Assessment of power-to-power renewable energy storage based on the smart integration of hydrogen and micro gas turbine technologies
Open accessAbstract
Power-to-Power is a process whereby the surplus of renewable power is stored as chemical energy in the form of hydrogen. Hydrogen can be used in situ or transported to the consumption node. When power is needed again, hydrogen can be consumed for power generation. Each of these processes incurs energy losses, leading to a certain round-trip efficiency (Energy Out/Energy In). Round-trip efficiency is calculated considering the following processes; water electrolysis for hydrogen production, compressed, liquefied or metal-hydride for hydrogen storage, fuel-cell-electric-truck for hydrogen distribution and micro-gas turbine for hydrogen power generation. The maximum achievable round-trip efficiency is of 29% when considering solid oxide electrolysis along with metal hydride storage. This number goes sharply down when using either alkaline or proton exchange membrane electrolyzers, 22.2% and 21.8% respectively. Round-trip efficiency is further reduced if considering other storage media, such as compressed- or liquefied-H2. However, the aim of the paper is to highlight there is still a large margin to increase Power-to-Power round-trip efficiency, mainly from the hydrogen production and power generation blocks, which could lead to round-trip efficiencies of around 40%–42% in the next decade for Power-to-Power energy storage systems with micro-gas turbines.
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
This paper thermodynamically assesses micro power-to-power (P2P) energy storage using hydrogen and micro gas turbines, reporting round-trip efficiencies between 22% and 29% depending on electrolyser and storage configuration. It finds electrolysis dominates energy losses, while SOEC-based systems achieve the highest efficiencies and future improvements could raise round-trip efficiency to 40–42%.
Key findings
- Round-trip efficiency of the P2P system with micro gas turbines ranges from 22% to 29% (abstract); SOEC cases reach about 29.0% with metal hydride storage, 27.9% with compressed H₂, and 25.6% with liquefied H₂, while AEC/PEMEC cases are around 21–22% for compressed H₂ or metal hydride and below 20% for liquefied H₂.
- Electrolyser energy consumption dominates the system, accounting for 86–98% of the total energy flow into the system; specific consumption is about 40 kWh/kg H₂ for SOEC versus 52 kWh/kg H₂ for AEC and 53 kWh/kg H₂ for PEMEC.
- Hydrogen compression is estimated at around 10% of H₂ energy content (abstract); for compressed-H₂ storage, compressors consume 3.5% of total energy and distribution 1.5%, while liquefied-H₂ storage consumes 10–13% and distribution 0.4%, and metal hydride storage is treated as energy-neutral with distribution at 2%.
- A fuel cell electric truck distributing hydrogen over an average 200 km per trip can carry about 3,815 kg of liquefied H₂, roughly four times the energy transportable as compressed H₂ or metal hydride; future improvements could yield round-trip efficiencies above 40–42% in the next decade.
Methods
- The study performs a thermodynamic analysis and energy balance of a P2P system comprising hydrogen production, storage, distribution, and power generation, using equations for electrolysis, compression, liquefaction, distribution, and round-trip efficiency.
- It evaluates nine combinations: three electrolyser technologies (AEC, PEMEC, SOEC), three H₂ storage states (compressed gas at 500 bar, liquefied H₂, metal hydride), and one micro gas turbine option, with distribution by fuel cell electric truck over about 200 km per trip.
- Input data are taken from original equipment manufacturer specifications and literature, including commercial electrolysers, compression scenarios, liquefaction plants, metal hydride storage products, and micro gas turbine performance.
Limitations
- The paper states that economics are left out because data are scarce and uncertain, and that a dedicated economic assessment is needed once technical features are more advanced.
- It states that length limitations prevent detailed integration and optimisation of the numerous power and heat streams, so the study is a first step toward more refined analysis.
- It notes that waste heat recovery is not considered, making conclusions conservative, and that reversible SOFC operation is excluded due to lower technology readiness and lack of a high-grade waste energy source.
- Evident from the text: the results rely on manufacturer specifications and literature data rather than experimental validation, and the analysis does not include a full system optimisation or economic evaluation.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
0 of 48 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
- Findingnone given
Thermodynamic analysis of hydrogen compression gives a specific energy consumption of around 10% of the hydrogen energy content.
“Thermodynamic analysis of H2 compression with a speci_c energy consumption of around 10% of H2 energy content.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
For AEC or PEMEC electrolysers, their round-trip efficiencies are fairly similar due to their comparable specific energy consumption, 52.3 and 53.4 kWh/kg H2 (Fig. 7).
“As far as the other electrolyser technologies are concerned (AEC or PEMEC), their round-trip efficiencies are fairly similar due to their comparable specific energy consumption, 52.3 and 53.4 kWh=kg H2 (Fig. 7)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingreasoning
Increasing the number of compression stages reduces compression work because the compression process becomes closer to isothermal.
“Increasing the number of stages brings about a reduction of compression work because the compression process becomes closer to isothermal.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
If an alkaline electrolyser or a proton exchange membrane electrolyser is used instead of a solid oxide electrolyser, the maximum round-trip efficiency is around 22% at best.
“If AEC or PEMEC were used in lieu of an SOEC, h round-trip would go down to around 22% at best.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: For power-to-power energy storage solutions, three types of electrolysers (alkaline, proton exchange membrane, and solid oxide) can be used to convert surplus renewable electricity into hydrogen.
- Findingown data
If AEC or PEMEC were used in lieu of an SOEC, round-trip efficiency would go down to around 22% at best.
“If AEC or PEMEC were used in lieu of an SOEC, h round-trip would go down to around 22% at best.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- Findingreasoning
For the metal hydride storage case, distribution takes 2% of the total energy input.
“Therefore, storage is considered energy-neutral and distribution takes 2% of the total energy in.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Calculations for various configurations of the selected system have shown that the maximum round-trip efficiency achievable is below 30% and this applies to a system based on the smart integration of a Solid Oxide Electrolyser (SOEC) for H2 production, compressed-H2 storage and micro gas turbine (mGT).
“Calculations for various configurations of the selected system have shown that the maximum h round-trip achievable is below 30% and this applies to a system based on the smart integration of a Solid Oxide Elecrolyser (SOEC) for H 2 production, compressed-H 2 storage and micro gas turbine (mGT).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The LH2 round-trip efficiency value of ≈25.6% is obtained when one of the lowest specific power requirements of the LH2 plant is chosen from the options in Table 6, even though this is not the minimum value (B18).
“This latter value is obtained when one of the lowest specific power requirement of the LH 2 plant is chosen from the options in Table 6, even though, interestingly, this is not the minimum value (B18).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
For the configurations considered, the maximum round-trip efficiency achievable for a power-to-power energy storage system based on a solid oxide electrolyser for hydrogen production, compressed hydrogen storage and a micro gas turbine is below 30%.
“Calculations for various configurations of the selected system have shown that the maximum h round-trip achievable is below 30%, for the time being, and this applies to a system based on the smart integration of a Solid Oxide Electrolyser (SOEC) for H 2 production, compressed-H 2 storage and micro gas turbine (mGT).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: For power-to-power energy storage solutions, three types of electrolysers (alkaline, proton exchange membrane, and solid oxide) can be used to convert surplus renewable electricity into hydrogen.
- Findingown data
In the power-to-power system, the electrolyser accounts for the largest share of energy consumption, ranging from 86% to 98% of the total energy flow into the system.
“As expected, the electrolyser holds the largest share of energy consumption, ranging from 86 to 98% of the total flow of energy into the system (power produced by the micro gas turbine), and storage and distribution fall well behind.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The round-trip efficiency of the considered micro power-to-power systems ranges from 20% to 29% depending on the configuration.
“This information (h round-trip ) is reported in Fig. 9 for the cases under consideration, showing values ranging from 20% to 29% depending on the configuration of choice.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: For the metal hydride storage case, storage is considered energy-neutral.
- Findingown data
Compression from 1 to 1000 bar requires twice as much work as compression from 30 to 1000 bar: 4 kWh/kg H2 and 2 kWh/kg H2 respectively.
“This effect is assessed in Fig. 4a, showing that compression from 1 to 1000 bar requires twice as much work as compression from 30 to 1000 bar, 4 kWh=kg H2 and 2 kWh=kg H2 respectively.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
For a given number of stages, non-isentropic compression by individual stages increases the total work needed to compress hydrogen.
“For a given number of stages, non-isentropic compression by the individual stages increases the total work needed to compress hydrogen.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisereasoning
Solid oxide electrolysis requires water in the form of steam at around 800 C, which requires significant energy consumption external to the electrolyser stack.
“The working conditions of this type of electrolyser are totally different to the previous two since water must be provided in the form of steam at around 800 C and this requires a significant consumption of energy externally to the electrolyser stack.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisereasoning
Pumped hydroelectric storage is strongly dependent on local geographic features because it requires water streams and natural or artificial basins with large differences in altitude, which restricts its large-scale deployment.
“Nevertheless, PHS is strongly dependent on local geographic features as it requires the presence of both water streams and natural/ artificial basins with large differences in altitude.This poses obvious restrictions on the large-scale deployment of PHS systems.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
For solid oxide electrolysis, response and start-up/shutdown times range from minutes to hours to prevent drastic reduction in component lifetime caused by fast temperature gradients.
“On the contrary, even if SOEC adapts rather quickly to changes in load setting, both the response and start-up/shutdown times range from minutes to hours to prevent the drastic reduction in the lifetime of components caused by fast temperature gradients [40,41].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [40]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [41]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
Compressed air energy storage has technical and economic feasibility limited to locations where large caverns are available.
“Compressed Air Energy Storage (CAES) has similar limitations since its technical and economic feasibility is limited to locations where large caverns are available [9].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [9]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisenone given
Solid oxide electrolysis is the least mature among the three electrolyser technologies.
“The least mature technology amongst the three is SOEC.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
The energy required to sustain the water electrolysis reaction is fairly constant in the range from 0 C to 1000 C.
