Psychotherapies for depression: a network meta-analysis covering efficacy, acceptability and long-term outcomes of all main treatment types
Open accessAbstract
The effects of psychotherapies for depression have been examined in several hundreds of randomized trials, but no recent network meta‐analysis (NMA) has integrated the results of these studies. We conducted an NMA of trials comparing cognitive behavioural, interpersonal, psychodynamic, problem‐solving, behavioural activation, life‐review and “third wave” therapies and non‐directive supportive counseling with each other and with care‐as‐usual, waiting list and pill placebo control conditions. Response (50% reduction in symptoms) was the primary outcome, but we also assessed remission, standardized mean difference, and acceptability (all‐cause dropout rate). Random‐effects pairwise and network meta‐analyses were conducted on 331 randomized trials with 34,285 patients. All therapies were more efficacious than care‐as‐usual and waiting list control conditions, and all therapies – except non‐directive supportive counseling and psychodynamic therapy – were more efficacious than pill placebo. Standardized mean differences compared with care‐as‐usual ranged from –0.81 for life‐review therapy to –0.32 for non‐directive supportive counseling. Individual psychotherapies did not differ significantly from each other, with the only exception of non‐directive supportive counseling, which was less efficacious than all other therapies. The results were similar when only studies with low risk of bias were included. Most therapies still had significant effects at 12‐month follow‐up compared to care‐as‐usual, and problem‐solving therapy was found to have a somewhat higher long‐term efficacy than some other therapies. No consistent differences in acceptability were found. Our conclusion is that the most important types of psychotherapy are efficacious and acceptable in the acute treatment of adult depression, with few significant differences between them. Patient preference and availability of each treatment type may play a larger role in the choice between types of psychotherapy, although it is possible that a more detailed characterization of patients with a diagnosis of depression may lead to a more precise matching between individual patients and individual psychotherapies.
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
This network meta-analysis of 331 randomized trials (34,285 patients) found that all main psychotherapies for adult depression were more efficacious than care-as-usual and waiting list, with few significant differences between therapies. Non-directive supportive counseling was the main exception, being less efficacious than other therapies, while acceptability differences were not consistent.
Key findings
- Across 331 trials and 34,285 patients, all therapies were more efficacious than care-as-usual and waiting list; all except non-directive supportive counseling and psychodynamic therapy were more efficacious than pill placebo.
- Standardized mean differences versus care-as-usual ranged from −0.81 for life-review therapy to −0.32 for non-directive supportive counseling. Individual psychotherapies did not differ significantly from each other, except non-directive supportive counseling was less efficacious than all other therapies (response ORs 0.49–0.65).
- At 12 (±6) months, among 90 studies, CBT, behavioural activation, problem-solving, interpersonal, and psychodynamic therapy had significant effects versus care-as-usual; problem-solving therapy was significantly more effective than CBT, “third wave” therapies, and non-directive supportive counseling at follow-up.
- No consistent acceptability differences were found between therapies. The paper reports that acceptability of all therapies except interpersonal psychotherapy and life-review therapy was significantly lower than waiting list (ORs 0.49–0.67), and psychodynamic therapy was significantly less acceptable than care-as-usual (OR=0.64).
Methods
- Network meta-analysis of randomized trials comparing eight major psychotherapy types (CBT, behavioural activation, problem-solving, “third wave,” interpersonal, psychodynamic, non-directive supportive counseling, life-review) with each other and with waiting list, care-as-usual, or pill placebo. Searches covered 1966 to January 1, 2020; 24,647 abstracts were examined, 2,914 full texts retrieved, and 331 trials included.
- Primary outcome was treatment response (≥50% reduction in depressive symptoms); also assessed remission, standardized mean difference, and acceptability (all-cause dropout). Random-effects pairwise and network meta-analyses were conducted, with SUCRA rankings, inconsistency tests, sensitivity analyses (low risk of bias, excluding life-review, excluding pill placebo), meta-regression, and GRADE/CINeMA certainty ratings.
- Risk of bias was assessed with four Cochrane criteria; 102 studies (30.8%) had low overall risk of bias, 148 (44.7%) moderate, and 81 (24.4%) high.
Limitations
- The paper states that the proportion of low-risk-of-bias studies was still relatively small (30.8%), that direct and indirect evidence showed discrepancies until 37 influential outliers were excluded, and that relatively few trials reported longer-term outcomes, making those effects uncertain.
- The paper also notes that pill placebo comparisons were based on a small number of studies (10 studies; 3.0%) and that life-review therapy is mostly used in older adults, which may violate the transitivity assumption; pill placebo studies could also include antidepressant randomization, another possible transitivity concern.
- Evident from the text: most evidence focused on CBT (211 trials; 63.7%), care-as-usual, and waiting list, while some therapies and comparisons had few trials, limiting precision for those nodes.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
0 of 10 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
- Findingown data§ Psychotherapies for depression: a network meta-analysis covering efficacy, acceptability and long-term outcomes of all main treatment types
No consistent differences in acceptability were found.
“No consistent differences in acceptability were found.”
- Also stated in: § Network meta-analyses · plain
“No significant differences for acceptability were found between any of the therapies.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The network meta-analysis assumes transitivity, meaning that studies comparing different treatments are similar enough to combine direct and indirect evidence.
- Also stated in: § Network meta-analyses · plain
- Findingown data§ Psychotherapies for depression: a network meta-analysis covering efficacy, acceptability and long-term outcomes of all main treatment types
Findings changed little in the analysis restricted to studies at low risk of bias.
“The results were similar when only studies with low risk of bias were included.”
- Also stated in: § Sensitivity and meta-regression analyses · plain
“In the sensitivity analyses in which we only included studies with low risk of bias, we found outcomes comparable to the main analyses.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The network meta-analysis assumes transitivity, meaning that studies comparing different treatments are similar enough to combine direct and indirect evidence.
