Cited by 26Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsDigital Mental Health InterventionsMobile Health and mHealth Applications

Development and initial evaluation of a mobile application to help with mindfulness training and practice

Plaza García, Inmaculada, Sánchez, Carlos Medrano, Espílez, Ángel Sánchez, García-Magariño, Iván, Guillén, Guillermo Azuara, García-Campayo, Javier·2017·International Journal of Medical Informatics

Abstract

Background and objective Different review articles support the usefulness and effectiveness of mindfulness techniques in health and wellbeing. In this paper we present a first prototype of a mobile application to help with the training and practice of mindfulness, taking into account the lacks detected in a previous literature review. Our aim was to measure acceptance and perceived quality, as well as gather data about app usage. Their dependence on demographic variables and the change in mindful level was also measured. Materials and methods Two versions of a new application were developed, "Mindfulness" and "Mindfulness Sci". The application has been tested in two pilot studies: in traditional face-to-face mindfulness groups and in individual and independent use. Results 3977 users were involved in this study: 26 in the first trial during an 8-week usage period and 3951 in the second trial during 17 months. In the first study, participants assessed the app with high scores. They considered it as a helping tool for mindfulness practice, user-friendly and with high quality of use. The positive perception was maintained after 8-weeks meditation workshops, and participants considered that its use could contribute to obtain benefits for mental and physical health. In the second study, we found rather weak associations between usage time and age, nationality and educational level. The mindful level showed a weak positive correlation with the session accomplished but slightly abov…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2017.05.018

Cites

57 of 57 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 58 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Plaza García, I., Sánchez, C. M., Espílez, Á. S., García-Magariño, I., Guillén, G. A., & García-Campayo, J.
Affiliations
Universidad de Zaragoza (ES)
Venue
International Journal of Medical Informatics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-09
Volume
105
Pages
59-67
ISSN
1386-5056 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2619659476
Cited by
25
References
58
Citations by year
2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 6
FWCI
4.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Medical Informatics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • European Social Fund
  • Gobierno de Aragón
  • Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad (TEC2013-50049-EXP)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
Keywords
mindfulness, mobile application, mindfulness training, meditation, app acceptance, perceived quality, app usage patterns, health and well-being
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Stress, Psychological, Program Development, Meditation, Mobile Applications, Mindfulness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review