Simulation of boil-off losses during transfer at a LH2 based hydrogen refueling station
Open accessIntegrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Petitpas's model ignores the insulation in the energy balance and assumes a constant rate of heat ingress into the tank.
“This model ignores the insulation in the energy balance, instead assuming a constant rate of heat ingress into the tank; 50 W was found to yield the closest estimate to the experimental data.”
From Modelling of Liquid Hydrogen Boil-Off (2022) · cites this paper as [27]
Tools that can accurately estimate BOG production are particularly important in the context of industrial-scale LH2 storage, as the capital expense to design and implement such systems is large, and experimental testing at a relevant pilot-scale can be cost-prohibitive with the results obtained making it difficult to translate to full-scale if their description is entirely empirical.
“Tools that can accurately estimate BOG production are particularly important in the context of industrial-scale LH 2 storage, as the capital expense to design and implement such systems is large, and experimental testing at a relevant pilot-scale can be cost-prohibitive with the results obtained making it difficult to translate to full-scale if their description is entirely empirical [27,28].”
From Modelling of Liquid Hydrogen Boil-Off (2022) · cites this paper as [27]
In the work of Petitpas, a 12.5 m3 LH2 Dewar tank with a 2 m internal diameter at the Lawrence Livermore Cryogenic Hydrogen Test Facility was subjected to ambient heat ingress to measure the change in liquid volume over summer versus winter.
“In the work of Petitpas [27], a 12.5 m 3 LH 2 Dewar tank with a 2 m internal diameter at the Lawrence Livermore Cryogenic Hydrogen Test Facility was subjected to ambient heat ingress to measure the change in liquid volume over summer versus winter.”
From Modelling of Liquid Hydrogen Boil-Off (2022) · cites this paper as [27]
U_VL = 0.15 W/m2/K was chosen for the model because it best matched the vapor temperature data reported by Petitpas.
“A vapor-liquid heat transfer coefficient, U VL = 0.15 W/m 2 /K was chosen as this best matched the vapor temperature data reported by Petitpas [27].”
From Modelling of Liquid Hydrogen Boil-Off (2022) · cites this paper as [27]
Throughout the Petitpas experiment, the system remained static, meaning no mass transfer across the system boundary occurred.
“Throughout the experiment, the system remained 'static', meaning no mass transfer across the system boundary (such as refuelling) occurred.”
From Modelling of Liquid Hydrogen Boil-Off (2022) · cites this paper as [27]
Petitpas presented a model to estimate the boil-off losses based on their experimental data.
“Petitpas also presented a model to estimate the boil-off losses based on their experimental data.”
From Modelling of Liquid Hydrogen Boil-Off (2022) · cites this paper as [27]
In Petitpas's model, 50 W was found to yield the closest estimate to the experimental data.
“This model ignores the insulation in the energy balance, instead assuming a constant rate of heat ingress into the tank; 50 W was found to yield the closest estimate to the experimental data.”
From Modelling of Liquid Hydrogen Boil-Off (2022) · cites this paper as [27]
Cites
Aceves, S. M., Petitpas, G., Espinosa-Loza, F., Matthews, M. J., & Ledesma-Orozco, E. (2013) · International Journal of Hydrogen Energy · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.11.123 · Cited by 150 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Hydrogen economy, energy, and liquid organic carriers for its mobility
Singh, R., Singh, M., & Gautam, S. (2021) · Materials Today: Proceedings · doi:10.1016/j.matpr.2020.09.065 · Cited by 148 · see citing works
Escamilla, A., Sánchez, D., & García-Rodríguez, L. (2022) · International Journal of Hydrogen Energy · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.03.238 · Cited by 143 · see citing works
Modelling of Liquid Hydrogen Boil-Off
Al Ghafri, S. Z. S., Swanger, A., Jusko, V., Siahvashi, A., Perez, F., Johns, M. L., & May, E. F. (2022) · Energies · doi:10.3390/en15031149 · Cited by 131 · see citing works
“15 W/m2/K was chosen as this best matched the vapor temperature data reported by Petitpas [27].”
BackgroundMethodInfluential
- Authors
- Petitpas, G.
- Affiliations
- Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (US)
- Corresponding author
- Petitpas, Guillaume
- Venue
- International Journal of Hydrogen Energy
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-11
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 46
- Pages
- 21451-21463
- ISSN
- 0360-3199 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2897362906
- Cited by
- 98
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 22 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3
- FWCI
- 2.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- International Journal of Hydrogen Energy (acceptedVersion)
- OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- US Department of Energy
- Fuel Cell Technologies Office
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Spacecraft and Cryogenic Technologies
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Phase Equilibria and Thermodynamics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › Heat transfer and supercritical fluids
- Keywords
- liquid hydrogen, hydrogen refueling stations, two-phase flow, evaporation and condensation, real gas equation of state, REFPROP, subcooled liquid, vapor compression, hydrogen venting, heat transfer
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review