- Also stated in: § Sensitivity and meta-regression analyses · plain
- Findingown data§ Psychotherapies for depression: a network meta-analysis covering efficacy, acceptability and long-term outcomes of all main treatment types
All therapies except non-directive supportive counseling and psychodynamic therapy were more efficacious than pill placebo.
“all therapies -except non-directive supportive counseling and psychodynamic therapy -were more efficacious than pill placebo.”
- Also stated in: § Network meta-analyses · plain
“All therapies, except non-directive supportive counseling and psychodynamic therapy, were also more efficacious than pill placebo.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The network meta-analysis assumes transitivity, meaning that studies comparing different treatments are similar enough to combine direct and indirect evidence.
- Also stated in: § Network meta-analyses · plain
- Findingown data§ Psychotherapies for depression: a network meta-analysis covering efficacy, acceptability and long-term outcomes of all main treatment types
Problem-solving therapy had somewhat higher long-term efficacy than some other therapies.
“problem-solving therapy was found to have a somewhat higher long-term efficacy than some other therapies.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The network meta-analysis assumes transitivity, meaning that studies comparing different treatments are similar enough to combine direct and indirect evidence.
- Findingown data
Every main psychotherapy category had at least ten trials comparing it with a control condition.
“Each of these major types of psychotherapy was examined in at least ten trials comparing the therapy with a control condition.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- Findingown data§ Psychotherapies for depression: a network meta-analysis covering efficacy, acceptability and long-term outcomes of all main treatment types
In the network meta-analysis, every psychotherapy studied outperformed care-as-usual and waiting list.
“All therapies were more efficacious than care-as-usual and waiting list control conditions”
- Also stated in: § Network meta-analyses · hedged
“The results for response indicate that all therapies are more efficacious than care-as-usual and waiting list, with few significant differences between therapies.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The network meta-analysis assumes transitivity, meaning that studies comparing different treatments are similar enough to combine direct and indirect evidence.
- Also stated in: § Network meta-analyses · hedged
- Findingown data
All therapies except interpersonal psychotherapy and life-review therapy had significantly worse acceptability than waiting list, with odds ratios from 0.49 to 0.67.
“The acceptability of all therapies (except interpersonal psychotherapy and life-review therapy) was significantly lower than waiting list, with ORs ranging between 0.49 to 0.67.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The network meta-analysis assumes transitivity, meaning that studies comparing different treatments are similar enough to combine direct and indirect evidence.
- Findingown data
CBT linked to every other node except life-review therapy.
“CBT was the best examined therapy and was connected to all other nodes (except life-review therapy).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Non-directive supportive counseling was the sole therapy inferior to every other therapy, with odds ratios from 0.49 to 0.65.
“Only non-directive supportive counseling was less efficacious than all other therapies, with ORs ranging between 0.49 to 0.65.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The network meta-analysis assumes transitivity, meaning that studies comparing different treatments are similar enough to combine direct and indirect evidence.
- Findingown data
Psychodynamic therapy was less acceptable than care-as-usual, with an odds ratio of 0.64.
“Psychodynamic therapy was significantly less acceptable than care-asusual (OR=0.64).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The network meta-analysis assumes transitivity, meaning that studies comparing different treatments are similar enough to combine direct and indirect evidence.
- Findingown data
At follow-up, interpersonal psychotherapy outperformed non-directive supportive counseling.
“Interpersonal psychotherapy was also significantly more effective than non-directive supportive counseling at follow-up.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The network meta-analysis assumes transitivity, meaning that studies comparing different treatments are similar enough to combine direct and indirect evidence.
- Findingown data
A design-by-treatment interaction test showed global network inconsistency (p<0.01).
“The design-bytreatment interaction model indicated global inconsistency in the network (p for the null hypothesis of consistency in the network <0.01).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The network meta-analysis assumes transitivity, meaning that studies comparing different treatments are similar enough to combine direct and indirect evidence.
- Findingown data
In the network meta-analysis of 331 trials, all eight examined psychotherapies showed significant beneficial effects relative to care-as-usual and waiting-list control conditions.
“We found that all therapies had significant effects compared to careas-usual and waiting list control condition.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The global tau-squared was 0.19 for response.
“The global tau-squared was 0.19 for response.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The network meta-analysis assumes transitivity, meaning that studies comparing different treatments are similar enough to combine direct and indirect evidence.
- Findingown data
In an NMA of 90 studies with 12±6-month response data, CBT, behavioural activation, problem-solving, interpersonal, and psychodynamic therapies still showed significant benefits versus care-as-usual.
“We conducted an NMA with the 90 studies that reported outcomes for response at 12 (±6) months after randomization (see Table 7).The results indicated that CBT, behavioural activation therapy, problem-solving therapy, interpersonal psychotherapy, and psychodynamic therapy had significant effects compared with care-as-usual at follow-up.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The network meta-analysis assumes transitivity, meaning that studies comparing different treatments are similar enough to combine direct and indirect evidence.
- Findingown data
The therapies did not differ significantly in acceptability.
“No significant differences for acceptability were found between any of the therapies.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The network meta-analysis assumes transitivity, meaning that studies comparing different treatments are similar enough to combine direct and indirect evidence.
- Findingown data
Out of 60 loops, four showed significant inconsistency.
“Considerable inconsistency was found: out of 60 loops, four showed significant inconsistency.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The network meta-analysis assumes transitivity, meaning that studies comparing different treatments are similar enough to combine direct and indirect evidence.
- Findingown data
In meta-regression to assess small study effects, overall results were comparable with main analysis.
