Cited by 101Cancer survivorship and carePalliative and Oncologic CareArt Therapy and Mental Health

Effects of life review on mental health and well-being among cancer patients: A systematic review

Zhang, Xiaoling, Xiao, Huimin, Chen, Ying·2017·International Journal of Nursing Studies

Abstract

Background Cancer patients often experience psychological distress. Life review has increasingly been used to enhance their mental health and well-being. However, no systematic review has synthesized the evidence, and its effects remain unclear. Objective To examine and synthesize the best available evidence on the effects of life review on mental health and well-being among cancer patients. Design Systematic review of randomized controlled trials and clinical controlled trials. Data sources Twelve electronic databases were searched for published studies reported in English or Chinese, from inception to September 2016. Other supplementary sources, such as related websites, professional books, reference lists, and author contacts were also used for published or unpublished studies. Review methods A comprehensive literature search was conducted to identify eligible randomized controlled trials or clinical controlled trials about the effects of life review on cancer patients. Study selection, quality assessment, and data extraction were independently performed by two reviewers. The results were synthesized without meta-analysis in this review. Results Fifteen studies (899 participants) were identified; of that total, nine studies were rated as strong in quality, while six studies were of moderate quality. In addition to structured life review interviews, other elements such as memory prompts and a legacy product were integrated into life review programs. A majority of studies in…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2017.06.012

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 45 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhang, X., Xiao, H., & Chen, Y.
Affiliations
Fujian Medical University (CN)
Corresponding author
Xiao, Huimin
Venue
International Journal of Nursing Studies
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-09
Volume
74
Pages
138-148
ISSN
0020-7489 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2695545075
Cited by
101
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 59 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2
FWCI
1.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Nursing Studies (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative and Oncologic Care
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Conservation › Art Therapy and Mental Health
Keywords
life review, cancer patients, mental health, well-being, psychological distress, depression, anxiety, hope, self-esteem, quality of life
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Female, Humans, Male, Mental Health, Middle Aged, Neoplasms, Quality of Life

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review