The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
An update on recent developments in the prevention and treatment of Staphylococcus aureus biofilms
Abstract
Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) readily forms biofilms on prosthetic devices such as the pacemakers, heart valves, orthopaedic implants, and indwelling catheters. Its biofilms are recalcitrant to antibiotic therapy and pose a serious burden in the healthcare setting as they drastically increase the treatment cost and morbidity of the patient. Prevention and treatment of staphylococcal biofilms has therefore been an area of active research for the past two decades. While catheters coated with different antiseptics and antibiotics capable of preventing S. aureus biofilm formation have been developed, an effective therapy for the dispersal and treatment of established staphylococcal biofilms is not yet available. Hence, many studies have focused on developing novel therapeutic strategies that can tackle established S. aureus biofilm associated infections. This has led to the identification of different phytochemicals (e.g., tannic acid, ellagic acid, xanthohumol etc), enzymes (e.g., Dnases, lysostaphin, α-amylase, hyaluronidase and proteases etc.), sulfahydrl compounds (e.g., dithiothreitol, 2-mercaptoethanol), nanoparticles (e.g., gold, silver, iron, copper and selenium), phage cocktails, antibodies and metal chelators. Apart from the conventional techniques, the therapeutic effects of ultra sound, shock waves and photodynamic therapy for treating S. aureus biofilms are also being investigated. Clinical validation of these studies will equip the medical field with alternate preventive and treatment methods against staphylococcal biofilm infections. This review provides recent updates on the preventive and therapeutic strategies explored to eradicate staphylococcal biofilm formation and related infections.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Biofilms: an emergent form of bacterial life
Flemming, H.-C., Wingender, J., Szewzyk, U., Steinberg, P., Rice, S. A., & Kjelleberg, S. (2016) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro.2016.94 · Cited by 5,979
Kaplan, J. B., Velliyagounder, K., Ragunath, C., Rohde, H., Mack, D., Knobloch, J. K.-M., & Ramasubbu, N. (2004) · Journal of Bacteriology · doi:10.1128/jb.186.24.8213-8220.2004 · Cited by 301
Host defense and pathogenesis in Staphylococcus aureus infections
DeLeo, F. R., Diep, B. A., & Otto, M. (2009) · Infectious Disease Clinics of North America · doi:10.1016/j.idc.2008.10.003 · Cited by 269
Cited by
Saidi, N., Saderi, H., Owlia, P., & Soleimani, M. (2023) · Advanced Biomedical Research · doi:10.4103/abr.abr_156_21 · Cited by 34
Maione, A., Pietra, A. L., Salvatore, M. M., Guida, M., Galdiero, E., & de Alteriis, E. (2022) · Antibiotics · doi:10.3390/antibiotics11121771 · Cited by 6
Metadata
- Authors
- Suresh, M. K., Biswas, R., & Biswas, L.
- Venue
- International Journal of Medical Microbiology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-01
- Volume
- 309
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-12
- ISSN
- 1438-4221 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2903280404
- Cited by
- 165
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 4.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An update on recent developments in the prevention and treatment of Staphylococcus aureus biofilms. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.ijmm.2018.11.002
- The paper
- Suresh, M. K., Biswas, R., & Biswas, L. (2019). An update on recent developments in the prevention and treatment of Staphylococcus aureus biofilms. International Journal of Medical Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmm.2018.11.002
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.