“In the meta-regression analysis to assess the influences of small study effects, the overall results were comparable with the main analysis.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The network meta-analysis assumes transitivity, meaning that studies comparing different treatments are similar enough to combine direct and indirect evidence.
- Findingown data
The same therapies, except behavioural activation, also showed significant benefits versus waiting list at follow-up.
“The same therapies, except behavioural activation therapy, had also significant effects compared to waiting list.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The network meta-analysis assumes transitivity, meaning that studies comparing different treatments are similar enough to combine direct and indirect evidence.
- Findingown data
Remission and SMD findings closely resembled the response findings.
“The results for remission and SMD are very similar to those for response.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The network meta-analysis assumes transitivity, meaning that studies comparing different treatments are similar enough to combine direct and indirect evidence.
- Interpretationown data
The authors state this is the largest network meta-analysis of depression psychotherapies to date.
“This is the largest NMA ever conducted in psychotherapies for depression.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Study design and conductown data
Longer-term effects are uncertain because few trials reported such outcomes.
“A final limitation is that only a relatively small number of trials reported longer-term outcomes, which makes these effects uncertain.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationcitation
The authors infer that combined treatment is likely the best option for moderate to severe depression.
“Combined treatments seem therefore to be the best choice for patients with moderate to severe depression.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductown data
The main findings of the network meta-analysis were broadly confirmed across a series of sensitivity analyses.
“These results were broadly confirmed in a series of sensitivity analyses.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
A recent NMA found combined psychotherapy and pharmacotherapy beat either treatment alone for response, including in chronic and treatment-resistant depression.
“In a recent NMA published in this journal 31 , combined psychotherapy and pharmacotherapy was more effective than either of them alone in achieving response, also in chronic and treatment-resistant depression.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [31] source
Not checked in the free run.
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 16
- May combine two claims. 29
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataA diagnostic interview established depressive disorder in 179 studies (54.1%), while 152 studies (45.9%) used a self-rating scale cutoff.
“In 179 studies (54.1%), participants met criteria for a depressive disorder according to a diagnostic interview, while the other studies (152; 45.9%) included participants who scored above a cutoff on a self-rating depression scale.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ Psychotherapies for depression: a network meta-analysis covering efficacy, acceptability and long-term outcomes of all main treatment typesAt 12-month follow-up, CBT, behavioural activation, problem-solving, interpersonal, and psychodynamic therapies still showed significant benefits relative to care-as-usual.
“Most therapies still had significant effects at 12-month follow-up compared to care-as-usual”
- Also stated in: § Long-term effects · hedged
“The results indicated that CBT, behavioural activation therapy, problem-solving therapy, interpersonal psychotherapy, and psychodynamic therapy had significant effects compared with care-as-usual at follow-up.”
- Also stated in: § Long-term effects · plain
“One important finding of this study is that several psychotherapies still have significant effects at one-year follow-up, including CBT, behavioural activation therapy, problem-solving therapy, interpersonal psychotherapy, and psychodynamic therapy.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The network meta-analysis assumes transitivity, meaning that studies comparing different treatments are similar enough to combine direct and indirect evidence.
- Also stated in: § Long-term effects · hedged
May combine two claims.
Findingown data§ Psychotherapies for depression: a network meta-analysis covering efficacy, acceptability and long-term outcomes of all main treatment typesThe standardized mean difference versus care-as-usual was -0.81 for life-review therapy and -0.32 for non-directive supportive counseling.
“Standardized mean differences compared with care-as-usual ranged from -0.81 for life-review therapy to -0.32 for non-directive supportive counseling.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The network meta-analysis assumes transitivity, meaning that studies comparing different treatments are similar enough to combine direct and indirect evidence.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataMost studies aimed at adults in general (145; 43.8%).
“Most studies were aimed at adults in general (145; 43.8%).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ Psychotherapies for depression: a network meta-analysis covering efficacy, acceptability and long-term outcomes of all main treatment typesIndividual psychotherapies did not differ significantly from each other, except non-directive supportive counseling was less efficacious than all other therapies.
“Individual psychotherapies did not differ significantly from each other, with the only exception of non-directive supportive counseling, which was less efficacious than all other therapies.”
- Also stated in: § Network meta-analyses · plain
“Only non-directive supportive counseling was less efficacious than all other therapies, with ORs ranging between 0.49 to 0.65.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The network meta-analysis assumes transitivity, meaning that studies comparing different treatments are similar enough to combine direct and indirect evidence.
- Also stated in: § Network meta-analyses · plain
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe review included 331 randomized trials and 34,285 patients.
“A total of 331 randomized controlled trials (with 34,285 patients) met inclusion criteria.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataSUCRA placed life-review and behavioural activation highest for response and SMD, behavioural activation and problem-solving highest for remission, non-directive supportive counseling and psychodynamic lowest for response, remission and SMD, psychodynamic lowest for acceptability, and life-review and interpersonal highest for acceptability.
“Life-review and behavioural activation therapy ranked highest for response and SMD; behavioural activation and problem-solving therapy ranked highest for remission; while non-directive supportive counseling and psychodynamic therapy ranked lowest for response, remission and SMD.Psychodynamic therapy ranked lowest for acceptability, while life-review and interpersonal psychotherapy ranked highest.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The network meta-analysis assumes transitivity, meaning that studies comparing different treatments are similar enough to combine direct and indirect evidence.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataEvery therapy had links to care-as-usual and waiting list, but none to pill placebo.
“All therapies were connected to care-as-usual and waiting list, but not to pill placebo.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataLow risk of bias was found in 102 studies (30.8%), moderate in 148 (44.7%), and high in 81 (24.4%).
