The DOI matches its Crossref record; 13 of the 13 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The adoption of M-government services from the user’s perspectives: Empirical evidence from the United Arab Emirates
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology
Davis, F. D. (1989) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/249008 · Cited by 68,483
Venkatesh, V., Thong, J. Y. L., & Xu, X. (2012) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/41410412 · Cited by 15,756
Technology Acceptance Model 3 and a Research Agenda on Interventions
Venkatesh, V., & Bala, H. (2008) · Decision Sciences · doi:10.1111/j.1540-5915.2008.00192.x · Cited by 8,159 · cited 2×
“…researcher have expended the TAM model; notably Expectation-Confirmation Model and the TAM (Chong, 2013), TAM2 (Venkatesh & Davis, 2000), TAM3 (Venkatesh & Bala, 2008), and Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT1 and UTAUT2) (Venkatesh et al., 2003, 2012), but household…”
MethodTesting moderator and mediator effects in counseling psychology research.
Frazier, P. A., Tix, A. P., & Barron, K. E. (2004) · Journal of Counseling Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0167.51.1.115 · Cited by 4,037 · cited 1×
“To measure the moderating effects of demographic variables of gender, age and average monthly household income, the dichotomous variables were coded into dummy variables following the procedure proposed by Frazier, Tix, and Barron (2004).”
MethodThe Performance of RMSEA in Models With Small Degrees of Freedom
Kenny, D. A., Kaniskan, B., & McCoach, D. B. (2015) · Sociological Methods & Research · doi:10.1177/0049124114543236 · Cited by 2,841
The adequacy of response rates to online and paper surveys: what can be done?
Nulty, D. D. (2008) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602930701293231 · Cited by 2,581
Gefen, D., & Straub, D. W. (2004) · Omega · doi:10.1016/j.omega.2004.01.006 · Cited by 2,025
Peng, D. X., & Lai, F. (2012) · Journal of Operations Management · doi:10.1016/j.jom.2012.06.002 · Cited by 1,532
Effect of the number of variables on measures of fit in structural equation modeling
Kenny, D. A., & McCoach, D. B. (2003) · Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal · doi:10.1207/s15328007sem1003_1 · Cited by 1,231
Comparing Response Rates from Web and Mail Surveys: A Meta-Analysis
Shih, T.-H., & Fan, X. (2008) · Field Methods · doi:10.1177/1525822x08317085 · Cited by 1,159
Cited by
A meta-analysis of antecedents and consequences of trust in mobile commerce
Sarkar, S., Chauhan, S., & Khare, A. (2020) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.08.008 · Cited by 375
Tsai, J.-M., Cheng, M.-J., Tsai, H.-H., Hung, S.-W., & Chen, Y.-L. (2019) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.03.003 · Cited by 257
Acceptance of 5 G technology: Mediation role of Trust and Concentration
Akbari, M., Rezvani, A., Shahriari, E., Zúñiga, M. Á., & Pouladian, H. (2020) · Journal of Engineering and Technology Management · doi:10.1016/j.jengtecman.2020.101585 · Cited by 72
Wang, Y., Zhu, J., Liu, R., & Jiang, Y. (2024) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2024.102755 · Cited by 43
Metadata
- Authors
- Ahmad, S. Z., & Khalid, K.
- Venue
- International Journal of Information Management
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2017-10
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 367-379
- ISSN
- 0268-4012 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2615885900
- Cited by
- 182
- References
- 13
- FWCI
- 25.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The adoption of M-government services from the user’s perspectives: Empirical evidence from the United Arab Emirates. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2017.03.008
- The paper
- Ahmad, S. Z., & Khalid, K. (2017). The adoption of M-government services from the user’s perspectives: Empirical evidence from the United Arab Emirates. International Journal of Information Management. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2017.03.008
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