“Interestingly though, the energy required to sustain the water electrolysis reaction is fairly constant in the range from 0 C to 1000 C [42], meaning that the higher consumption of heat (to produce steam in lieu of hot water) is compensated for by a much lower consumption of electricity.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [42]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisereasoning
Alkaline electrolysis is more appropriate for stationary applications where operating conditions remain steady and load changes are slow, owing to its large footprint and difficulty coping with steep thermal transients.
“AEC is more appropriate for stationary applications where the operating conditions remain steady and load changes are slow, owing to their large footprint and difficulty to cope with steep thermal transients.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Alkaline and proton-exchange membrane electrolysers are rather quick and flexible over a wide output range of 5-10% to 100% load.
“Regarding the response time and start-up/shutdown capability (i.e., flexibility) of these types of ECs, both AEC and PEMEC are rather quick and flexible in a wide output range (5e10 to 100% load).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Alkaline and proton-exchange membrane electrolysers are eligible for a very wide range of applications, including direct coupling to renewable energy sources and participation in different electricity markets.
“Hence, AEC and PEMEC are eligible for a very wide range of applications, including direct coupling to RES, as well as in the different electricity markets [37].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [37]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
Given the intermittent nature of renewable energy sources, reciprocating compressors with several stages of intercooling are deemed the best solution for hydrogen compression in this work.
“With this in mind and given the intermittent nature of RES for the production of green energy (wind and solar photovoltaic are the dominant sources of renewable energy, in addition to hydro), reciprocating compressors with several stages of intercooling are deemed the best solution for hydrogen compression in this work.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Cryogenic hydrogen has much higher energy and mass density: 0.083 kg/m3 at 1.013 bar and 295 K as opposed to 76.2 kg/m3 at the same pressure but 15 K.
“the much higher energy and mass density is a clear, direct benefit of dealing with cryogenic hydrogen: 0.083 kg/m 3 at 1.013 bar and 295 K as opposed to 76.2 kg/m 3 at the same pressure but 15 K [54].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [54]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
The cumulative effect of this foreseen progress on the performance of mGT-P2P technology would translate into round-trip efficiency higher than 40-42% in the next decade.
“The cumulative effect of this foreseen progress on the performance of mGT-P2P technology would translate into h round-trip higher than 40e42% in the next decade.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Micro gas turbines can run at full capacity just a few minutes after start-up and their electric efficiency ranges from 25% for smaller units (<100 kWe) to almost 40% for larger units (≈500 kWe).
- Rests on an assumption: The electric efficiency of micro gas turbines is lower than fuel cells (>55%) and reciprocating internal combustion engines (>45%), but mGTs offer high grade heat for Combined Heat and Power (>250 C).
- Interpretationreasoning
Improvements in the hydrogen production and power generation stages could lead to a round-trip efficiency of around 40-42% in the next decade.
“Improvements in these systems could lead to h round-trip of around 40e42% in the next decade.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
The 6.7 kWh/kg power consumption is around half of what had been declared for existing H2 liquefaction plants.
“which is around half of what had been declared for existing H 2 liquefaction plants [58].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [58]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
The variations of round-trip efficiency from one case to another in Fig. 9 are brought about solely by the electrolyser technology used (AEC, PEMEC or SOEC), given that the mGT specifications are the same for all cases.
“yet, given that the mGT specifications are the same for all cases, the variations of round-trip efficiency from one case to another in Fig. 9 are brought about solely by the electrolyser technology used (AEC, PEMEC or SOEC).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The figure of merit used in this study, round-trip efficiency, is not influenced by the cooling/heating effect for metal hydrides.
“Hence, the figure of merit used in this study, round-trip efficiency, is not influenced by this effect.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: In this study, the cooling/heating sources for metal hydride adsorption/desorption are available from waste heat streams and no additional electric power consumption is needed.
- Interpretationcitation
An even larger performance enhancement could come from further improvements in micro gas turbine technology.
“Parallel to this, an even larger performance enhancement could come from further improvements in micro gas turbine technology.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Micro gas turbines can run at full capacity just a few minutes after start-up and their electric efficiency ranges from 25% for smaller units (<100 kWe) to almost 40% for larger units (≈500 kWe).
- Interpretationnone given
The largest potential for improvement in the micro gas turbine power-to-power energy storage system is in the hydrogen production and power generation stages.
“The largest potential is found in the hydrogen production and power generation stages of the system.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The potential for improvement is found in the hydrogen production and power generation stages of the system.
“This potential is found in the hydrogen production and power generation stages of the system.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
The IDEALHY project results showed that a total power consumption of around 6.7 kWh/kg H2 (approximately 20% of H2 LHV) could be achieved.
“The results from this project showed that a total power consumption of around 6.7 kWh=kg H2 (z20% of H 2 LHV) could be achieved”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [57]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisereasoning
Delivery pressure from the electrolyser is a key parameter determining compressor power during downstream compression of hydrogen for storage.
“Delivery pressure from the electrolyser is a key parameter determining compressor power during the downstream compression of H 2 for storage, since this is the pressure (same for temperature) at the intake of the storage compressor.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The volume available for transportation of H2 sets a strong constraint, either in the form of high-pressure tubes, liquefied-H2 tanks or truck size limitations.
“Therefore, the volume available for transportation of H 2 sets a strong constraint, either in the form of high-pressure tubes, liquefied-H 2 tanks or truck size limitations.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Regardless of storage technology, higher H2 densities lead to lower energy cost of hydrogen transportation/distribution.
- Interpretationreasoning
A cryogenic plant is needed to reduce hydrogen temperature to such low values if H2 is to be stored in liquid state.
“Therefore, a cryogenic plant is needed in order to reduce the temperature of hydrogen to such extremely low values if H 2 is to be stored in liquid state.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
For on-site or nearby consumption within a short distance, LH2 is not of interest because the increase in H2 density does not offset the much higher energy consumption of the hydrogen conditioning process.
“Thus, for on-site or nearby consumption within a short distance, LH 2 is not of interest given that the increase in H 2 density does not offset the much higher energy consumption of the hydrogenconditioning process.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Liquefied-H2 features a density of ≈78 kg/m3 and the liquefaction process is highly energy intensive.
- Interpretationreasoning
Departing from isentropic compression poses a higher demand on the interstage cooling system because of the higher inlet temperature to the intercooler.
“departing from isentropic (i.e.lower efficiency of the individual compression stages) poses a higher demand on the interstage cooling system (coolant pump) because of the higher inlet temperature to the intercooler.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Despite having round-trip efficiency ≈29%, mGT-P2P is the only fully flexible (installation wise) large-scale, long-term energy storage solution that can be installed virtually anywhere where there is a need for energy storage.
“Hence, despite having h round-trip z 29%, it is the only fully flexible (installation wise) large-scale, long-term energy storage solution that can be installed virtually anywhere where there is a need for energy storage.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationnone given
Only hydro, compressed-air storage (CAES) and liquid air storage (LAES) are comparable to mGT-P2P (or GT-P2P) in their capacity to store energy for days or even months at a larger scale.
“However, only hydro, compressed-air storage (CAES) and liquid air storage (LAES) are comparable to mGT-P2P (or, in general, GT-P2P) in their capacity to store energy for days or even months at a larger scale.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
In the pressure range 1-30 bar, hydrogen is liquid only at temperatures below 20.37 K (1 bar) to 33.14 K (12.79 bar critical pressure).
“in this pressure range, hydrogen is found in the liquid state only at temperatures below 20.37 K (1 bar) to 33.14 K (12.79 bar -critical pressure) [54].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [54]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 39
- May combine two claims. 47
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Findingnone givenHydrogen can be transported by fuel cell electric truck for an average distance of 200 km per trip.
“Hydrogen transportation by Fuel Cell Electric Truck for an average distance of 200 km per trip.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Findingnone givenThe round-trip efficiency of a power-to-power energy storage system with micro gas turbines is between 22% and 29%.
“Round-trip e_ciency of P2P energy storage system with micro gas turbines between 22% and 29%.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe specific energy consumption of AEC and PEMEC electrolysers changes when the operating conditions of the electrolyser change, regardless of the technology of choice (Eq. (3)), and when different materials or integration layouts are adopted.
“Furthermore, the specific energy consumption of these electrolysers also changes when the operating conditions of the electrolyser change, regardless of the technology of choice (Eq.( 3)), and when different materials or integration layouts are adopted.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataFor cases based on SOEC, the highest round-trip efficiency is obtained when hydrogen is stored in the form of MH (≈29.0%), followed closely by compressed-H2 (≈27.9%), and LH2 at a further distance (≈25.6%).
“For cases based on SOEC, the highest efficiency is obtained when hydrogen is stored in the form of MH (z29.0%),followed closely by compressed-H 2 (z27.9%), and LH 2 at a further distance (z25.6%).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Findingnone givenIf a FCET is considered, around 3840 kg of LH2 can be transported in a single trip, which is around four times the energy that can be transported when considering compressed-H2 or MH.
“If a FCET is considered, around 3840 kg of LH 2 can be transported in a single trip, which is around four times the energy that can be transported when considering compressed-H 2 or MH.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Regardless of storage technology, higher H2 densities lead to lower energy cost of hydrogen transportation/distribution.
May combine two claims.
Findingnone givenFor metal hydride storage, storage is almost free energy-wise if a suitable heat source is available or if the metal hydride operates at ambient temperature.
“The case of MH is different to the other two storage options since storage is almost free energy-wise, if and where there is a heat source available at a suitable temperature or when the metal hydride is suitable for operation at ambient temperature (see Section Metal Hydrides (MH)).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataFor AEC or PEMEC electrolysers, they experience the same fluctuations when different storage media are considered (Fig. 9): efficiency lower than 20% for LH2 and around 21-22% for compressed-H2 or MH.
“and they experience the same fluctuations when different storage media are considered (Fig. 9): efficiency lower than 20% for LH 2 and around 21e22% for compressed-H 2 or MH.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataIf the value corresponding to one of the existing LH2 plants were selected (for instance, 11.9 kWh/kg H2 corresponding to case B19), the round-trip efficiency would go down to 22.7% and the energy consumption of the LH2 facility would take 20% of the total energy demand of the power-to-power storage system.