“The risk of bias was low (total score: 4) in 102 studies (30.8%), moderate (total score: 2 or 3) in 148 studies (44.7%), and high (total score: 0 or 1) in 81 studies (24.4%).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataPairwise comparisons found no therapy differences except that non-directive supportive counseling was inferior to CBT, problem-solving therapy, and psychodynamic therapy.
“There were no significant differences between therapies, except that non-directive supportive counseling was less efficacious than CBT, problem-solving therapy, and psychodynamic therapy.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataCBT was examined in 211 trials (63.7%).
“CBT was examined in the majority of studies (211 trials; 63.7%)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataAfter excluding 37 influential outliers, global inconsistency was no longer significant (p=0.11; global tau-squared 0.03), and NMA results were similar to main analyses.
“Through the bootstrap-based evaluation, 37 trials were detected as influential outliers.After excluding these outliers, global inconsistency was no longer significant (p for the null hypothesis of consistency in the network = 0.11; global tau-squared: 0.03).The results of the NMA after excluding these outliers were similar to the main analyses”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The network meta-analysis assumes transitivity, meaning that studies comparing different treatments are similar enough to combine direct and indirect evidence.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataNon-directive supportive counseling was less effective than the other therapies, but this difference lost significance when the analysis was restricted to studies with low risk of bias.
“Non-directive supportive counseling was less effective than the other therapies, but these findings were no longer significant when we only included studies with low risk of bias.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataHeterogeneity was low in most comparisons, but several comparisons had I2 above 50%.
“Although heterogeneity was low in most comparisons, several comparisons (especially involving care-as-usual or non-directive supportive counseling) had an I 2 above 50%.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataBecause only nine studies had outcomes beyond 18 months, no analysis was done for that period.
“Only nine studies reported outcomes at more than 18 months after randomization.Because of the small number of studies and different periods, we did not conduct any analyses with these studies.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn meta-regression, five predictors were statistically significant: diagnosed depressive disorder for CBT vs IPT and CBT vs waiting list; number of sessions for CBT vs BAT; Western vs non-Western countries for CBT vs CAU; and risk of bias for CBT vs BAT.
“In meta-regression analyses, only five predictors were found to be statistically significant (diagnosed depressive disorder for CBT vs. interpersonal psychotherapy, and CBT vs. waiting list; number of sessions for CBT vs. behavioural activation therapy; Western vs. non-Western countries for CBT vs. care-as-usual; and risk of bias for CBT vs. behavioural activation therapy)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The network meta-analysis assumes transitivity, meaning that studies comparing different treatments are similar enough to combine direct and indirect evidence.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe response network was well connected and had no isolated node.
“The network plot for response (Figure 2) indicated a wellconnected network, with no stand-alone node.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataPairwise analyses showed every therapy beat care-as-usual except psychodynamic therapy, and every therapy beat waiting list except non-directive supportive counseling and psychodynamic therapy.
“In pairwise meta-analyses (see Table 2), all therapies were more efficacious than care-as-usual (except psychodynamic therapy) and waiting list (except non-directive supportive counseling and psychodynamic therapy).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn the network meta-analysis, the examined psychotherapies did not differ significantly from one another in efficacy, with the exception that non-directive supportive counseling was less effective than every other therapy.
“The effects of the therapies did not differ significantly from each other, except for non-directive supportive counseling, that was less effective than all the other types of therapy.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn the low-risk-only sensitivity analysis, results matched the main analysis except that non-directive supportive counseling no longer differed significantly from most other therapies and no longer beat care-as-usual or waiting list.
“In the sensitivity analyses in which we only included studies with low risk of bias, we found outcomes comparable to the main analyses.Only the differences between non-directive supportive counseling and most other therapies were no longer significant, and non-directive supportive counseling was no longer significantly better than care-as-usual and waiting list.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The network meta-analysis assumes transitivity, meaning that studies comparing different treatments are similar enough to combine direct and indirect evidence.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataThe study protocol was registered with the Open Science Foundation.
“The protocol for the current NMA has been registered at the Open Science Foundation (https://osf.io/nxvye).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductcitationTransitivity was checked statistically through local and global inconsistency tests.
“The statistical examination of the transitivity assumption was conducted using tests of local and global inconsistency 20 .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [20] source
Not checked in the free run.
- The authors state this as an assumption: The network meta-analysis assumes transitivity, meaning that studies comparing different treatments are similar enough to combine direct and indirect evidence.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataTwo independent researchers assessed risk of bias and resolved disagreements by discussion.
“Assessment of risk of bias was conducted by two independent researchers, and disagreements were solved through discussion.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown data§ Psychotherapies for depression: a network meta-analysis covering efficacy, acceptability and long-term outcomes of all main treatment typesThe main psychotherapy types are effective and acceptable for acute adult depression, and they differ little from one another.
“Our conclusion is that the most important types of psychotherapy are efficacious and acceptable in the acute treatment of adult depression, with few significant differences between them.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The network meta-analysis assumes transitivity, meaning that studies comparing different treatments are similar enough to combine direct and indirect evidence.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningThe analysis treated randomized patients missing from responder analyses as non-responders and kept them in the intention-to-treat set.
“Patients randomized but not included in the analyses of responders in the original reports were assumed to be non-responders and included in the current analyses in order to abide the intention-to-treat principle.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: Randomized patients absent from the original responder analyses are non-responders.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductcitationWhen response rates were missing, they were imputed with a method described as validated.
“When not reported, we imputed response rates using a validated method 16 .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [16]
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataTwo independent researchers screened all records and decided on inclusion, resolving disagreements by discussion.
“All records were screened by two independent researchers, and all papers potentially meeting inclusion criteria according to one of the researchers were retrieved as full text.The decision to include or exclude a study in the database was also done by the two independent researchers, and disagreements were solved through discussion.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductcitationExperts developed definitions for the eight main psychotherapy categories after critically reading and analysing comparative outcome trials.
