Cited by 26Antibiotic Use and ResistancePharmacy and Medical PracticesAntibiotic Resistance in Bacteria

Antimicrobial storage and antibiotic knowledge in the community: A cross-sectional pilot study in north-western Angola

Open access
Cortez, Joana, Rosário, Edite, Pires, João E., Taborda Lopes, João, Francisco, Moisés, Vlieghe, Erika, Brito, Miguel·2017·International Journal of Infectious Diseases

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Antimicrobials are drugs that were once lifesavers and mainly curative. Nowadays their value is increasingly under pressure because of the rapid and worldwide emergence of antimicrobial resistance, which, in low-resource settings, frequently occurs in microorganisms that are likely to be transmitted in the community. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional pilot study including 102 households within the 10th Health and Demographic Surveillance System round in Dande, Bengo Province, Angola. RESULTS: Of the total 102 households piloted, 79 (77.45%) were urban. Fifty-seven respondents were female (56.44%), and the mean age of the respondents was 39.70±15.35years. Overall, storage of antimicrobials was found in 55/102 households (53.92%). More than 66% of the antimicrobials stored were prescribed by a health professional and the majority of antimicrobials were bought at pharmacies or at a street market. Penicillin and its derivatives, antimalarial drugs, and metronidazole were the antimicrobials most frequently stored. Households with female respondents reported storing any drugs at home more frequently (82.50%; p=0.002) and also storing antimicrobials more frequently (64.91%; p=0.016) as compared to households with male respondents. Reported use of antimicrobials was significantly higher in urban households (60.76%, 48/79) as compared to rural households (30.43%, 7/23) (p=0.010). Overall, 74 of 101 respondents (73.26%) reported having already heard about antibiotics. The common reasons given for their use were cough and other respiratory symptoms, wounds, flu and body muscle pain, fever, bladder complaints, and diarrhoea and/or presumed typhoid fever. Nearly 40% (28/74) of the respondents thought that antibiotics should be stopped as soon as the person does not feel sick anymore. CONCLUSIONS: Community interventions for appropriate use of antibiotics should be designed with a special focus on women. This should be done through public awareness campaigns and improving access to reliable medical services. Drug prescribers are key not only to appropriate antimicrobial prescription, but also to adequate dispensing, and are strong advocates for the possible misconceptions on antimicrobial usage by lay people.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijid.2017.05.011

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Biswas M, Roy MN, Manik MI, Hossain MS, Tapu SM, Moniruzzaman M, et al. Self medicated antibiotics in Bangladesh: a cross-sectional health survey conducted in the Rajshahi City. BMC Public Health 2014b;14:847.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cortez, J., Rosário, E., Pires, J. E., Taborda Lopes, J., Francisco, M., Vlieghe, E., & Brito, M.
Affiliations
  • Centro de Investigação em Saúde de Angola (AO)
  • World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe (DK)
  • Ministry of Health (AO)
  • University of Antwerp (BE)
  • Universidade Politécnica de Lisboa (PT)
Corresponding author
Cortez, Joana
Venue
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-07
Volume
60
Pages
83-87
ISSN
1201-9712 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2617631174
Cited by
26
References
38
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2018: 3
FWCI
1.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Infectious Diseases (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • World Health Organization
  • Ministério da Saúde
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology › Antibiotic Use and Resistance
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmacology › Pharmacy and Medical Practices
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Medicine › Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria
Keywords
antimicrobial resistance, antibiotic knowledge, household drug storage, antibiotic misuse, self-medication, gender differences in drug use, urban-rural differences, penicillin, antimalarial drugs, metronidazole, public awareness campaigns, resource-limited settings
MeSH terms
Adult, Angola, Anti-Infective Agents, Anti-Bacterial Agents, Cross-Sectional Studies, Drug Resistance, Microbial, Drug Storage, Family Characteristics, Female, Humans, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Male, Middle Aged, Pilot Projects, Rural Population, Socioeconomic Factors, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review