Cited by 34Bacterial biofilms and quorum sensingProbiotics and Fermented FoodsAntimicrobial Resistance in Staphylococcus

Anti-Biofilm Potential of Lactobacillus casei and Lactobacillus rhamnosus Cell-Free Supernatant Extracts Against Staphylococcus aureus

Open access
Saidi, Navid, Saderi, Horieh, Owlia, Parviz, Soleimani, Mohammad·2023·Advanced Biomedical Research

Abstract

Background: Biofilm production is an important virulence factor in Staphylococcus aureus . Most of the infections associated with biofilms of this bacterium are very difficult to treat using antibiotics. The present research studied the effects of the two probiotic Lactobacillus species L. casei and L. rhamnosus on S. aureus biofilm. Materials and Methods: Cell-free supernatant (CFS) extracts of L. casei ATCC 39392 and L. rhamnosus ATCC 7469 culture were prepared. The effects of sub-minimum inhibitory concentrations of the CFS extracts on cell surface hydrophobicity (CSH), initial attachment, biofilm formation, and their ability in eradicating S. aureus ATCC 33591 biofilms were assessed. In addition, the effects of CFS extracts on expression of the genes involved in formation of S. aureus biofilms ( cidA, hld, sarA, icaA, and icaR ) were also evaluated through real-time polymerase chain reaction. Results: CFSs of both Lactobacillus spp. significantly reduced CSH, initial attachment, and biofilm formation and eradicated the biofilms. The above findings were supported by scanning electron microscopy results. These two Lactobacillus CFSs significantly changed the expression of all studied biofilm-related genes. Expression levels of cidA, hld , and icaR genes significantly increased by 4.4, 2.3, and 4.76 fold, respectively, but sarA and icaA genes were significantly downregulated by 3.12 and 2.3 fold. Conclusion: The results indicated that CFS extracts of L. casei and L. rhamnosus had desirable antagonistic and anti-biofilm effects against S. aureus . Consequently, carrying out further research enables us to prepare pharmaceuticals from these CFSs in order to prevent and treat infections caused by S. aureus biofilms.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4103/abr.abr_156_21

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • By disarming the T3SS apparatus, the probiotic abolishes Salmonella Typhi capacity to inject effector proteins into host enterocytes, halting intracellular invasion.

    “By functionally “disarming” the T3SS apparatus, the probiotic categorically abolishes Salmonella Typhi capacity to inject effector proteins into host enterocytes, effectively halting intracellular invasion66.”

    From Probiotic potential of Lactobacillus acidophilus TMPC 41127 isolated from traditional cheese in inhibiting Salmonella Typhi biofilms and virulence genes (2026) · cites this paper as [66]

    The Results and Conclusion report that Lactobacillus cell-free supernatants reduced Staphylococcus aureus biofilms. Searches for Salmonella Typhi, T3SS, effector injection, and intracellular invasion found no passage addressing the attributed mechanism. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [7]Otto M Romeo T Staphylococcal Biofilms 2008 Bacterial Biofilms Berlin, Heidelberg Springer 207 28
  2. [12]CLSI. Methods for Dilution Antimicrobial Susceptibility Tests for Bacteria That Grow Aerobically; Approved Standard-11th Edition. CLSI DOCUMENTE M07-A11 2018 Wayne, PA Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute
  3. [26]Taylor TM Doores SX Organic acids Antimicrobials in Food 2020 4th ed Boca Raton CRC Press 133 90

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Saidi, N., Saderi, H., Owlia, P., & Soleimani, M.
Affiliations
  • Aja University of Medical Sciences (IR)
  • Shahed University (IR)
Corresponding author
Soleimani, Mohammad
Venue
Advanced Biomedical Research
Published
2023-02
Volume
12
Issue
1
Pages
50-50
ISSN
2277-9175 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4365483760
Cited by
34
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 2
FWCI
3.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-sa
Locations
  • Advanced Biomedical Research (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Shahed University
  • Aja University of Medical Sciences
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bacterial biofilms and quorum sensing
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Probiotics and Fermented Foods
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antimicrobial Resistance in Staphylococcus
Keywords
antibiofilm activity, Staphylococcus aureus biofilm, Lactobacillus casei, Lactobacillus rhamnosus, cell-free supernatant, probiotics, cell surface hydrophobicity, biofilm eradication, biofilm-related gene expression, icaA, ICAR, SARA, CIDA, antibiotic resistance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review