Cited by 187COVID-19 Digital Contact TracingPrivacy, Security, and Data ProtectionPrivacy-Preserving Technologies in Data

COVID-19, digital privacy, and the social limits on data-focused public health responses

Open access
Fahey, Robert A., Hino, Airo·2020·International Journal of Information Management

Abstract

The implementation of digital contact tracing applications around the world to help reduce the spread of the COVID-19 pandemic represents one of the most ambitious uses of massive-scale citizen data ever attempted. There is major divergence among nations, however, between a "privacy-first" approach which protects citizens' data at the cost of extremely limited access for public health authorities and researchers, and a "data-first" approach which stores large amounts of data which, while of immeasurable value to epidemiologists and other researchers, may significantly intrude upon citizens' privacy. The lack of a consensus on privacy protection in the contact tracing process creates risks of non-compliance or deliberate obfuscation from citizens who fear revealing private aspects of their lives - a factor greatly exacerbated by recent major scandals over online privacy and the illicit use of citizens' digital information, which have heightened public consciousness of these issues and created significant new challenges for any collection of large-scale public data. While digital contact tracing for COVID-19 remains in its infancy, the lack of consensus around best practices for its implementation and for reassuring citizens of the protection of their privacy may already have impeded its capacity to contribute to the pandemic response.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102181

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • For many people in developing countries the digital divide is most apparent due to social and cultural barriers reinforced by poverty and a lack of education amongst the population.

    “For many people in developing countries the digital divide is most apparent due to social and cultural barriers reinforced by poverty and a lack of education amongst the population (Barnes 2020;De et al. 2020;Fahey et al. 2020).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 9 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fahey, R. A., & Hino, A.
Affiliations
Waseda University (JP)
Corresponding author
Hino, Airo
Venue
International Journal of Information Management
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-12
Volume
55
Pages
102181
ISSN
0268-4012 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3038461398
Cited by
187
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 32 · 2022: 50 · 2021: 55 · 2020: 16
FWCI
36.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Information Management (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (20KK0026, 18H03642, 18K01423, 20H00066, 17H00971)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › COVID-19 Digital Contact Tracing
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
Keywords
COVID-19 pandemic, digital contact tracing, digital privacy, public health data, research data access, privacy compliance, pandemic response

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review