“The definitions of the eight major types of psychotherapy were developed by experts in the field, based on the critical reading and analysis of therapies described in comparative outcomes trials of psychotherapy for depression 10 .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [10] source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataTwo independent raters classified the psychotherapies, and disagreements were settled by discussion.
“The classification of psychotherapies was made by two independent raters.Any disagreement was resolved through discussion of the two and/or in consultation with the first author.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataSensitivity analyses restricted to low-risk studies, omitted life-review therapy, and omitted pill placebo studies.
“We performed several sensitivity analyses: a) analyses with only studies with low risk of bias; b) analyses excluding life-re-view therapy (this is only used in older adults, and may violate the transitivity assumption); and c) analyses in which studies with pill placebo were excluded (because in these studies patients could also be randomized to antidepressant medication, which may violate the tr”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The network meta-analysis assumes transitivity, meaning that studies comparing different treatments are similar enough to combine direct and indirect evidence.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataGRADE was used to rate certainty for the network estimates of the primary outcome.
“We assessed the certainty of evidence in network estimates of the main outcome in accordance with the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) framework.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationThat NMA also found combined treatment and psychotherapy alone more acceptable than pharmacotherapy.
“Combined treatment and psychotherapy alone were also more acceptable than pharmacotherapy.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [31] source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataDirect and indirect evidence disagreed until outliers were removed, after which they aligned.
“Another important limitation is that we found some discrepancies between direct and indirect evidence, and only after excluding outliers the direct and indirect evidence pointed in the same direction.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe finding that non-directive supportive counseling was less effective than other therapies is consistent with previous meta-analytic work.
“This is in line with previous meta-analytic work 26 .”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [26] source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationLife-review therapy has been used successfully in cancer patients.
“This psychotherapy is mostly used in older adults, but it has also been used successfully in cancer patients 27,28”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataThis network meta-analysis included a considerable number of low-risk-of-bias studies, and the main results were broadly confirmed when these studies were considered.
“However, in contrast to previous meta-analyses, we could include a considerable number of studies with low risk of bias, which broadly confirmed the main results of this NMA.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe findings of this network meta-analysis are consistent with prior meta-analytic research on psychotherapies for depression.
“These findings are in line with previous meta-analytic research on psychotherapies for depression 7,10 .”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataLow risk of bias was relatively uncommon (30.8%), but the number sufficed for sensitivity analyses.
“One important limitation is that the proportion of studies with low risk of bias was still relatively small (30.8%), although this was enough to conduct sensitivity analyses.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataLife-review therapy can be regarded as a promising intervention that is probably efficacious in treating depression.
“However, life-review therapy can be considered a promising intervention that is probably efficacious in depression.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
The authors state this as an assumption.
The network meta-analysis assumes transitivity, meaning that studies comparing different treatments are similar enough to combine direct and indirect evidence.
“The statistical examination of the transitivity assumption was conducted using tests of local and global inconsistency 20 .”
“may violate the transitivity assumption”
The authors state this as an assumption.
Randomized patients absent from the original responder analyses are non-responders.
“Patients randomized but not included in the analyses of responders in the original reports were assumed to be non-responders and included in the current analyses in order to abide the intention-to-treat principle.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Previous meta-analyses omitted life-review therapy due to an insufficient number of studies.
“Life-review therapy was not included in previous metaanalyses, because the number of studies was too small.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Network meta-analyses exist that directly focus on psychotherapy and pharmacotherapy, and these combined for treating depression.
“Network meta-analyses exist that directly focus on psychotherapy7 and pharmacotherapy,25 and these combined for treating depression.6”
From Effect of exercise for depression: systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (2024) · cites this paper as [7]
Cites
Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test
Egger, M., Smith, G. D., Schneider, M., & Minder, C. (1997) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.315.7109.629 · Cited by 56,722 · see citing works
The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials
Higgins, J. P. T., Altman, D. G., Gotzsche, P. C., Juni, P., Moher, D., Oxman, A. D., Savovic, J., Schulz, K. F., Weeks, L., Sterne, J. A. C., et al. (2011) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.d5928 · Cited by 33,817 · see citing works
Vos, T., Abajobir, A. A., Abate, K. H., Abbafati, C., Abbas, K. M., Abd-Allah, F., Abdulkader, R. S., Abdulle, A. M., Abebo, T. A., Abera, S. F., et al. (2017) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(17)32154-2 · Cited by 13,220 · see citing works
Cipriani, A., Furukawa, T. A., Salanti, G., Chaimani, A., Atkinson, L. Z., Ogawa, Y., Leucht, S., Ruhe, H. G., Turner, E. H., Higgins, J. P. T., et al. (2018) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(17)32802-7 · Cited by 3,541 · see citing works
Self-citationThe global prevalence of common mental disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis 1980–2013
Steel, Z., Marnane, C., Iranpour, C., Chey, T., Jackson, J. W., Patel, V., & Silove, D. (2014) · International Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/ije/dyu038 · Cited by 2,846 · see citing works
Graphical tools for network meta-analysis in STATA
Chaimani, A., Higgins, J. P. T., Mavridis, D., Spyridonos, P., & Salanti, G. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0076654 · Cited by 2,473 · see citing works
(2012) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · Cited by 1,951 · see citing works
CINeMA: an approach for assessing confidence in the results of a network meta-analysis
Nikolakopoulou, A., Higgins, J. P. T., Papakonstantinou, T., Chaimani, A., Del Giovane, C., Egger, M., & Salanti, G. (2020) · PLOS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1003082 · Cited by 1,935 · see citing works
Cuijpers, P., Berking, M., Andersson, G., Quigley, L., Kleiboer, A., & Dobson, K. S. (2013) · The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1177/070674371305800702 · Cited by 1,066 · see citing works
Self-citationPsychotherapy for depression in adults: A meta-analysis of comparative outcome studies.
