Enhancing academic integrity among students in GenAI Era:A holistic framework
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Some universities have introduced mandatory AI disclosure policies, requiring students to declare their use of AI in assignments to promote transparency and accountability.
“To address this challenge, some universities have introduced mandatory AI disclosure poli -cies, requiring students to declare their use of AI in assign -ments to promote transparency and accountability [ 56, 69].”
From Redefining student assessment in AI-infused learning environments: a systematic review of challenges and strategies for academic integrity (2026) · cites this paper as [69]
Multi-stage assignments, where students submit drafts before finalising their work, allow educators to track students' learning progress and interaction with AI throughout the assessment process, making it more difficult to misuse AI tools.
“A structured approach to assessment redesign has led to multi-stage assignments, where students submit drafts before finalising their work [ 70]. This method allows educators to track students' learning progress and interaction with AI throughout the assessment process, making it more difficult to misuse AI tools [ 68, 69, 82 ].”
From Redefining student assessment in AI-infused learning environments: a systematic review of challenges and strategies for academic integrity (2026) · cites this paper as [69]
Cites
Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2019) · International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education · doi:10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0 · Cited by 7,242 · see citing works
Chatting and cheating: Ensuring academic integrity in the era of ChatGPT
Cotton, D. R. E., Cotton, P. A., & Shipway, J. R. (2024) · Innovations in Education and Teaching International · doi:10.1080/14703297.2023.2190148 · Cited by 3,087 · see citing works
Chatting and Cheating. Ensuring academic integrity in the era of ChatGPT
Cotton, D., Cotton, P., & Shipway, J. R. (2023) · doi:10.35542/osf.io/mrz8h · Cited by 3,079 · see citing works
Baidoo-Anu, D., & Owusu Ansah, L. (2023) · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4337484 · Cited by 3,004 · see citing works
Experimental evidence on the productivity effects of generative artificial intelligence
Noy, S., & Zhang, W. (2023) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.adh2586 · Cited by 2,150 · see citing works
Artificial intelligence in higher education: the state of the field
Crompton, H., & Burke, D. (2023) · International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education · doi:10.1186/s41239-023-00392-8 · Cited by 2,010 · see citing works
A comprehensive AI policy education framework for university teaching and learning
Chan, C. K. Y. (2023) · International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education · doi:10.1186/s41239-023-00408-3 · Cited by 1,577 · see citing works
Feuerriegel, S., Hartmann, J., Janiesch, C., & Zschech, P. (2024) · Business & Information Systems Engineering · doi:10.1007/s12599-023-00834-7 · Cited by 1,409 · see citing works
Generative AI and ChatGPT: applications, challenges, and AI-human collaboration
Fui-Hoon Nah, F., Zheng, R., Cai, J., Siau, K., & Chen, L. (2023) · Journal of Information Technology Case and Application Research · doi:10.1080/15228053.2023.2233814 · Cited by 1,363 · see citing works
Lim, W. M., Gunasekara, A., Pallant, J. L., Pallant, J. I., & Pechenkina, E. (2023) · The International Journal of Management Education · doi:10.1016/j.ijme.2023.100790 · Cited by 1,261 · see citing works
ChatGPT for Education and Research: Opportunities, Threats, and Strategies
Rahman, M. M., & Watanobe, Y. (2023) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app13095783 · Cited by 1,080 · see citing works
Revolutionizing education with AI: Exploring the transformative potential of ChatGPT
Adiguzel, T., Kaya, M. H., & Cansu, F. K. (2023) · Contemporary Educational Technology · doi:10.30935/cedtech/13152 · Cited by 975 · see citing works
Chiu, T. K. F. (2024) · Interactive Learning Environments · doi:10.1080/10494820.2023.2253861 · Cited by 852 · see citing works
Southworth, J., Migliaccio, K., Glover, J., Glover, J., Reed, D., McCarty, C., Brendemuhl, J., & Thomas, A. (2023) · Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100127 · Cited by 647 · see citing works
The role of ChatGPT in higher education: Benefits, challenges, and future research directions
(2023) · Journal of Applied Learning & Teaching · doi:10.37074/jalt.2023.6.1.29 · Cited by 561 · see citing works
Self-citationThe opportunities and challenges of ChatGPT in education
Adeshola, I., & Adepoju, A. P. (2024) · Interactive Learning Environments · doi:10.1080/10494820.2023.2253858 · Cited by 517 · see citing works
Carolus, A., Koch, M. J., Straka, S., Latoschik, M. E., & Wienrich, C. (2023) · Computers in Human Behavior: Artificial Humans · doi:10.1016/j.chbah.2023.100014 · Cited by 488 · see citing works
Computer-based technology and student engagement: a critical review of the literature