“Actually, if the value corresponding to one of the existing LH 2 plants were selected (for instance, 11.9 kWh=kg H2 corresponding to case B19), h round-trip would go down to 22.7% and the energy consumption of the LH 2 facility would take 20% of the total energy demand of the power-to-power storage system.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingreasoningFor liquefied-H2 storage, storage accounts for 10%-13% of total energy consumption, while distribution takes only 0.4%.
“As a result, storage accounts for 10%e13% of the total energy consumption whereas distribution takes 0.4% of the total energy in only.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingreasoningSOEC electrolyser energy consumption is 40 kWh/kg H2, compared to 52 kWh/kg H2 for AEC and 53 kWh/kg H2 for PEMEC.
“A closer look into the energy consumed by the electrolyser in each case, Fig. 7, reveals that this energy consumption is largely reduced when SOECs are used as opposed to either AEC or PEMEC: 40 kWh=kg H2 against 52 kWh=kg H2 and 53 kWh=kg H2 respectively.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingreasoningThe operation of an ideal electrolyser with null losses would require 33.33 kWh/kg H2, which translates into a potential 13-15% gain in round-trip efficiency.
“In particular, the operation of an ideal electrolyser with null losses would require 33.33 kWh=kg H2 what translates into a potential 13e15% gain in h round-trip .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenPumped hydroelectric storage is the oldest and most mature energy storage technology.
“Pumped Hydroelectric Storage (PHS) is the oldest and most mature technology.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe capital cost of proton-exchange membrane electrolysers is 2 to 3 times higher than that of alkaline electrolysers, though it is expected to decrease to about 600-1300 EUR/kW in the following decade.
“However, the Capital Cost (CapEx) of PEMECs is 2e3 times higher than for AEC, even if this figure is expected to decrease to some 600e1300 V/kW in the following decade [17,37,38].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [17]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [37]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [38]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationGrey hydrogen is 5 to 8 times cheaper than green hydrogen according to several techno-economic assessments.
“In particular, grey hydrogen is 5e8 times cheaper than green hydrogen according to several techno-economic assessments of the technology [2,10,17].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [2]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [10]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [17]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenProton-exchange membrane electrolysers have a smaller footprint and much better response to rapid load changes.
“PEMECs are characterised by a smaller footprint and much better response to rapid load changes.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationBlue hydrogen has specific emissions of 0.2 t CO2 per t H2.
“Blue hydrogen: same as grey hydrogen but incorporating Carbon Capture and Sequestration (CCS) techniques.Specific emissions decrease to 0.2 t CO2 /t H2 .”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [17]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Premisenone givenUnlike pumped hydroelectric storage or compressed air energy storage, hydrogen can be produced in situ wherever there are power and water supplies.
“Unlike PHS or CAES, hydrogen can be produced in-situ wherever there are power and water supplies.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningBecause of variable renewable energy intermittency, limited large-scale energy storage, and larger variable renewable energy shares, the grid must still rely on conventional power generation technologies when variable renewable energy is not available.
“This, along with the very limited options for large-scale energy storage available today and the increasingly larger share of VREs into the energy mix, implies that the grid must still rely on conventional power generation technologies to generate electricity when VRE is not available.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Conventional power generation technologies are very reliable but feature high emissions of greenhouse gases and, in some cases, other hazardous emissions such as nuclear waste.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationApproximately EUR 60 billion of investment is required by 2030 to achieve cost-effectiveness of hydrogen technologies.
“Approximately EUR 60 billion investment is required by 2030 to achieve cost-effectiveness of hydrogen technologies, which can be facilitated through the following five drivers: reduced market uncertainty, larger improvement-for-investments for technology boost, hybrid solutions, increasing utilisation rates in distribution networks and investments in blue/green hydrogen.2”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [10]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationFor alkaline and proton-exchange membrane electrolysers, the settling time after a load change is on the order of seconds, whereas start-up and shutdown are on the order of minutes.
“These studies report that the settling time after a load change is in the order of seconds whereas start-up and shutdown is in the order of minutes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [43]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisenone givenThermoneutral operation of an electrolyser, when carried out reversibly, determines the minimum energy that must be supplied for sustained operation: 285.8 kJ/mol if water is supplied as liquid or 241.8 kJ/mol if the feed is vapour.
“Operation of the electrolyser at constant temperature is called thermoneutral operation and, when carried out reversibly, determines the minimum amount of energy that must be supplied to the electrolyser for sustained operation: 285.8 kJ mol À1 if water is supplied as a liquid or 241.8 kJ mol À1 if the feed is vapour.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationVariable renewable energies such as wind and solar are intermittent, and their availability for power generation depends mainly on local weather conditions that can be predicted accurately only 24-36 h in advance.
“Variable renewable energies like wind or solar are characterised for being an intermittent source of energy whose availability for power generation depends mainly on local weather conditions, which can be predicted accurately 24e36 h in advance only [3].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [3]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisereasoningAs electrochemical losses of the electrolyser cell increase, the consumption of electrical work increases and efficiency decreases.
“As the electrochemical losses of the electrolyser cell increase, the consumption of electrical work increases with respect to the aforesaid value (237.2 kJ mol À1 at standard pressure and temperature) and efficiency decreases accordingly.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationPumped hydroelectric storage accounts for 96% of total energy storage capacity among all technologies.
“It represents the largest form of storage today, accounting for 96% of the total energy storage capacity amongst all technologies [8].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [8]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationWorldwide hydrogen production is expected to reach 240 Mt by 2050.
“From these values, hydrogen production worldwide is expected to reach 240 Mt by 2050 [2], when it will play a key role in the mobility, power and heat sectors even if this production would cover 7.5% of the global energy demand worldwide only.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [2]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationInterest in power-to-power energy storage systems has been increasing steadily in recent times, in parallel with larger shares of variable renewable energy in the power generation mix worldwide.
“The interest in Power-to-Power energy storage systems has been increasing steadily in recent times, in parallel with the also increasingly larger shares of variable renewable energy (VRE) in the power generation mix worldwide [1].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [1]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationGreen hydrogen has a potentially null carbon footprint.
“Green hydrogen: renewable energy sources RES are used in this case so the associated carbon footprint is potentially null.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [17]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationreasoningThe power-to-power system considered in this work is limited to a maximum power output of around 500 kWe.
“Hence, the P2P system considered here is limited to a maximum power output of around 500 kWe.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationMore than twenty applications where hydrogen can become a cost-competitive low-carbon solution before 2030 have been identified in a recent report by the Hydrogen Council.
“More than twenty applications where hydrogen can become a cost-competitive low-carbon solution before 2030 have been identified in a recent report by the Hydrogen Council [10], needing a large investment effort if they are to be developed and taken to the market.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [10]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationAround 143 power-to-gas projects producing either hydrogen or methane have been operated in recent decades, some starting as far back as 1988.
“In this latter group, around 143 PtG projects producing either hydrogen or methane have been operated in the last decades, some of them starting as far back as 1988 [11,12].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [11]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [12]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisereasoningWater electrolysis is the dominant technology for producing green hydrogen because of its fairly high conversion efficiency and direct use of electricity, unlike other technologies that rely mostly on heat.
“Water electrolysis is the dominant technology for the production of green hydrogen owing to its fairly high conversion efficiency and direct use of electricity, as opposed to other technologies which rely mostly on heat.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationWorldwide hydrogen production by the end of 2018 was estimated at 74 Mt, 97% of which was produced through steam reforming of natural gas and therefore with large carbon dioxide emissions.
“The estimated worldwide production of hydrogen by the end of 2018 was 74 Mt, 97% of which was produced through steam reforming of natural gas (methane) and, therefore, with large emissions of carbon dioxide.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [2]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [17]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationGrey hydrogen has specific emissions estimated at 11 t CO2 per t H2.
“Grey hydrogen: the primary energy source is natural gas and the specific emissions of the process are estimated at 11 t CO2 /t H2 .”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [17]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
PremisereasoningThe efficiency of solid oxide electrolysis is above 80% referred to the low heating value of hydrogen and close to 100% when considering the high heating value.
“The net result is that the efficiency of SOEC is above 80% referred to the Low Heating Value (LHV) of hydrogen and close to 100% when considering the High Heating Value (HHV), given that the total energy consumption remains approximately constant in the aforesaid temperature range.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationGermany hosts the largest number of power-to-gas plants, with 64 projects.
“Germany hosts the largest number of these plants, with 64 PtG projects, but the stimulus given by governments around the world will expectedly see other countries catching up in the next years [13e16].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [13e16]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationAs of 2019, there were 56 active power-to-gas projects based on hydrogen, with an installed electric capacity of 24.1 MWe.
“As of 2019, there were 56 active PtG projects based on hydrogen, with an installed electric capacity of 24.1 MWe [11].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [11]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenAlkaline electrolysis is the most mature electrolyser technology and yields the lowest capital cost.
“The most mature technology is AEC and it yields the lowest capital cost (CapEx).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationRecent investigations have shown that further optimisation of the concept would enable an even lower power requirement of approximately 5.9 kWh/kg H2.
“recent investigations have shown that further optimisation of the concept would enable an even lower power requirement of approximately 5.9 kWh=kg H2 [59,60].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [59]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [60]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe lower energy consumption of SOEC is due to its working temperature and implies that a higher grade heat source is needed to raise the temperature of and evaporate the inlet water stream to operate SOEC at rated conditions.
“This difference comes about because of the working temperature, as explained in Section Hydrogen production, and implies that a higher grade heat source which can both raise the temperature of and evaporate the inlet water stream is needed in order to operate the SOEC at the rated conditions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisenone givenHydrogen is commonly produced at close to ambient pressure and temperature, in the range from 1 to 30 bar and from 303 to 333 K.