Cuijpers, P., van Straten, A., Andersson, G., & van Oppen, P. (2008) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0013075 · Cited by 1,050 · see citing works
Self-citationTurner, R. M., Davey, J., Clarke, M. J., Thompson, S. G., & Higgins, J. P. (2012) · International Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/ije/dys041 · Cited by 837 · see citing works
Cuijpers, P., Vogelzangs, N., Twisk, J., Kleiboer, A., Li, J., & Penninx, B. W. (2014) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.2013.13030325 · Cited by 677 · see citing works
Self-citationBarth, J., Munder, T., Gerger, H., Nüesch, E., Trelle, S., Znoj, H., Jüni, P., & Cuijpers, P. (2013) · PLoS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1001454 · Cited by 569 · see citing works
Self-citationCuijpers, P., Noma, H., Karyotaki, E., Vinkers, C. H., Cipriani, A., & Furukawa, T. A. (2020) · World Psychiatry · doi:10.1002/wps.20701 · Cited by 540 · see citing works
Self-citationCuijpers, P., Noma, H., Karyotaki, E., Cipriani, A., & Furukawa, T. A. (2019) · JAMA Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2019.0268 · Cited by 539 · see citing works
Self-citationMaj, M., Stein, D. J., Parker, G., Zimmerman, M., Fava, G. A., De Hert, M., Demyttenaere, K., McIntyre, R. S., Widiger, T., & Wittchen, H. (2020) · World Psychiatry · doi:10.1002/wps.20771 · Cited by 435 · see citing works
Rhodes, K. M., Turner, R., & Higgins, J. P. T. (2014) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.08.012 · Cited by 398 · see citing works
The efficacy of non-directive supportive therapy for adult depression: A meta-analysis
Cuijpers, P., Driessen, E., Hollon, S. D., van Oppen, P., Barth, J., & Andersson, G. (2012) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2012.01.003 · Cited by 369 · see citing works
Self-citationImputing response rates from means and standard deviations in meta-analyses
Furukawa, T. A., Cipriani, A., Barbui, C., Brambilla, P., & Watanabe, N. (2005) · International Clinical Psychopharmacology · doi:10.1097/00004850-200501000-00010 · Cited by 337 · see citing works
Self-citationThe effects of fifteen evidence-supported therapies for adult depression: A meta-analytic review
Cuijpers, P., Karyotaki, E., de Wit, L., & Ebert, D. D. (2020) · Psychotherapy Research · doi:10.1080/10503307.2019.1649732 · Cited by 276 · see citing works
Self-citationChaimani, A., Salanti, G., Leucht, S., Geddes, J. R., & Cipriani, A. (2017) · Evidence-Based Mental Health · doi:10.1136/eb-2017-102753 · Cited by 107 · see citing works
Self-citationPsychological treatment of depression in inpatients: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Cuijpers, P. J., Clignet, F., van Meijel, B., van Straten, A., Li, J., & Andersson, G. (2011) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2011.01.002 · Cited by 102 · see citing works
Self-citationEffects of life review on mental health and well-being among cancer patients: A systematic review
Zhang, X., Xiao, H., & Chen, Y. (2017) · International Journal of Nursing Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2017.06.012 · Cited by 101 · see citing works
Perspectives: an international review of the national cost estimates of mental illness, 1990-2003.
Hu, T.-W. (2006) · PubMed · Cited by 97 · see citing works
Cuijpers, P. (2016) · Evidence Based Mental Health · doi:10.1136/eb-2016-102341 · Cited by 86 · see citing works
Self-citationHETEROGI: Stata module to quantify heterogeneity in a meta-analysis
Orsini, N., Bottai, M., Higgins, J. P. T., & Buchan, I. E. (2005) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · Cited by 85 · see citing works
Hutton, B., Wolfe, D. M., Moher, D., & Shamseer, L. (2017) · Evidence-Based Mental Health · doi:10.1136/eb-2017-102666 · Cited by 53 · see citing works
Kleijn, G., Lissenberg-Witte, B. I., Bohlmeijer, E. T., Steunenberg, B., Knipscheer-Kuijpers, K., Willemsen, V., Becker, A., Smit, E. F., Eeltink, C. M., Bruynzeel, A. M. E., et al. (2018) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0197277 · Cited by 52 · see citing works
Self-citationA meta-analytic database of randomised trials on psychotherapies for depressionPreprint
Cuijpers, P. J., Struijs, S. Y., Llamas, J. A., Čihařová, M., Figueroa, C. A., Muñoz, R. F., Karyotaki, E., Quero, S., Pineda, B. S., Vieira, P. M., et al. (2019) · doi:10.17605/osf.io/825c6 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
Self-citationOutlier detection and influence diagnostics in network meta‐analysis
Noma, H., Gosho, M., Ishii, R., Oba, K., & Furukawa, T. A. (2020) · Research Synthesis Methods · doi:10.1002/jrsm.1455 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Self-citationWithdrawal, dependence and adverse events of antidepressants: lessons from patients and data
