydrogen Energy, 32, 2296, 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2007.02.035 · DOI
  12. Rozendal, 2007, Performance of single chamber biocatalyzed electrolysis with different types of ion exchange membranes, Water Res, 41, 1984, 10.1016/j.watres.2007.01.019 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Geelhoed, 2010, Electricity-mediated biological hydrogen production, Curr Opin Microbiol, 13, 307, 10.1016/j.mib.2010.02.002 · DOI
  14. Lee, 2009, Significance of biological hydrogen oxidation in a continuous single-chamber microbial electrolysis cell, Environ Sci Technol, 44, 948, 10.1021/es9025358 · doi:10.1021/es9025358
  15. Kato Marcus, 2007, Conduction-based modeling of the biofilm anode of a microbial fuel cell, Biotechnol Bioeng, 98, 1171, 10.1002/bit.21533 · DOI · Paper page
  16. Cheng, 2006, Increased power generation in a continuous flow MFC with advective flow through the porous anode and reduced electrode spacing, Environ Sci Technol, 40, 2426, 10.1021/es051652w · DOI · Paper page
  17. Jeremiasse, 2009, Use of biocompatible buffers to reduce the concentration overpotential for hydrogen evolution, Environ Sci Technol, 43, 6882, 10.1021/es9008823 · DOI
  18. Cheng, 2006, Increased performance of single-chamber microbial fuel cells using an improved cathode structure, Electrochem Commun, 8, 489, 10.1016/j.elecom.2006.01.010 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Cheng, 2005, Power densities using different cathode catalysts (Pt and CoTMPP) and polymer binders (Nafion and PTFE) in single chamber microbial fuel cells, Environ Sci Technol, 40, 364, 10.1021/es0512071 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Call, 2008, Hydrogen production in a single chamber microbial electrolysis cell lacking a membrane, Environ Sci Technol, 42, 3401, 10.1021/es8001822 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Selembo, 2010, Hydrogen production with nickel powder cathode catalysts in microbial electrolysis cells, Int J Hydrogen Energy, 35, 428, 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2009.11.014 · DOI
  22. Freguia, 2007, Non-catalyzed cathodic oxygen reduction at graphite granules in microbial fuel cells, Electrochim Acta, 53, 598, 10.1016/j.electacta.2007.07.037 · DOI · Paper page
  23. Lewis, 1966, Biochemical fuel cells, Bacteriol Rev, 30, 101, 10.1128/br.30.1.101-113.1966 · doi:10.1128/br.30.1.101-113.1966
  24. He, 2006, Application of bacterial biocathodes in microbial fuel cells, Electroanalysis, 18, 2009, 10.1002/elan.200603628 · DOI · Paper page
  25. Vincent, 2007, Investigating and exploiting the electrocatalytic properties of hydrogenases, Chem Rev, 107, 4366, 10.1021/cr050191u · DOI · Paper page
  26. Lojou, 2004, Electrocatalytic reactions at hydrogenase-modified electrodes and their applications to biosensors: from the isolated enzymes to the whole cells, Electroanalysis, 16, 1093, 10.1002/elan.200403002 · doi:10.1002/elan.200403002
  27. Croese, 2011, Analysis of the microbial community of the biocathode of a hydrogen-producing microbial electrolysis cell, Appl Microbiol Biotechnol, 92, 1083, 10.1007/s00253-011-3583-x · DOI
  28. Vignais, 2001, Classification and phylogeny of hydrogenases1, FEMS Microbiol Rev, 25, 455, 10.1016/S0168-6445(01)00063-8 · DOI · Paper page
  29. Rozendal, 2007, Hydrogen production with a microbial biocathode, Environ Sci Technol, 42, 629, 10.1021/es071720+ · DOI · Paper page
  30. Jeremiasse, 2010, Microbial electrolysis cell with a microbial biocathode, Bioelectrochemistry, 78, 39, 10.1016/j.bioelechem.2009.05.005 · DOI · Paper page
  31. Tartakovsky, 2009, High rate membrane-less microbial electrolysis cell for continuous hydrogen production, Int J Hydrogen Energy, 34, 672, 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2008.11.003 · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2008.11.003
  32. Jeremiasse, 2012, Acetate enhances startup of a H2-producing microbial biocathode, Biotechnol Bioeng, 109, 657, 10.1002/bit.24338 · doi:10.1002/bit.24338
  33. Zehnder, 1980, Characterization of an acetate-decarboxylating, non-hydrogen-oxidizing methane bacterium, Arch Microbiol, 124, 1, 10.1007/BF00407022 · DOI · Paper page