“Hydrogen is commonly produced at close to ambient pressure and temperature, in the range from 1 to 30 bar and from 303 to 333 K, as stated in section Hydrogen production.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenmGT-P2P also provides a high-grade heat source which makes it suitable for CHP applications.
“Additionally, it also provides a high-grade heat source which makes it suitable for CHP applications.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The electric efficiency of micro gas turbines is lower than fuel cells (>55%) and reciprocating internal combustion engines (>45%), but mGTs offer high grade heat for Combined Heat and Power (>250 C).
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe time period for which hydrogen energy storage is most attractive is on the order of days to months; for shorter or longer storage periods, other technologies exhibit a better trade-off between discharge time and storage efficiency.
“Nevertheless, despite this flexibility, the term-period for which hydrogen energy storage is most attractive is in the order of days to months.For shorter or longer storage periods, other technologies exhibit a better trade-off between discharge time and efficiency of storage [6].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [6]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisenone givenMetal hydrides are characterised by a higher density, exceeding 115 kg_H2/m3.
“These new compounds are characterised by a higher density, exceeding 115 kg_H 2 /m3 (Fig. 3).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningIf the hydrogen production and consumption nodes are at the same location and sufficient space (land area) is available, lower storage pressures can be used, making compressed-H2 storage very attractive.
“Nevertheless, if the hydrogen production and consumption nodes are at the same location and sufficient space (land area) is available, lower storage pressures can be used, making this option very attractive.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningIn spite of the maximum round-trip efficiency of around 30% reported in this work for mGT-P2P energy storage solutions, there is still a large margin for improvement.
“Finally, it is to note that in spite of the maximum h round-trip of around 30% reported in this work for mGT-P2P energy storage solutions, there is still a large margin for improvement.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisereasoningHydrogen can be stored in different ways and for as long as required, unlike other technologies that cannot be used for long-term energy storage.
“This means that hydrogen can be stored in different ways and for as long as it is required, as opposed to other technologies which cannot be used for long-term energy storage.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenHydrogen has the highest gravimetric density among fuels but one of the lowest densities.
“Hydrogen is known to be the fuel with the highest gravimetric density but with the main shortcoming of having one of the lowest densities.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisenone givenWhen diaphragm compressor operation is discontinuous with frequent start/stop, the lifetime of the diaphragm can decrease substantially, leading to more frequent servicing and higher maintenance costs.
“However, when operation is discontinuous (frequent start/stop), the lifetime of the diaphragm can decrease substantially, which means more frequent servicing and, therefore, higher maintenance costs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationPredictions from different world energy organisations [17,37,38] estimate that the energy consumption of electrolysers is expected to decrease by a few kWh/kg H2 in the next decade, leading to a round-trip efficiency improvement of around 3-5% (one third of the theoretical efficiency gain).
“Even if this is a theoretical limit that cannot be achieved in practice, predictions from different world energy organisations [17,37,38] estimate that the energy consumption of electrolysers is expected to decrease by a few kWh/kg H2 in the next decade, leading to a Dh round-trip improvement of around 3e5% (one third of the theoretical efficiency gain).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [17]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [37]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [38]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone givenHydrogen compression is the most common means to store and distribute hydrogen in relatively small quantities of 5-10 kg H2 per tank.
“Hydrogen compression is the most common means to store and distribute hydrogen in relatively small quantities, 5e10 kg H2 /tank.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationGas Turbines are catching up more quickly with Fuel Cells due to lessons learned from hydrogen co-firing in the last decades.
“Gas Turbines (GT) are one of the technologies that is catching up more quickly with FCs, thanks to the lessons learned from hydrogen co-firing in the last decades [83e86].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [83e86]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThe second most influential driver energy-wise is storage, and hydrogen liquefaction brings about a substantial round-trip efficiency reduction.
“It becomes clear that the second most influential driver energy-wise is storage and, in this regard, hydrogen liquefaction brings about a substantial h round-trip reduction.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataDespite the maximum round-trip efficiency of around 30% reported for micro gas turbine power-to-power energy storage solutions, there is still a large margin for improvement.
“Finally, it is to note that in spite of the maximum h round-trip of around 30% reported in this work for mGT-P2P energy storage solutions, there is still a large margin for improvement.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenThe pressure at which hydrogen is compressed ranges from 50 to 400 bar for stationary applications and up to 900 bar for mobility applications.
“The pressure at which hydrogen is compressed depends on the application and it ranges from 50 to 400 bar for stationary applications and to 900 bar for mobility applications (where high density is a critical requirement).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationHydraulically driven dry-running reciprocating compressors are a viable alternative for frequent transient or discontinuous operation and enable high delivery pressures up to 3000 bar with oil-free, leakage-free, and technically abrasion-free compression.
“In applications with more frequent transient and/or discontinuous operation, hydraulically-driven dryrunning reciprocating compressors are a viable alternative.They also enable high delivery pressures of up to 3000 bar [50] with also oil, leakage and technically abrasion free compression.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [50]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationCompressed-H2 requires high-pressure storage vessels (type III & IV [96]) and a compression system able to handle high pressure ratios (>10:1), which translates into high capital and operating costs.
“Compressed-H 2 requires high-pressure storage vessels (type III & IV [96]) and a compression system able to handle high pressure ratios ( > 10:1), what translates into high capital and operating costs.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [96]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThis would take this technology closer to and beyond cost-effectiveness, setting it on the map of essential technologies to enable carbon neutrality by 2050.
“This would take this technology closer to and beyond cost-effectiveness, setting it on the map of essential technologies to enable carbon neutrality by 2050.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenThe operating principle of diaphragm compressors ensures oil-free and leakage-free compression with high purity of the outlet flow.
“The operating principle of diaphragm compressors ensures oil and leakage free compression with high purity of the outlet flow.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premiseown dataIsentropic compression and reversible intercooled compression differ, with the latter resembling an isothermal compression process.
“Fig. 4a shows the differences between isentropic (reversible and adiabatic) and reversible, intercooled compressions, the latter of which resembles an isothermal compression process.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisereasoningSubstances with higher energy densities, such as ammonia or syngas, can be produced using hydrogen as feedstock, which facilitates transportation but incurs higher energy losses due to the additional process.
“Other substances with higher energy densities, such as ammonia or syn-gas, can be produced using hydrogen as feedstock.This facilitates transportation but incurs higher energy losses due to the incorporation of an additional process where large amounts of energy are consumed (either as heat, mechanical power or both).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe efficiency of micro gas turbines could increase to around 40% [92,100] in the next decade and the combination of SOEC/SOFC and mGT in so-called hybrid systems would boost power generation efficiencies to values as high as 55-60% [101].
“Indeed, the efficiency of these engines could increase to around 40% [92,100] in the next decade and the combination of SOEC/SOFC and mGT in socalled hybrid systems would boost power generation efficiencies to values as high as 55e60% [101].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [92]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [100]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [101]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Rests on an assumption: Micro gas turbines can run at full capacity just a few minutes after start-up and their electric efficiency ranges from 25% for smaller units (<100 kWe) to almost 40% for larger units (≈500 kWe).
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisereasoningHydrogen compression implies large pressure ratios, typically higher than 30:1, enabled by volumetric machines such as reciprocating or diaphragm compressors.
“This implies large pressure ratios (typically higher than 30:1), enabled by volumetric machines such as reciprocating or diaphragm compressors.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisereasoningOnly liquid cryogenic or solid metal hydride storage would make a difference to hydrogen energy density, but these processes are either highly energy intensive or not suitable for large-scale hydrogen storage.
“Only liquid (cryogenic) or solid (metal hydrides) storage would make a difference but these processes are either highly energy intensive or not suitable for large-scale hydrogen storage.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe critical advantage of the mGT-P2P option over these technologies is that it is independent from geographical constraints and it can be installed almost anywhere where renewable electricity and water are available, in addition to the advantage of dealing with an energy vector as it is hydrogen.
“Additionally, the critical advantage of the mGT-P2P option over these technologies is that it is independent from geographical constraints and it can be installed almost anywhere where renewable electricity and water are available in addition to the advantage of dealing with an energy vector as it is hydrogen.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationData on CapEx of a P2P system are scarce given the early stage of development of most hydrogen technologies [94], most of them not fully commercialised yet, and when available they incorporate a large deal of uncertainty.
“Such data are nevertheless scarce given the early stage of development of most hydrogen technologies [94], most of them not fully commercialised yet, and when available they incorporate a large deal of uncertainty.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [94]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe implementation of a hydrogen liquefaction plant would expectedly have a negative impact on the total capital cost of the storage facility, even though economic aspects are not considered in this study.
“In addition, even though economic aspects are not considered in this study, the implementation of a hydrogen liquefaction plant would expectedly have a negative impact on the total capital cost of the storage facility.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Liquefied-H2 features a density of ≈78 kg/m3 and the liquefaction process is highly energy intensive.
May combine two claims.
Premiseown dataCompression work is influenced not only by inlet conditions and outlet pressure but also by compressor type and how the compression process is carried out.
“Compression work is influenced not only by inlet conditions and outlet pressure but also by compressor type and, linked to this, how the compression process is carried out.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premiseown dataThe energy density of hydrogen at ambient conditions is much lower than that of methane, ethane, methanol, or ammonia, and even at storage pressures as high as 300 bar it remains significantly lower.
“It is observed that the energy density of hydrogen at ambient conditions is much lower than that of other gases (e.g., methane, ethane), liquids (e.g., methanol) or solids (e.g., ammonia); moreover, even if the storage pressure of hydrogen were increased to values as high as 300 bar, the energy density would still be significantly lower.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationMany of the challenges in using metal hydrides are related to the thermodynamics and kinetics of dehydrogenation, which determine the hydrogen discharge rate and the heat supply needed to enable efficient hydrogen desorption.
“many of the challenges in using such materials are related to the thermodynamics and kinetics of dehydrogenation, which determine the hydrogen discharge rate and the heat supply needed to enable efficient hydrogen desorption from the metal hydride.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [73e75]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationLosses along the LH2 pathway are intrinsic to the utilisation of a cryogenic fluid; they occur during transfer between vessels and when the fluid warms due to heat transfer from the environment.