Schindler, L. A., Burkholder, G. J., Morad, O. A., & Marsh, C. (2017) · International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education · doi:10.1186/s41239-017-0063-0 · Cited by 475 · see citing works
Generative AI tools and assessment: Guidelines of the world's top-ranking universities
Moorhouse, B. L., Yeo, M. A., & Wan, Y. (2023) · Computers and Education Open · doi:10.1016/j.caeo.2023.100151 · Cited by 461 · see citing works
Use of ChatGPT in academia: Academic integrity hangs in the balance
Bin-Nashwan, S. A., Sadallah, M., & Bouteraa, M. (2023) · Technology in Society · doi:10.1016/j.techsoc.2023.102370 · Cited by 394 · see citing works
Luo (Jess), J. (2024) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2024.2309963 · Cited by 366 · see citing works
A large-scale comparison of human-written versus ChatGPT-generated essays
Herbold, S., Hautli-Janisz, A., Heuer, U., Kikteva, Z., & Trautsch, A. (2023) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-023-45644-9 · Cited by 338 · see citing works
Martin, F., Chen, Y., Moore, R. L., & Westine, C. D. (2020) · Educational Technology Research and Development · doi:10.1007/s11423-020-09793-2 · Cited by 306 · see citing works
Laupichler, M. C., Aster, A., Haverkamp, N., & Raupach, T. (2023) · Computers in Human Behavior Reports · doi:10.1016/j.chbr.2023.100338 · Cited by 269 · see citing works
Perkins, M., Roe, J., Postma, D., McGaughran, J., & Hickerson, D. (2024) · Journal of Academic Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10805-023-09492-6 · Cited by 234 · see citing works
Artificial intelligence and increasing misinformation
Monteith, S., Glenn, T., Geddes, J. R., Whybrow, P. C., Achtyes, E., & Bauer, M. (2024) · The British Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1192/bjp.2023.136 · Cited by 208 · see citing works
Kelly, A., Sullivan, M., & Strampel, K. (2023) · Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice · doi:10.53761/1.20.6.12 · Cited by 177 · see citing works
Contrino, M. F., Reyes-Millán, M., Vázquez-Villegas, P., & Membrillo-Hernández, J. (2024) · Smart Learning Environments · doi:10.1186/s40561-024-00292-y · Cited by 158 · see citing works
Li, T., Ji, Y., & Zhan, Z. (2024) · Asia Pacific Journal of Education · doi:10.1080/02188791.2024.2305163 · Cited by 133 · see citing works
Race with the machines: assessing the capability of generative AI in solving authentic assessments
Nguyen Thanh, B., Vo, D. T. H., Nguyen Nhat, M., Pham, T. T. T., Thai Trung, H., & Ha Xuan, S. (2023) · Australasian Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.14742/ajet.8902 · Cited by 87 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Bai, Y., & Wang, S. (2025) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-025-08697-6 · Cited by 86 · see citing works
Generative AI and educational assessments: a systematic review
Graduate School of Education, T. U. O. W. A., Zhao, J., Chapman, E., Sabet, P. G. P., & Global Curtin, C. U. (2024) · Education Research and Perspectives · doi:10.70953/erpv51.2412006 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
Ncube, P. D. N., Dzvapatsva, G. P., Matobobo, C., & Ranga, M. M. (2026) · AI and Ethics · doi:10.1007/s43681-025-00871-w · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Kangwa, D., Msafiri, M. M., & Fute, A. (2025) · Journal of Computer Assisted Learning · doi:10.1111/jcal.70109 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Thinking to learn: managing the risks of outsourcing to GenAI
Chase, A.-M., & Galvin, K. (2026) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2026.2620055 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
- Authors
- Rasul, T., Nair, S., Kalendra, D., Balaji, M. S., Santini, F. D. O., Ladeira, W. J., Rather, R. A., Yasin, N., Rodriguez, R. V., Kokkalis, P., Murad, M. W., & Hossain, M. U.
- Affiliations
- Australian Institute of Business (AU)
- École Supérieure de Commerce de Rennes (FR)
- Woxsen School of Business (IN)
- Abu Dhabi School of Management (AE)
- Rochester Institute of Technology - Dubai (AE)
- University of South Australia (AU)
- Putra Business School (MY)
- Corresponding author
- Balaji, M.S.
- ORCID
- Venue
- The International Journal of Management Education
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2024-11
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 101041
- ISSN
- 1472-8117 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4401559416
- Cited by
- 82
- References
- 30
- Citations by year
- 2026: 40 · 2025: 39 · 2024: 3
- FWCI
- 34.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- The International Journal of Management Education (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Academic integrity and plagiarism
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Artificial Intelligence in Education
- Social Sciences › Law › Legal Issues in Education
- Keywords
- academic integrity, generative AI, higher education, AI policy, ethical use of AI, cooperative learning, student misbehavior
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