  34. Selembo, 2009, The use of stainless steel and nickel alloys as low-cost cathodes in microbial electrolysis cells, J Power Sources, 190, 271, 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2008.12.144 · DOI · Paper page
  35. Olivares-Ramírez, 2007, Studies on the hydrogen evolution reaction on different stainless steels, Int J Hydrogen Energy, 32, 3170, 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2006.03.017 · DOI
  36. Call, 2009, High surface area stainless steel brushes as cathodes in microbial electrolysis cells, Environ Sci Technol, 43, 2179, 10.1021/es803074x · DOI · Paper page
  37. Zhang, 2010, The use and optimization of stainless steel mesh cathodes in microbial electrolysis cells, Int J Hydrogen Energy, 35, 12020, 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2010.08.064 · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2010.08.064
  38. Da Silva, 2004, Electrochemical deprotonation of phosphate on stainless steel, Electrochim Acta, 49, 4553, 10.1016/j.electacta.2004.04.039 · doi:10.1016/j.electacta.2004.04.039
  39. De Silva Muñoz, 2007, Role of the reversible electrochemical deprotonation of phosphate species in anaerobic biocorrosion of steels, Corros Sci, 49, 3988, 10.1016/j.corsci.2007.04.003 · doi:10.1016/j.corsci.2007.04.003
  40. Munoz, 2010, Combining phosphate species and stainless steel cathode to enhance hydrogen evolution in microbial electrolysis cell (MEC), Electrochem Commun, 12, 183, 10.1016/j.elecom.2009.11.017 · doi:10.1016/j.elecom.2009.11.017
  41. Merrill, 2009, Electrolyte effects on hydrogen evolution and solution resistance in microbial electrolysis cells, J Power Sources, 191, 203, 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2009.02.077 · doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2009.02.077
  42. Ambler, 2011, Evaluation of stainless steel cathodes and a bicarbonate buffer for hydrogen production in microbial electrolysis cells using a new method for measuring gas production, Int J Hydrogen Energy, 36, 160, 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2010.09.044 · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2010.09.044
  43. Harnisch, 2009, Electrocatalytic and corrosion behaviour of tungsten carbide in near-neutral pH electrolytes, Appl Catal B Environ, 87, 63, 10.1016/j.apcatb.2008.08.016 · DOI
  44. Harnisch, 2009, Tungsten carbide as electrocatalyst for the hydrogen evolution reaction in pH neutral electrolyte solutions, Appl Catal B Environ, 89, 455, 10.1016/j.apcatb.2009.01.003 · DOI · Paper page
  45. Hu, 2009, Hydrogen production in single-chamber tubular microbial electrolysis cells using non-precious-metal catalysts, Int J Hydrogen Energy, 34, 8535, 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2009.08.011 · DOI · Paper page
  46. Navarro-Flores, 2005, Characterization of Ni, NiMo, NiW and NiFe electroactive coatings as electrocatalysts for hydrogen evolution in an acidic medium, J Mol Catal A Chem, 226, 179, 10.1016/j.molcata.2004.10.029 · DOI · Paper page
  47. Šimpraga, 1997, In situ determination of the 'real are factor’ in H2 evolution electrocatalysis at porous NiFe composite electrodes, J Electroanal Chem, 424, 141, 10.1016/S0022-0728(96)04907-8 · DOI
  48. Hu, 2010, Optimization of NiMo catalyst for hydrogen production in microbial electrolysis cells, Int J Hydrogen Energy, 35, 3227, 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2010.01.131 · DOI
  49. Manuel, 2010, Hydrogen production in a microbial electrolysis cell with nickel-based gas diffusion cathodes, J Power Sources, 195, 5514, 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2010.03.061 · doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2010.03.061
  50. Hrapovic, 2010, Electrodeposition of nickel particles on a gas diffusion cathode for hydrogen production in a microbial electrolysis cell, Int J Hydrogen Energy, 35, 7313, 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2010.04.146 · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2010.04.146
  51. Jeremiasse, 2010, Ni foam cathode enables high volumetric H2 production in a microbial electrolysis cell, Int J Hydrogen Energy, 35, 12716, 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2010.08.131 · DOI · Paper page
  52. Marracino, 1987, A first investigation of flow-through porous electrodes made of metallic felts or foams, Electrochim Acta, 32, 1303, 10.1016/0013-4686(87)85059-4 · doi:10.1016/0013-4686(87)85059-4