“Losses along the LH 2 pathway are intrinsic to the utilisation of a cryogenic fluid.They occur when hydrogen in these conditions is transferred between two vessels (liquefaction plant to tank-truck, tank-truck to storage station, storage station to end-user through a pump or compressor, and eventually final use in a fuel cell or other power generation device) and when the fluid is warmed up due to”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [56]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationHydrogen loading and unloading processes in metal hydrides are influenced mostly by thermodynamic and kinetic aspects.
“As such, these process are influenced by thermodynamic and kinetic aspects mostly [72].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [72]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationDiaphragm compressors compress small to medium flow rates of hydrogen efficiently and attain high to extremely high pressure ratios of more than 5000:1.
“Diaphragm compressors compress small to medium flow rates of hydrogen efficiently, attaining high to extremely high pressure ratios of more than 5000:1 [50].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [50]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
The paper relies on this without support.
Conventional power generation technologies are very reliable but feature high emissions of greenhouse gases and, in some cases, other hazardous emissions such as nuclear waste.
“These conventional power generation technologies are very reliable but they also feature high emissions of greenhouse gases (GHG) and, in some cases, other hazardous emissions like nuclear waste.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
In this study, the cooling/heating sources for metal hydride adsorption/desorption are available from waste heat streams and no additional electric power consumption is needed.
“In this study, it is considered that these cooling/heating sources are available from waste heat streams and that there is no need for additional electric power consumption.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
For the metal hydride storage case, storage is considered energy-neutral.
“Therefore, storage is considered energy-neutral and distribution takes 2% of the total energy in.”
The paper relies on this without support.
OpEx data for P2P systems are scarce, and electricity is the primary driver of OpEx, depending largely on country characteristics.
“The same applies to OpEx, for which electricity is the primary driver, depending largely on the particular characteristics of each country.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Pumped hydro storage is the only mature energy storage option today, accounting for 96% of total energy storage capacity.
“where pumped hydro storage is the only mature option today, accounting for 96% of the total energy storage capacity.”
The paper relies on this without support.
All three electrolyser types (AEC, PEMEC and SOEC) are experiencing substantial technical progress leading to better performances, larger scales and lower costs.
“they all are experiencing substantial technical progress leading to better performances, larger scales and lower costs: AEC, PEMEC and SOEC.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Liquefied-H2 features a density of ≈78 kg/m3 and the liquefaction process is highly energy intensive.
“Liquefied-H 2 features a much higher density (z 78 kg/m3) but the process to liquefy hydrogen is highly energy intensive”
The paper relies on this without support.
Metal hydrides enable the highest density among H2 storage systems (>115 kgH2/m3) but have lower hydrogen release rates than other technologies.
“Metal hydrides enable the highest density among the different H 2 storage systems ( > 115 kgH 2 /m3) but the associated hydrogen release rates are lower than for the other technologies.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Regardless of storage technology, higher H2 densities lead to lower energy cost of hydrogen transportation/distribution.
“Regardless of the storage technology, higher H 2 densities lead to lower energy cost of hydrogen transportation/distribution.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Micro gas turbines can run at full capacity just a few minutes after start-up and their electric efficiency ranges from 25% for smaller units (<100 kWe) to almost 40% for larger units (≈500 kWe).
“Indeed, micro gas turbine are able to run at full capacity just a few minutes after start-up and their electric efficiency ranges from 25% for the smaller units ( < 100 kWe) to almost 40% for engines in the larger output range (z500 kWe).”
The paper relies on this without support.
The electric efficiency of micro gas turbines is lower than fuel cells (>55%) and reciprocating internal combustion engines (>45%), but mGTs offer high grade heat for Combined Heat and Power (>250 C).
“This efficiency is lower than other power generation technologies such as fuel cells ( > 55%) or reciprocating internal combustion engines ( > 45%), but mGTs offer additional, beneficial features such as available high grade heat for Combined Heat and Power ( > 250 C).”
The paper relies on this without support.
For power-to-power energy storage solutions, three types of electrolysers (alkaline, proton exchange membrane, and solid oxide) can be used to convert surplus renewable electricity into hydrogen.
“The paper considers that, for power-to-power energy storage solutions, three types of electrolysers can be used to convert surplus renewable electricity into hydrogen: AEC, PEMEC and SOEC.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Hydrogen can be stored in three different states: compressed hydrogen, liquefied hydrogen, and metal hydride.
“This hydrogen can then be stored in three different states: compressed-H 2 , liquefied-H 2 and in the form of metal hydride”
The paper relies on this without support.
Regardless of the storage technology, higher hydrogen densities lead to lower energy costs of hydrogen transportation and distribution.
“regardless of the storage technology, higher H 2 densities lead to lower energy costs of hydrogen transportation/ distribution.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Round-trip efficiency is the critical figure of merit to determine the viability of an energy storage system.
“The paper has discussed round-trip efficiency (h round-trip ) as the critical figure of merit to determine the viability of an energy storage system.”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Abstract efficiency range excludes cases below 20%
MinorThe abstract gives a round-trip efficiency range of 22%-29%, while the analysis reports efficiencies below 20% for configurations using liquid-hydrogen storage.
“Round-trip e_ciency of P2P energy storage system with micro gas turbines between 22% and 29%.”
“efficiency lower than 20% for LH 2 and around 21e22% for compressed-H 2 or MH.”
Liquefaction plant with 11.9 kWh/kg is mislabeled B19
MinorThe text assigns 11.9 kWh/kg to case B19, whereas Table 6 assigns 11.90 kWh/kg to B18. Table 7 uses B19 for a metal-hydride storage product.
“11.9 kWh=kg H2 corresponding to case B19”
“| B18 | 24.00 | 21.00 | 1.30 | 11.90 | 2007 | [58] | |”
Round-trip efficiency varies with storage choice, not solely with electrolyser choice
MinorThe paper says differences between cases arise solely from electrolyser technology, but its SOEC results give three different efficiencies for three storage choices.
“the variations of round-trip efficiency from one case to another in Fig. 9 are brought about solely by the electrolyser technology used (AEC, PEMEC or SOEC).”
“For cases based on SOEC, the highest efficiency is obtained when hydrogen is stored in the form of MH (z29.0%),followed closely by compressed-H 2 (z27.9%), and LH 2 at a further distance (z25.6%).”
Maximum-efficiency storage option changes from metal hydrides to compressed hydrogen
MinorThe analysis reports the highest round-trip efficiency for SOEC with metal-hydride storage (about 29.0%), above compressed hydrogen (about 27.9%). The discussion and conclusions instead identify compressed-hydrogen storage as the maximum-efficiency configuration.
“Calculations for various configurations of the selected system have shown that the maximum h round-trip achievable is below 30% and this applies to a system based on the smart integration of a Solid Oxide Elecrolyser (SOEC) for H 2 production, compressed-H 2 storage and micro gas turbine (mGT).”
“For cases based on SOEC, the highest efficiency is obtained when hydrogen is stored in the form of MH (z29.0%),followed closely by compressed-H 2 (z27.9%), and LH 2 at a further distance (z25.6%).”
B18 is incorrectly identified as the lowest-power liquefaction option
MinorThe text identifies B18 as the minimum-power option, but Table 6 gives B18 a requirement of 11.90 kWh/kg and lists lower values, including 6.00 kWh/kg for B15.
“even though, interestingly, this is not the minimum value (B18).”
