Cited by 98Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationPain Management and Opioid UsePediatric Pain Management Techniques

Coping with chronic pain

Dysvik, Elin, Natvig, Gerd Karin, Eikeland, Ole-Johan, Lindstrøm, Torill Christine·2005·International Journal of Nursing Studies

Abstract

Many models of pain give coping an important role in understanding adaptation to chronic pain. Among these, Lazarus and Folkman's cognitive-phenomenological model of stress and coping provides a theoretical framework to conceptualise stress phenomena and coping strategies related to chronic pain. Chronic pain often necessitates new coping skills. An understanding of the concept of coping and how the patients cope is therefore crucial for the success of rehabilitation. The current study examined how coping, as measured by the Ways of Coping Checklist, was related to medical variables, depression measured by the Short Zung depression rating scale, and Rosenberg's self-esteem scale. The study sample consisted of 88 people who were recruited for a multidisciplinary pain management programme. Data were collected as part of a routine pre-treatment evaluation. Results indicated that the most predominant stressors were related to family life and social activities. We also recognised on the one hand, appraising pain as a challenge was predictive of problem-focused coping, while on the other hand, appraising pain as a threat, experiencing depression, and reduced self-esteem were predictive of emotion-focused coping. Clinical implications of these results in nursing are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2004.06.009

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dysvik, E., Natvig, G. K., Eikeland, O.-J., & Lindstrøm, T. C.
Affiliations
  • University of Stavanger (NO)
  • University of Bergen (NO)
Corresponding author
Dysvik, Elin
Venue
International Journal of Nursing Studies
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2005-03
Volume
42
Issue
3
Pages
297-305
ISSN
0020-7489 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2095588185
Cited by
98
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 7 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 6
FWCI
2.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Nursing Studies (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Opioid Use
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Pediatric Pain Management Techniques
Keywords
chronic pain, coping strategies, stress appraisal, problem-focused coping, emotion-focused coping, depression, self-esteem, multidisciplinary pain management, rehabilitation, family stressors, nursing implications
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Aged, Attitude to Health, Chronic Disease, Depression, Emotions, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Models, Psychological, Norway, Pain, Predictive Value of Tests, Problem Solving, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Surveys and Questionnaires, Regression Analysis, Self Concept, Social Support, Stress, Psychological, Nursing Methodology Research, Multivariate Analysis, Nurse's Role

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review