  53. Rausch, 1996, Morphology and utilization of smooth hydrogen-evolving raney nickel cathode coatings and porous sintered-nickel cathodes, J Electrochem Soc, 143, 2852, 10.1149/1.1837118 · doi:10.1149/1.1837118
  54. Jeremiasse, 2011, Performance of metal alloys as hydrogen evolution reaction catalysts in a microbial electrolysis cell, Int J Hydrogen Energy, 36, 10482, 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2011.06.013 · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2011.06.013
  55. Fan, 1994, Study of electrodeposited nickel–molybdenum, nickel–tungsten, cobalt–molybdenum, and cobalt–tungsten as hydrogen electrodes in alkaline water electrolysis, J Electrochem Soc, 141, 382, 10.1149/1.2054736 · DOI · Paper page
  56. Arul Raj, 1992, On the catalytic activity of NiMoFe composite surface coatings for the hydrogen cathodes in the industrial electrochemical production of hydrogen, Appl Surf Sci, 59, 245, 10.1016/0169-4332(92)90124-G · DOI
  57. Escapa, 2012, Performance of a continuous flow microbial electrolysis cell (MEC) fed with domestic wastewater, Bioresour Technol, 117, 55, 10.1016/j.biortech.2012.04.060 · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2012.04.060
  58. Cusick, 2010, A monetary comparison of energy recovered from microbial fuel cells and microbial electrolysis cells fed winery or domestic wastewaters, Int J Hydrogen Energy, 35, 8855, 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2010.06.077 · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2010.06.077
  59. Fan, 2011, Nanoparticle decorated anodes for enhanced current generation in microbial electrochemical cells, Biosens Bioelectron, 26, 1908, 10.1016/j.bios.2010.05.006 · doi:10.1016/j.bios.2010.05.006
  60. Huang, 2011, A new cathodic electrode deposit with palladium nanoparticles for cost-effective hydrogen production in a microbial electrolysis cell, Int J Hydrogen Energy, 36, 2773, 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2010.11.114 · DOI
  61. Polcaro, 1991, Electrodeposition of catalysts for hydrogenation of organic molecules: deposition mechanism of Pd on carbon felt, Electrochim Acta, 36, 921, 10.1016/0013-4686(91)85295-I · doi:10.1016/0013-4686(91)85295-i
  62. Mitov, 2012, Novel nanostructured electrocatalysts for hydrogen evolution reaction in neutral and weak acidic solutions, Int J Hydrogen Energy, 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.02.102 · DOI
  63. Sobczynski, 1991, Molybdenum disulfide as a hydrogen evolution catalyst for water photodecomposition on semiconductors, J Catal, 131, 156, 10.1016/0021-9517(91)90332-X · DOI
  64. Zong, 2008, Enhancement of photocatalytic H2 evolution on CdS by loading MoS2 as Co catalyst under visible light irradiation, J Am Chem Soc, 130, 7176, 10.1021/ja8007825 · DOI · Paper page
  65. Tokash, 2011, Electrochemical evaluation of molybdenum disulfide as a catalyst for hydrogen evolution in microbial electrolysis cells, Int J Hydrogen Energy, 36, 9439, 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2011.05.080 · DOI
  66. Rozendal, 2008, Towards practical implementation of bioelectrochemical wastewater treatment, Trends Biotechnol, 26, 450, 10.1016/j.tibtech.2008.04.008 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

See all 353

Metadata

Authors
Kundu, A., Sahu, J. N., Redzwan, G., & Hashim, M. A.
Venue
International Journal of Hydrogen Energy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-02
Volume
38
Issue
4
Pages
1745-1757
ISSN
0360-3199 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2015676447
Cited by
353
References
1
FWCI
14.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
  • www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
  • www.elsevier.com/legal/tdmrep-license (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An overview of cathode material and catalysts suitable for generating hydrogen in microbial electrolysis cell. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.11.031
The paper
Kundu, A., Sahu, J. N., Redzwan, G., & Hashim, M. A. (2013). An overview of cathode material and catalysts suitable for generating hydrogen in microbial electrolysis cell. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.11.031

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.