“| B15 | 25.00 | 22.80 | 2.00 | 6.00 | 2017 | [60,59] | |”
Cites
A comparative overview of hydrogen production processes
Nikolaidis, P., & Poullikkas, A. (2017) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2016.09.044 · Cited by 3,231 · see citing works
Hydrogen production for energy: An overview
Dawood, F., Anda, M., & Shafiullah, G. (2020) · International Journal of Hydrogen Energy · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.12.059 · Cited by 3,053 · see citing works
Bell, I. H., Wronski, J., Quoilin, S., & Lemort, V. (2014) · Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research · doi:10.1021/ie4033999 · Cited by 2,871 · see citing works
Future cost and performance of water electrolysis: An expert elicitation study
Schmidt, O., Gambhir, A., Staffell, I., Hawkes, A. D., Nelson, J., & Few, S. (2017) · International Journal of Hydrogen Energy · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.10.045 · Cited by 2,088 · see citing works
Energy storage technologies and real life applications – A state of the art review
Aneke, M., & Wang, M. (2016) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.06.097 · Cited by 1,754 · see citing works
(2017) · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.03.178 · Cited by 1,216 · see citing works
A review on compressed air energy storage: Basic principles, past milestones and recent developments
Budt, M., Wolf, D., Span, R., & Yan, J. (2016) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.02.108 · Cited by 1,204 · see citing works
Energy Technology Perspectives 2020
International Energy Agency (2020) · OECD eBooks · doi:10.1787/ab43a9a5-en · Cited by 1,071 · see citing works
Smart Energy Systems for coherent 100% renewable energy and transport solutions
Mathiesen, B. V., Lund, H., Connolly, D., Wenzel, H., Østergaard, P. A., Möller, B., Nielsen, S., Ridjan, I., Karnøe, P., Sperling, K., et al. (2015) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.01.075 · Cited by 1,067 · see citing works
Yu, X., Tang, Z., Sun, D., Ouyang, L., & Zhu, M. (2017) · Progress in Materials Science · doi:10.1016/j.pmatsci.2017.03.001 · Cited by 716 · see citing works
Power-to-Gas: Electrolysis and methanation status review
Thema, M., Bauer, F., & Sterner, M. (2019) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2019.06.030 · Cited by 653 · see citing works
Sdanghi, G., Maranzana, G., Celzard, A., & Fierro, V. (2018) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2018.11.028 · Cited by 448 · see citing works
Taamallah, S., Vogiatzaki, K., Alzahrani, F., Mokheimer, E. M. A., Habib, M. A., & Ghoniem, A. F. (2015) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.04.044 · Cited by 361 · see citing works
Lucia, U. (2013) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2013.09.025 · Cited by 360 · see citing works
Review of Power-to-Gas Projects in Europe
Wulf, C., Linßen, J., & Zapp, P. (2018) · Energy Procedia · doi:10.1016/j.egypro.2018.11.041 · Cited by 238 · see citing works
Vecchi, A., Li, Y., Ding, Y., Mancarella, P., & Sciacovelli, A. (2021) · Advances in Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.adapen.2021.100047 · Cited by 237 · see citing works
(2017) · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.01.068 · Cited by 198 · see citing works
Damo, U. M., Ferrari, M. L., Turan, A., & Massardo, A. F. (2018) · Energy · doi:10.1016/j.energy.2018.11.091 · Cited by 177 · see citing works
Chung, C.-A., Yang, S.-W., Yang, C.-Y., Hsu, C.-W., & Chiu, P.-Y. (2012) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2012.10.024 · Cited by 154 · see citing works
A study of the efficiency of hydrogen liquefaction
Baker, C. (1978) · International Journal of Hydrogen Energy · doi:10.1016/0360-3199(78)90037-x · Cited by 138 · see citing works
Novel Electrolyzer Applications: Providing More Than Just Hydrogen
Eichman, J., Harrison, K., & Peters, M. (2014) · doi:10.2172/1159377 · Cited by 137 · see citing works
Economic evaluation of hybrid off-shore wind power and hydrogen storage system
Loisel, R., Baranger, L., Chemouri, N., Spinu, S., & Pardo, S. (2015) · International Journal of Hydrogen Energy · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2015.03.117 · Cited by 136 · see citing works
Ishaq, H., Dinçer, İ., & Naterer, G. F. (2018) · International Journal of Hydrogen Energy · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.03.139 · Cited by 134 · see citing works
Large-scale hydrogen liquefier utilising mixed-refrigerant pre-cooling
Berstad, D., Stang, J., & Nekså, P. (2010) · International Journal of Hydrogen Energy · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2010.02.001 · Cited by 131 · see citing works
Meziane, S., & Bentebbiche, A. (2019) · International Journal of Hydrogen Energy · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.04.128 · Cited by 131 · see citing works
Conceptual design of a high efficiency large capacity hydrogen liquefier
Quack, H. (2002) · AIP Conference Proceedings · doi:10.1063/1.1472029 · Cited by 121 · see citing works
Han, G., Kwon, Y., Kim, J. B., Lee, S., Bae, J., Cho, E., Lee, B. J., Cho, S., & Park, J. (2019) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.114175 · Cited by 116 · see citing works
(2019) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-55504-0 · Cited by 111 · see citing works
A computational study on the combustion of hydrogen/methane blended fuels for a micro gas turbines
Shih, H.-Y., & Liu, C.-R. (2014) · International Journal of Hydrogen Energy · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2014.07.046 · Cited by 107 · see citing works
Alirahmi, S. M., Assareh, E., Chitsaz, A., Holagh, S. G., & Jalilinasrabady, S. (2021) · International Journal of Hydrogen Energy · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.05.082 · Cited by 107 · see citing works
di Gaeta, A., Reale, F., Chiariello, F., & Massoli, P. (2017) · Energy · doi:10.1016/j.energy.2017.03.173 · Cited by 99 · see citing works
Simulation of boil-off losses during transfer at a LH2 based hydrogen refueling station
Petitpas, G. (2018) · International Journal of Hydrogen Energy · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.09.132 · Cited by 98 · see citing works
Ye, Y., Ding, J., Wang, W., & Yan, J. (2021) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.117255 · Cited by 97 · see citing works
Koirala, B. P., Hers, S., Morales-España, G. A., Özdemir, Ö., Sijm, J., & Weeda, M. (2021) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.116713 · Cited by 90 · see citing works
Wang, L., Zhang, Y., Pérez–Fortes, M., Aubin, P., Lin, T.-E. L., Yang, Y., Marechal, F. M. A., & herle, J. V. (2020) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.115330 · Cited by 85 · see citing works
Motahar, S., & Alemrajabi, A. A. (2009) · International Journal of Hydrogen Energy · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2008.12.065 · Cited by 84 · see citing works
Economically viable large-scale hydrogen liquefaction
Cardella, U., Decker, L., & Klein, H. (2017) · IOP Conference Series Materials Science and Engineering · doi:10.1088/1757-899x/171/1/012013 · Cited by 77 · see citing works
Gabrielli, P., Charbonnier, F., Guidolin, A., & Mazzotti, M. (2020) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.115245 · Cited by 72 · see citing works
Mukelabai, M. D., Gillard, J., & Patchigolla, K. (2021) · International Journal of Hydrogen Energy · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.02.218 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
Design of hybrid power-to-power systems for continuous clean PV-based energy supply
Crespi, E., Colbertaldo, P., Guandalini, G., & Campanari, S. (2020) · International Journal of Hydrogen Energy · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.09.152 · Cited by 67 · see citing works
Hydrogen Storage Technologies: New Materials, Transport and Infrastructure
Godula‐Jopek, A., Jehle, W., & Wellnitz, J. (2012) · doi:10.1002/9783527649921 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
Toward Higher Micro Gas Turbine Efficiency and Flexibility—Humidified Micro Gas Turbines: A Review
Paepe, W. D., Carrero, M. M., Bram, S., Parente, A., & Contino, F. (2017) · Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power · doi:10.1115/1.4038365 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
Fundamentals of Water Electrolysis
Millet, P. (2015) · doi:10.1002/9783527676507.ch2 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
Tukenmez, N., Yılmaz, F., & Öztürk, M. (2020) · International Journal of Hydrogen Energy · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.11.054 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
A Summary of Liquid Hydrogen and Cryogenic Technologies in Japan’s WE-NET Project
Ohira, K. (2004) · AIP conference proceedings · doi:10.1063/1.1774663 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Godula‐Jopek, A. (2015) · doi:10.1002/9783527676507.ch1 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Performance benchmarking of power-to-gas plants using Composite Indicators
Heymann, F., Rüdisüli, M., Scheidt, F. V., & Camanho, A. S. (2021) · International Journal of Hydrogen Energy · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.10.189 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
A Study of the Large Hydrogen Liquefaction Process
Fukano, T., Yamashita, N., & Ohira, K. (2000) · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Bexten, T., Sieker, T., & Wirsum, M. (2021) · Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power · doi:10.1115/1.4052023 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Mokhatab, S., & Poe, W. A. (2012) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-386914-2.00011-x · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Studies of hydrogen liquefier efficiency and the recovery of the liquefaction energy
Voth, R. O., & Parrish, W. R. (1977) · doi:10.6028/nbs.ir.77-862 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Gross, R., Otto, W., Patzelt, A., & WANNER, M. (1994) · OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Heat Recovery from Natural Gas Liquefaction Process
Calabrese, M. A., Douglas, K., Orinstein, B., Vasansiri, K., & Wang, M. (2012) · ScholarlyCommons (University of Pennsylvania) · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Macchi, E., & Valenti, G. (2007) · Virtual Community of Pathological Anatomy (University of Castilla La Mancha) · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Green Hysland project planned for Mallorca
(2020) · Fuel Cells Bulletin · doi:10.1016/s1464-2859(20)30521-6 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Morante, 2020, Hidrógeno: vector energético de una economía descarbonizada, Fundación Naturgy
- Walnum, 2012, Principles for the liquefaction of hydrogen with emphasis on precooling processes, Refrigeration Science and Technology, 2012, 273
- Decker, 2008, Grosstechnische wasserstoffverflussigung in leuna, tagung; 35, deutscher kalte- und klimatechnischer verein; dkv-tagungsbericht 2008, vol. 35, 455
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Zhang, L., Jia, C., Bai, F., Wang, W., An, S., Zhao, K., Li, Z., Li, J., & Sun, H. X. (2023) · Fuel · doi:10.1016/j.fuel.2023.129455 · Cited by 678 · see citing works
Hydrogen energy systems: Technologies, trends, and future prospects
Sadeq, A. M., Homod, R. Z., Hussein, A. K., Togun, H., Mahmoodi, A., Isleem, H. F., Patil, A. R., & Moghaddam, A. H. (2024) · The Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.173622 · Cited by 544 · see citing works
A comprehensive review of green hydrogen energy systems
Kourougianni, F., Arsalis, A., Olympios, A. V., Yiasoumas, G., Konstantinou, C., Papanastasiou, P., & Georghiou, G. E. (2024) · Renewable Energy · doi:10.1016/j.renene.2024.120911 · Cited by 381 · see citing works
A review on recent trends, challenges, and innovations in alkaline water electrolysis
Emam, A. S., Hamdan, M. O., Abu-Nabah, B. A., & Elnajjar, E. (2024) · International Journal of Hydrogen Energy · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2024.03.238 · Cited by 290 · see citing works
Khan, T. A., Yu, M., & Waseem, M. (2022) · International Journal of Hydrogen Energy · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.05.263 · Cited by 274 · see citing works
Risco-Bravo, A., Varela, C., Bartels, J., & Zondervan, E. (2023) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2023.113930 · Cited by 194 · see citing works
Blue hydrogen production from natural gas reservoirs: A review of application and feasibility