Tomlinson, A., Boaden, K., & Cipriani, A. (2019) · Evidence-Based Mental Health · doi:10.1136/ebmental-2019-300121 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Self-citationCuijpers, P. J., Noma, H., Karyotaki, E., Cipriani, A., & Furukawa, T. A. (2019) · JAMA Psychiatry · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
1 of the 33 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
McIntyre, R. S., Alsuwaidan, M., Baune, B. T., Berk, M., Demyttenaere, K., Goldberg, J. F., Gorwood, P., Ho, R., Kasper, S., Kennedy, S. H., et al. (2023) · World Psychiatry · doi:10.1002/wps.21120 · Cited by 836 · see citing works
Marx, W., Penninx, B. W. J. H., Solmi, M., Furukawa, T. A., Firth, J., Carvalho, A. F., & Berk, M. (2023) · Nature Reviews Disease Primers · doi:10.1038/s41572-023-00454-1 · Cited by 850 · see citing works
Self-citationNoetel, M., Sanders, T., Gallardo-Gómez, D., Taylor, P., del Pozo Cruz, B., van den Hoek, D., Smith, J. J., Mahoney, J., Spathis, J., Moresi, M., et al. (2024) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj-2023-075847 · Cited by 707 · see citing works
Lam, R. W. M., Kennedy, S. H., Adams, G. C., Bahji, A., Beaulieu, S., Bhat, V., Blier, P., Blumberger, D. M., Brietzke, E. M., Chakrabarty, T., et al. (2024) · The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1177/07067437241245384 · Cited by 408 · see citing works
Cuijpers, P. J., Karyotaki, E., Čihařová, M., Miguel, C., Noma, H., & Furukawa, T. A. (2021) · Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica · doi:10.1111/acps.13335 · Cited by 359 · see citing works
Self-citationCuijpers, P., Miguel, C., Harrer, M., Plessen, C. Y., Ciharova, M., Ebert, D., & Karyotaki, E. (2023) · World Psychiatry · doi:10.1002/wps.21069 · Cited by 354 · see citing works
Self-citationStein, D. J., Shoptaw, S. J., Vigo, D. V., Lund, C., Cuijpers, P., Bantjes, J., Sartorius, N., & Maj, M. (2022) · World Psychiatry · doi:10.1002/wps.20998 · Cited by 331 · see citing works
Self-citationCuijpers, P. J., Miguel, C., Čihařová, M., Harrer, M., Basic, D., Cristea, I. A., de Ponti, N., Driessen, E., Hamblen, J. L., Larsen, S. E., et al. (2024) · World Psychiatry · doi:10.1002/wps.21203 · Cited by 189 · see citing works
Self-citationDiagnosis and management of bipolar disorders
Goes, F. S. (2023) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj-2022-073591 · Cited by 159 · see citing works
Furukawa, T. A., Shinohara, K., Sahker, E., Karyotaki, E., Miguel, C., Ciharova, M., Bockting, C. L. H., Breedvelt, J. J. F., Tajika, A., Imai, H., et al. (2021) · World Psychiatry · doi:10.1002/wps.20906 · Cited by 126 · see citing works
Self-citationPsychological treatment of depression: A systematic overview of a 'Meta-Analytic Research Domain'
Cuijpers, P., Miguel, C., Harrer, M., Plessen, C. Y., Ciharova, M., Papola, D., Ebert, D., & Karyotaki, E. (2023) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2023.05.011 · Cited by 136 · see citing works
Self-citationCiharova, M., Furukawa, T. A., Efthimiou, O., Karyotaki, E., Miguel, C., Noma, H., Cipriani, A., Riper, H., & Cuijpers, P. (2021) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/ccp0000654 · Cited by 124 · see citing works
Self-citationA systematic review of digital and face-to-face cognitive behavioral therapy for depression
Kambeitz-Ilankovic, L., Rzayeva, U., Völkel, L., Wenzel, J., Weiske, J., Jessen, F., Reininghaus, U., Uhlhaas, P. J., Alvarez-Jimenez, M., & Kambeitz, J. (2022) · npj Digital Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41746-022-00677-8 · Cited by 103 · see citing works
Transdiagnostic treatment of depression and anxiety: a meta-analysis
Cuijpers, P., Miguel, C., Ciharova, M., Ebert, D., Harrer, M., & Karyotaki, E. (2023) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s0033291722003841 · Cited by 96 · see citing works
Self-citationIndividual behavioral activation in the treatment of depression: A meta analysis
Cuijpers, P. J., Karyotaki, E., Harrer, M., & Stikkelbroek, Y. A. J. (2023) · Psychotherapy Research · doi:10.1080/10503307.2023.2197630 · Cited by 90 · see citing works
Self-citationBizzozero‐Peroni, B., Martínez‐Vizcaíno, V., Fernández‐Rodríguez, R., Jiménez‐López, E., de Arenas‐Arroyo, S. N., Saz‐Lara, A., Goñi, V. D., & Mesas, A. E. (2023) · Nutrition Reviews · doi:10.1093/nutrit/nuad176 · Cited by 84 · see citing works
Solmi, M., Cortese, S., Vita, G., Prisco, M. D., Raduà, J., Dragioti, E., Köhler‐Forsberg, O., Madsen, N. M., Rohde, C., Eudave, L., et al. (2023) · Molecular Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/s41380-023-02298-3 · Cited by 84 · see citing works
Psychotherapies for Generalized Anxiety Disorder in Adults
Papola, D., Miguel, C., Mazzaglia, M., Franco, P., Tedeschi, F., Romero, S. A., Patel, A., Ostuzzi, G., Gastaldon, C., Karyotaki, E., et al. (2023) · JAMA Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2023.3971 · Cited by 93 · see citing works
Self-citationHeterogeneity of treatment effects in trials on psychotherapy of depression.
