The DOI matches its Crossref record; 112 of the 112 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The battle of Brain vs. Heart: A literature review and meta-analysis of “hedonic motivation” use in UTAUT2
Open accessAbstract
Abstract Much of the scholarly debate on the extrinsic-intrinsic motivation dichotomy to date has focused on organisational context. However, the recent upsurge of technology use amongst individuals in non-organisational context has led to consumer-focused research model such as extended unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT2). The objective of this study is to bring back much needed focus on motivation dichotomy from the consumer perspective. This involved a systematic review and meta-analysis of hedonic motivation an affective construct in UTAUT2 studies. The findings from 79 UTAUT2 empirical studies revealed that only 46 studies (58%) utilised hedonic motivation while the remaining 33 studies (42%) omitted the construct. Extrinsic motivation was the major driver of non-hedonic and non-significant hedonic motivation studies with individuals using technologies for utilitarian outcomes. Unlike UTAUT2, moderators association of hedonic motivation were non-significant in determining consumer intention to use technology. The findings also revealed an important association between hedonic motivation and effort expectancy, in addition to fruitful directions for research and practice.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology
Davis, F. D. (1989) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/249008 · Cited by 68,483
User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward A Unified View1
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/30036540 · Cited by 45,035
Venkatesh, V., Thong, J. Y. L., & Xu, X. (2012) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/41410412 · Cited by 15,756
Venkatesh, V. (2000) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.11.4.342.11872 · Cited by 6,664
Extrinsic and Intrinsic Motivation to Use Computers in the Workplace 1
Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1992) · Journal of Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.1992.tb00945.x · Cited by 6,231 · cited 4×
“Prior researchers has well established the role of hedonic motivation in predicting behavioural intention (Davis et al., 1992; Van der Heijden, 2004).”
BackgroundInfluentialPrimary, Secondary, and Meta-Analysis of Research
GLASS, G. V. (1976) · Educational Researcher · doi:10.3102/0013189x005010003 · Cited by 4,890 · cited 2×
“…in comparison to social and behavioural sciences; IS researchers scarcely employ meta-analysis – a quantitative literature synthesis technique used in mature research streams for knowledge accumulation through integration of results from findings of previous studies (Glass, 1976; King & He, 2005).”
ResultUser Acceptance of Hedonic Information Systems1
van der Heijden, H. (2004) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/25148660 · Cited by 3,850
Toward a hierarchical model of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation
Vallerand, R. J. (1997) · Advances in experimental social psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60019-2 · Cited by 3,198 · cited 1×
“Researchers found motivation of individuals to perform an activity was of dichotomous nature namely extrinsic and intrinsic motivation (Deci & Ryan, 1980; Vallerand, 1997).”
BackgroundA meta-analysis of the technology acceptance model
King, W. R., & He, J. (2006) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/j.im.2006.05.003 · Cited by 2,906
Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology: A Synthesis and the Road Ahead
University of Arkansas, Venkatesh, V., Thong, J., Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Xu, X., & The Hong Kong Polytechnic University (2016) · Journal of the Association for Information Systems · doi:10.17705/1jais.00428 · Cited by 2,513
Cited by
Dwivedi, Y. K., Hughes, L., Ismagilova, E., Aarts, G., Coombs, C., Crick, T., Duan, Y., Dwivedi, R., Edwards, J., Eirug, A., et al. (2021) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.08.002 · Cited by 4,611
Self-citationPrescriptive analytics: Literature review and research challenges
Lepenioti, K., Bousdekis, A., Apostolou, D., & Mentzas, G. (2020) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.04.003 · Cited by 501
“…& Lin, 2018; Seifert, Seifert, & Protopappa-Sieke, 2013), while similar methodologies have been followed in other domains (Duan, Edwards, & Dwivedi, 2019; Ismagilova, Hughes, Dwivedi, & Raman, 2019; Koivisto & Hamari, 2019; Senyo, Liu, & Effah, 2019; Tamilmani, Rana, Prakasam, & Dwivedi, 2019).”
A meta-analysis of antecedents and consequences of trust in mobile commerce
Sarkar, S., Chauhan, S., & Khare, A. (2020) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.08.008 · Cited by 375
Consumer Acceptance and Use of Information Technology: A Meta-Analytic Evaluation of UTAUT2
Tamilmani, K., Rana, N. P., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2021) · Information Systems Frontiers · doi:10.1007/s10796-020-10007-6 · Cited by 341
Self-citationDwivedi, Y. K., Rana, N. P., Tamilmani, K., & Raman, R. (2020) · Current Opinion in Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2020.03.008 · Cited by 266
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Tamilmani, K., Rana, N. P., Prakasam, N., & Dwivedi, Y. K.
- Venue
- International Journal of Information Management
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-06
- Volume
- 46
- Pages
- 222-235
- ISSN
- 0268-4012 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2912834942
- Cited by
- 371
- References
- 112
- FWCI
- 8.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The battle of Brain vs. Heart: A literature review and meta-analysis of “hedonic motivation” use in UTAUT2. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.01.008
- The paper
- Tamilmani, K., Rana, N. P., Prakasam, N., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2019). The battle of Brain vs. Heart: A literature review and meta-analysis of “hedonic motivation” use in UTAUT2. International Journal of Information Management. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.01.008
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