Massarweh, O., Al-khuzaei, M., AlShafi, M., Biçer, Y., & Abushaikha, A. S. A. (2023) · Journal of CO2 Utilization · doi:10.1016/j.jcou.2023.102438 · Cited by 158 · see citing works
Recent progress in underground hydrogen storage
Ali, M., Isah, A., Yekeen, N. P., Hassanpouryouzband, A., Sarmadivaleh, M., Okoroafor, E. R., Kobaisi, M. A., Mahmoud, M., Vahrenkamp, V., & Hoteit, H. (2025) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/d4ee04564e · Cited by 154 · see citing works
Bampaou, M., & Panopoulos, K. D. (2024) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2024.114923 · Cited by 148 · see citing works
Jia, K., Liu, C., Li, S., & Jiang, D. (2023) · Energy Conversion and Management · doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2023.116763 · Cited by 137 · see citing works
Cozzolino, R., & Bella, G. (2024) · Frontiers in Energy Research · doi:10.3389/fenrg.2024.1358333 · Cited by 109 · see citing works
Comparison of green ammonia and green hydrogen pathways in terms of energy efficiency
Müller, M., Pfeifer, M., Holtz, D., & Müller, K. (2024) · Fuel · doi:10.1016/j.fuel.2023.129843 · Cited by 92 · see citing works
Large scale energy storage systems based on carbon dioxide thermal cycles: A critical review
Shamsi, S. S. M., Barberis, S., Maccarini, S., & Traverso, A. (2023) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2023.114245 · Cited by 84 · see citing works
Skordoulias, N., Koytsoumpa, E. I., & Karellas, S. (2022) · International Journal of Hydrogen Energy · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.06.057 · Cited by 73 · see citing works
The green hydrogen role in the global energy transformations
Algburi, S., Al-Dulaimi, O., Fakhruldeen, H. F., Khalaf, D. H., Hanoon, R. N., Jabbar, F. I., Hassan, Q., Al‐Jiboory, A. K., & Kiconco, S. (2025) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Transition · doi:10.1016/j.rset.2025.100118 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
Salam, M. A., Shaikh, M. A. A., & Ahmed, K. (2023) · Energy Reports · doi:10.1016/j.egyr.2023.02.024 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
Alonso, A. M., Matute, G., Yusta, J. M., & Coosemans, T. (2023) · International Journal of Hydrogen Energy · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2023.06.019 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
Reza, M. S., Fattah, I. M. R., Wang, J., Hannan, M. A., Zainal, B. S., Ong, H. C., & Mahlia, T. M. I. (2025) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2025.116192 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Micro Gas Turbine Role in Distributed Generation with Renewable Energy Sources
Robbio, R. D. (2023) · Energies · doi:10.3390/en16020704 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Potential utilization of hydrogen in the UAE's industrial sector
Zaiter, I., Ramadan, M., Bouabid, A., El‐Fadel, M., & Mezher, T. M. (2023) · Energy · doi:10.1016/j.energy.2023.128108 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Wang, C., Wang, H., Ji, X. H., Xu, H., Yang, C., & Meng, X. (2024) · International Journal of Hydrogen Energy · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2024.01.175 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Mati, A., Ademollo, A., & Carcasci, C. (2023) · Smart Energy · doi:10.1016/j.segy.2023.100114 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Shi, L., Wang, C., Liu, S., Cheng, X., Liu, Q., Zhuge, W., & Zhang, Y. (2023) · Journal of Energy Storage · doi:10.1016/j.est.2023.106846 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Banerjee, T., Bravo, J., Sarunac, N., D'Agostini, M., & Romero, C. E. (2024) · Energy Conversion and Management · doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2024.118473 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Electrolysers: A Review on Trends, Electrical Modeling, and Their Dynamic Responses
Tofighi‐Milani, M., Fattaheian–Dehkordi, S., & Lehtonen, M. (2025) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2025.3546546 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
“Each of these steps involves energy losses, limiting the overall round-trip efficiency to a maximum of approximately 40% [73].”
Integrating Hydrogen into Power Systems: A Comprehensive Review
Barba, J., Cañas‐Carretón, M., Carrión, M., Hernández-Labrado, G. R., Merino, C., Muñoz-Hernández, J. I., & Zárate-Miñano, R. (2025) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su17136117 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Mehr, A. S., Ilkhani, M., Sabernia, S., Nooshmand, S., Ebrahimpour, A., & Heydari, B. (2023) · Applied Thermal Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2023.121506 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Okoroafor, E. R., Nazari, N., Kim, T.-H., Watkins, H. Y., Saltzer, S. D., & Kovscek, A. R. (2024) · International Journal of Hydrogen Energy · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2024.05.239 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
“Studies [25,26] estimate the round-trip efficiency of power to power to be in the range of 18% – 46% but do not consider the contribution of subsurface storage.”
Pereira, R., Monteiro, V., Afonso, J. L., & Teixeira, J. (2024) · Energies · doi:10.3390/en17194906 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Wang, H. F., Zhao, X., Zhang, K., & Wang, W. (2022) · Sustainable Production and Consumption · doi:10.1016/j.spc.2022.08.010 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Weerakoon, A. H. S., & Assadi, M. (2025) · Energy and AI · doi:10.1016/j.egyai.2025.100483 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Youssef, A., Mallah, M., Ali, A., Shaaban, M. F., & Mohamed, E. E. M. (2023) · Energies · doi:10.3390/en16083377 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Techno-economic analysis for floating offshore wind and offshore green hydrogen
Pegler, D. L., Greaves, D. M., Rawlinson‐Smith, R., Michele, S., Conley, D., & Benhin, J. (2025) · International Journal of Hydrogen Energy · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2025.01.172 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Camargo, L., Comas, D., Escorcia, Y. C., Alviz-Meza, A., Caballero, G. E. C., & Portnoy, I. (2022) · Energies · doi:10.3390/en16010087 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Grids dominated by solar and pumped hydro in wind-constrained sunbelt countries
Weber, T., Blakers, A. W., Silalahi, D. F., Catchpole, K., & Nadolny, A. (2024) · Energy Conversion and Management · doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2024.118354 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Thermodynamic and economic analysis of a revised Graz cycle using pure oxygen and hydrogen fuel
Yu, S., Hu, B., Li, X., Ren, X., Li, Y., & Gu, C. (2023) · International Journal of Hydrogen Energy · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2023.06.157 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Study on the hydrogen barrier performance of the SiOC coating
Ke, N., Huang, H., Wang, F., Dong, B., Huang, A., Hao, L., & Xu, X. (2022) · International Journal of Hydrogen Energy · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.11.097 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Escamilla, A., Sánchez, D., & García-Rodríguez, L. (2023) · Energy Conversion and Management X · doi:10.1016/j.ecmx.2023.100368 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Self-citationWade, F., Roche, R., Chailan, A., Bertrand, V., & Paire, D. (2025) · International Journal of Hydrogen Energy · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2025.04.123 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Mathews, D., Gallachóir, B. Ó., & Deane, P. (2023) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2023.120819 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Coordinated operation strategy for hydrogen energy storage in the incremental distribution network
Wang, N., Feng, Z., & Guo, X. (2022) · International Journal of Energy Research · doi:10.1002/er.8723 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Coordinate control law analysis for hydrogen blended electricity-gas integrated energy system
Zhou, D., Jia, X., Peng, Z., & Ma, Y. (2022) · International Journal of Hydrogen Energy · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.06.274 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
A comparative sustainability assessment of several grid energy storage technologies
Aguado, R., Barros, J. J. C., de la Cruz, M. P., Coira, M. L., & del Caño, A. (2025) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2025.126248 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Duan, Z., Xu, P., Xu, C., Ding, S., & Wang, J. (2025) · Energy Conversion and Management · doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2025.120141 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Evaluating hydrogen-based electricity generation using the concept of total efficiency
Petrakopoulou, F., & Corcuera, E. G.-T. (2023) · Energy Conversion and Management · doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2023.117438 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Valant, M., & Luin, U. (2024) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.140681 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Massarweh, O., Biçer, Y., & Abushaikha, A. S. A. (2025) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-025-14686-6 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Khosravani, A., Sieving, J. K., Billings, B. W., & Powell, K. M. (2025) · Energy Reports · doi:10.1016/j.egyr.2025.11.037 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Aman, S. F., Ahmad, N., Manzoor, S., Alanazi, M. M., Abdelmohsen, S. A. M., Khosa, R. Y., Al-Sehemi, A. G., Hua, R., Alzahrani, H. A., & Chughtai, A. H. (2023) · Catalysis Surveys from Asia · doi:10.1007/s10563-023-09389-9 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Dehghani, F., & Shafiyi, M. A. (2025) · Sustainable Futures · doi:10.1016/j.sftr.2025.100814 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Song, H., Bian, H., Lin, X., & Liu, Y. (2024) · International Journal of Hydrogen Energy · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2024.11.156 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Zheng, N., Zhu, H.-T., Xiao, G., Ni, M., & Xu, H. (2023) · Energy Conversion and Management · doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2023.117573 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Khounani, Z., Razak, N. N. A., Hosseinzadeh-Bandbafha, H., Madadi, M., Sun, F. F., Mohammadi, P., Mahlia, T. M. I., Aghbashlo, M., & Tabatabaei, M. (2024) · Environmental Research · doi:10.1016/j.envres.2024.118286 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Calise, F., Cappiello, F. L., Cimmino, L., d’Accadia, M. D., & Vicidomini, M. (2025) · Energy Conversion and Management · doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2025.120115 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Performance Prediction of a Centrifugal Compressor for a Cogeneration Microturbine
Blanco-Patiño, D. F., Navia, J. A. N., Garcia-Sepulveda, J. I., & Nieto‐Londoño, C. (2022) · International Journal of Thermofluids · doi:10.1016/j.ijft.2022.100272 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Potential of Aluminum as a Metal Fuel for Supporting EU Long‐Term Energy Storage Needs
Barelli, L., Trombetti, L., Zhang, S., Ersoy, H., Baumann, M., & Passerini, S. (2024) · Advanced Materials Technologies · doi:10.1002/admt.202302206 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Montazerinejad, H., Eicker, U., & Ahmadi, P. (2024) · Energy Conversion and Management · doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2024.118944 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Weerakoon, A. H. S., & Assadi, M. (2024) · Energy Conversion and Management X · doi:10.1016/j.ecmx.2024.100750 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Zhang, X., Ma, X., Jiao, W., Hou, M., Liu, T., & Li, Q. (2025) · Energy · doi:10.1016/j.energy.2025.137665 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Green hydrogen opportunities for emerging and developing economies
Cordonnier, J., & Saygin, D. (2022) · OECD environment working papers · doi:10.1787/53ad9f22-en · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Fernandes, L. A., Machado, F., Marcon, L. R. C., & Fonseca, A. (2025) · Hydrogen · doi:10.3390/hydrogen6030072 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
“While its precise role in future energy systems remains uncertain, hydrogen is expected to contribute significantly to deep decarbonization and energy system flexibility [12,13].”
