Cited by 947Antibiotic Use and ResistanceAntibiotic Resistance in BacteriaPharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts

Non-prescription antimicrobial use worldwide: a systematic review

Open access
Morgan, Daniel J, Okeke, Iruka N, Laxminarayan, Ramanan, Perencevich, Eli N, Weisenberg, Scott·2011·The Lancet Infectious Diseases

Abstract

In much of the world antimicrobial drugs are sold without prescription or oversight by health-care professionals. The scale and effect of this practice is unknown. We systematically reviewed published works about non-prescription antimicrobials from 1970-2009, identifying 117 relevant articles. 35 community surveys from five continents showed that non-prescription use occurred worldwide and accounted for 19-100% of antimicrobial use outside of northern Europe and North America. Safety issues associated with non-prescription use included adverse drug reactions and masking of underlying infectious processes. Non-prescription use was common for non-bacterial disease, and antituberculosis drugs were available in many areas. Antimicrobial-resistant bacteria are common in communities with frequent non-prescription use. In a few settings, control efforts that included regulation decreased antimicrobial use and resistance. Non-prescription antimicrobial and antituberculosis use is common outside of North America and northern Europe and must be accounted for in public health efforts to reduce antimicrobial resistance.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s1473-3099(11)70054-8

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Morgan, D. J., Okeke, I. N., Laxminarayan, R., Perencevich, E. N., & Weisenberg, S.
Affiliations
  • University of Maryland, Baltimore (US)
  • Haverford College (US)
  • Center for Disease Dynamics, Economics & Policy (US)
  • University of Iowa (US)
  • Alta Bates Summit Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Morgan, Daniel J
Venue
The Lancet Infectious Diseases
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-09
Volume
11
Issue
9
Pages
692-701
ISSN
1473-3099 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2100353213
Cited by
947
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 44 · 2025: 64 · 2024: 71 · 2023: 92 · 2022: 76 · 2021: 99 · 2020: 126 · 2019: 81 · 2018: 88 · 2017: 65 · 2016: 40 · 2015: 29 · 2014: 34 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 20
FWCI
2.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Lancet Infectious Diseases (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (K08HS018111, 1 K08 HS18111-01)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology › Antibiotic Use and Resistance
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Medicine › Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Pharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts
Keywords
antimicrobial resistance, antitubercular agents, adverse drug reactions, antimicrobial use regulation, community survey
MeSH terms
Anti-Bacterial Agents, Drug Resistance, Microbial, Nonprescription Drugs, Humans, Internationality

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review