Ding, Z., Li, Y., Liu, Y., & Yu, Y. (2025) · Journal of Marine Science and Engineering · doi:10.3390/jmse13040771 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Campana, P. E., Stridh, B., Jurasz, J., Lindborg, J., Wedding, K. H., & Kander, A. (2025) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2025.126378 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Tilocca, G., Sánchez, D., & García, M. T. (2023) · Energy · doi:10.1016/j.energy.2023.127717 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Self-citationLi, Y., Han, X., Zhang, Y., Skordoulias, N., Guo, X., Yan, J., Karellas, S., & Kakaras, E. C. (2025) · International Journal of Hydrogen Energy · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2025.06.034 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Rahman, M. S., & Etminan, A. (2026) · International Journal of Hydrogen Energy · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2026.154458 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Machado, H., Ferreira, A. C., Teixeira, S., & Teixeira, J. C. (2024) · Energies · doi:10.3390/en17061414 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
$$\text {CO}_2$$-based methane: an overlooked solution for the energy transition
Servin-Balderas, I., Wetser, K., ter Heijne, A., Buisman, C. J. N., & Hamelers, H. V. M. (2024) · Energy Sustainability and Society · doi:10.1186/s13705-024-00485-w · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Emerging and maturing grid-scale energy storage technologies: A bibliometric review
Grönman, A., Sihvonen, V., & Honkapuro, S. (2024) · Journal of Energy Storage · doi:10.1016/j.est.2024.114996 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Multi-energy systems in smart cities: Infrastructure and Optimization for sustainable energy
Khatib, I. A., Ali, A., Ndiaye, M., & Shaaban, M. F. (2025) · Journal of Power Sources · doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2025.238257 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
García-Ferrero, J., Merchán, R. P., Moctezuma-Hernandez, J. A., Pérez-Gallego, D., Anvari, S., González-Ayala, J., Hernández, A. C., Roco, J. M. M., Sánchez, M. J. S., & Medina, A. (2025) · Energies · doi:10.3390/en18246596 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
“Escamilla et al. [117], within the NextMGT project, have analysed the integration of hydrogen and a MGT for renewable energy storage.”
Tilocca, G., Sánchez, D., & García, M. T. (2024) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2024.122717 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Self-citationCutillo, E. A., Tregambi, C., Bareschino, P., Mancusi, E., Continillo, G., & Pepe, F. (2024) · Energies · doi:10.3390/en17112690 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Integrating renewable energy communities and Italian UVAM project through renewable hydrogen chain
Raimondi, G., & Spazzafumo, G. (2024) · e-Prime - Advances in Electrical Engineering Electronics and Energy · doi:10.1016/j.prime.2024.100819 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
A review: compatibility of fuel cells as promising technology for DC-microgrids
Gunawardane, K., Padmawansa, N. U., & Jayasinghe, H. (2024) · Renewable Energy and Environmental Sustainability · doi:10.1051/rees/2024001 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Assessing a mixed hydrogen economy for resilient net-zero using energy system modelling
Davids, D., Grant, N., Mittal, S., Oluleye, G., & Hawkes, A. D. (2025) · International Journal of Hydrogen Energy · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2025.04.367 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Belkhiri, D., Ajaamoum, M., Outferdine, F., Idrissi, A. E., & Boulaoutaq, E. M. (2025) · e-Prime - Advances in Electrical Engineering Electronics and Energy · doi:10.1016/j.prime.2025.101089 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Raghuvanshi, S., Singh, K., Chaudhary, M., Verma, P., Singhal, S., Ali, S., Agarwal, H., Chauhan, R., Basniwal, R. K., Joshi, N. C., et al. (2025) · Energy Strategy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.esr.2025.101838 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Robbio, R. D., Cameretti, M. C., & Agizza, S. (2023) · Energies · doi:10.3390/en16207050 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Müller‐Kirchenbauer, J., Evers, M., Hollnagel, J., Kuzyaka, B., Jiang, D., Akça, O., Mielich, T., Kalz, M., & Verwiebe, P. A. (2024) · Energy Technology · doi:10.1002/ente.202300976 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Pompodakis, E. E., Ahmed, A., Orfanoudakis, G. I., & Karapidakis, E. S. (2024) · Processes · doi:10.3390/pr12091933 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Ma, S., Meng, Z., Mei, Y., Chen, M., & Jiang, Y. (2025) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app15063135 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Kavousighahfarokhi, A., Hannan, M. A., Ker, P. J., Wong, R. T. K., Ong, H. C., Begum, R. A., Hossain, M. J., & Jang, G. (2025) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2025.116379 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Innovative desalination system driven by a solar micro gas turbine for off-grid applications
González-Almenara, R., García-Rodríguez, L., Muñoz, A., Sánchez, T., & Sánchez, D. (2023) · Applied Thermal Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2023.121488 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Self-citationThe Potential for the Use of Hydrogen Storage in Energy Cooperatives
Sołtysik, M., Kozakiewicz, M., & Jasiński, J. (2024) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app14219753 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Zhou, Z., Cui, J., Liu, Z., Yang, J., Sun, Y., Yin, C., Xue, Z., Niu, J., Liu, J., Wu, K. M., et al. (2025) · Journal of Materials Chemistry A · doi:10.1039/d4ta07207c · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Banasiak, D., & Kienberger, T. (2024) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2024.123639 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Sun, H., Seto, E., Li, M., & Liu, J. (2024) · Journal of Materials Chemistry A · doi:10.1039/d4ta06071g · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Trombetti, L., Passerini, S., & Barelli, L. (2026) · Advanced Energy Materials · doi:10.1002/aenm.202505514 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
“%) further exacerbates these constraints when deployed for power-to-power applications [38].”
Raggio, M., Ferrari, M. L., & Silvestri, P. (2024) · Applied Thermal Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2024.124889 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Integrated Fuel Cell and Electrolyzer Systems for Renewable Energy Storage and Conversion
Jayasree, S., Hemamalini, V., Bansal, S., Al-Farouni, M., Chaudhari, R. J., Landage, M., & Babu, D. S. (2024) · E3S Web of Conferences · doi:10.1051/e3sconf/202459105004 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
“The findings will contribute to the development of sustainable energy storage solutions, supporting the global shift toward renewable energy[6-9].”
Swappable green hydrogen trailers as an additional energy source to electric minibus taxis
Giliomee, J. H., Zenner, T., & Booysen, M. J. (2023) · African Transport Studies · doi:10.1016/j.aftran.2023.100001 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Yilmaz, E., Carayon, G., Garmadi, S., McCaig, P., Parsania, N., Witzel, B., Hermeth, S., Beesley, B., Ferroudj, F., Skordoulias, N., et al. (2025) · E3S Web of Conferences · doi:10.1051/e3sconf/202566301013 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Salmelin, M., Inkeri, E., Sridhar, A., Honkapuro, S., & Lassila, J. (2025) · Energy · doi:10.1016/j.energy.2025.139318 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Sharevska, M., Sharevska, M., Hoogsteen, G., Hurink, J. L., Pozarlik, A. K., Katsourinis, D. I., Giannopoulos, D., Founti, M. A., & Hajimolana, Y. S. (2025) · Energy · doi:10.1016/j.energy.2025.139424 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Análisis del entorno externo para explorar el futuro del hidrógeno
Delgado, M. Á. (2024) · Ambiociencias · doi:10.18002/ambioc.i21.8181 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Ye, Z., Ding, Z., Liu, Y., & Yu, Y. (2025) · Energy Reports · doi:10.1016/j.egyr.2025.12.022 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
del Valle, A. G., Gagliardi, G. G., Borello, D., & Venturini, P. (2025) · Energies · doi:10.3390/en18246617 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Lee, G., Masri, A. R., & Lee, K. (2025) · International Journal of Hydrogen Energy · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2025.151398 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Empowering sustainability assessment of energy storage
Ersoy, H., Baumann, M., Erakca, M., Jasper, F. B., Ferraro, M., Pechancová, V., Stuhm, P., Cellura, M., Longo, S., Maniscalco, M. P., et al. (2025) · Sustainable Energy & Fuels · doi:10.1039/d5se00750j · Cited by 2 · see citing works
- Authors
- Escamilla, A., Sánchez, D., & García-Rodríguez, L.
- Affiliations
- Universidad de Sevilla (ES)
- Corresponding author
- Escamilla, Antonio
- Venue
- International Journal of Hydrogen Energy
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2022-05
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 40
- Pages
- 17505-17525
- ISSN
- 0360-3199 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4224007010
- Semantic Scholar
- c5b4a40c0280bd1233dfd7e4e2c2fdafce1f5558
- Cited by
- 143
- References
- 52
- Citations by year
- 2026: 22 · 2025: 45 · 2024: 36 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 9
- FWCI
- 5.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- International Journal of Hydrogen Energy (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- idUS (Universidad de Sevilla) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Funders
- Universidad de Sevilla (2019/00000359)
- European Commission
- Horizon 2020 (861079)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Energy › Energy Engineering and Power Technology › Hybrid Renewable Energy Systems
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Chemical Looping and Thermochemical Processes
- Physical Sciences › Energy › Energy Engineering and Power Technology › Power Systems and Renewable Energy
- Keywords
- power-to-power, round-trip efficiency, hydrogen energy storage, micro gas turbine, water electrolysis, solid oxide electrolysis, metal hydride hydrogen storage, compressed hydrogen, liquefied hydrogen, fuel cell electric trucks, hydrogen distribution, renewable energy storage, proton exchange membrane electrolyzer, alkaline electrolyzer
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-30.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-30.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review