Kaiser, T., Volkmann, C., Volkmann, A., Karyotaki, E., Cuijpers, P. J., & Brakemeier, E. (2022) · Clinical Psychology Science and Practice · doi:10.1037/cps0000079 · Cited by 77 · see citing works
Self-citationHoppen, T. H., Jehn, M., Holling, H., Mutz, J., Kip, A., & Morina, N. (2023) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/ccp0000809 · Cited by 65 · see citing works
Buntrock, C., Harrer, M., Sprenger, A. A., Illing, S., Sakata, M., Furukawa, T. A., Ebert, D. D., Cuijpers, P. J., Adriaanse, M. C., Albert, S. M., et al. (2024) · The Lancet Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/s2215-0366(24)00316-x · Cited by 63 · see citing works
Self-citationElyoseph, Z., & Levkovich, I. (2024) · JMIR Mental Health · doi:10.2196/53043 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
Cuijpers, P. J., Miguel, C., Harrer, M., Čihařová, M., & Karyotaki, E. (2024) · Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences · doi:10.1017/s2045796024000611 · Cited by 57 · see citing works
Self-citationCuijpers, P. J., Čihařová, M., Quero, S., Miguel, C., Driessen, E., Harrer, M., Purgato, M., Ebert, D. D., & Karyotaki, E. (2022) · Journal of Personalized Medicine · doi:10.3390/jpm12010093 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
Self-citationHigh depression symptomatology and mental pain characterize suicidal psychiatric patients
Pompili, M., Innamorati, M., Erbuto, D., Luciano, M., Sampogna, G., Abbate-Daga, G., Barlati, S., Carmassi, C., Castellini, G., De Fazio, P., et al. (2022) · European Psychiatry · doi:10.1192/j.eurpsy.2022.2312 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
Chan, J. K. N., Solmi, M., Lo, H. K. Y., Chan, M. W. Y., Choo, L. L. T., Lai, E. T. H., Wong, C. S. M., Correll, C. U., & Chang, W. C. (2025) · World Psychiatry · doi:10.1002/wps.21354 · Cited by 53 · see citing works
Mindfulness programs for problematic usage of the internet: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Fendel, J. C., Vogt, A., Brandtner, A., & Schmidt, S. (2024) · Journal of Behavioral Addictions · doi:10.1556/2006.2024.00024 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
Furukawa, Y., Nagaoka, D., Sato, S., Toyomoto, R., Takashina, H. N., Kobayashi, K., Sakata, M., Nakajima, S., Ito, M., Yamamoto, R., et al. (2024) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2024.09.017 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
Relationship between burnout and Major Depressive Disorder in health professionals: A HEAR report
Zisook, S., Doran, N., Mortali, M. G., Hoffman, L. A., Downs, N. S., Davidson, J. E., Fergerson, B. D., Rubanovich, C. K., Shapiro, D. N., Tai‐Seale, M., et al. (2022) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2022.06.047 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
Indirect prevention and treatment of depression: an emerging paradigm?
Cuijpers, P. (2021) · Clinical Psychology in Europe · doi:10.32872/cpe.6847 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
“Meta-analyses of psychological and pharmacological treatments usually find that the interventions improve outcomes in about 20 to 25% of patients, compared to control conditions (Cipriani et al., 2018; Cuijpers et al., 2021b).”
BackgroundSelf-citationKlein, J. P., Rozental, A., Sürig, S., & Moritz, S. (2024) · Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics · doi:10.1159/000540212 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
The effects of psychological treatment of perinatal depression: an overview
Cuijpers, P. J., & Karyotaki, E. (2021) · Archives of Women s Mental Health · doi:10.1007/s00737-021-01159-8 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Self-citationCuijpers, P. J., Harrer, M., Miguel, C., Čihařová, M., & Karyotaki, E. (2023) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/amp0001250 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
Self-citationBiskupiak, Z., Ha, V. V., Rohaj, A., & Bulaj, G. W. (2024) · Journal of Clinical Medicine · doi:10.3390/jcm13020403 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Bryant, R. A., Bawaneh, A., Awwad, M., Al-Hayek, H., Giardinelli, L., Whitney, C., Jordans, M. J. D., Cuijpers, P., Sijbrandij, M., Ventevogel, P., et al. (2022) · Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences · doi:10.1017/s2045796022000658 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Self-citationFurukawa, T. A., Tajika, A., Toyomoto, R., Sakata, M., Luo, Y., Horikoshi, M., Akechi, T., Kawakami, N., Nakayama, T., Kondo, N., et al. (2025) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-025-03639-1 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Self-citationDepression: why drugs and electricity are not the answer
Read, J., & Moncrieff, J. (2022) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s0033291721005031 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Biological correlates of treatment resistant depression: a review of peripheral biomarkers
Mancuso, E., Sampogna, G., Boiano, A., Rocca, B. D., Vincenzo, M. D., Lapadula, M. V., Martinelli, F., Lucci, F., & Luciano, M. (2023) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1291176 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Čihařová, M., Karyotaki, E., Miguel, C., Walsh, E., de Ponti, N., Amarnath, A., van Ballegooijen, W., Riper, H. M., Arroll, B., & Cuijpers, P. J. (2024) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2024.05.070 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Self-citationYap, S. Y., Ng, F. L., Subramaniam, M., Lim, Y. M., & Foo, C. N. (2022) · Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.3390/bs12110423 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Kopf-Beck, J., Müller, C. L., Tamm, J., Fietz, J., Rek, N., Just, L., Spock, Z. I., Weweck, K., Takano, K., Rein, M., et al. (2024) · Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics · doi:10.1159/000535492 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Bruijniks, S. J. E., Meeter, M., Lemmens, L. H. J. M., Peeters, F. P. M. L., Cuijpers, P. J., & Huibers, M. J. H. (2021) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.brat.2021.104010 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Self-citationScaling up community-delivered mental health support and care: A landscape analysis
Siddiqui, S., Morris, A., Ikeda, D. J., Balsari, S., Blanke, L., Pearsall, M., Rodriguez, R., Saxena, S., Miller, B. F., Patel, V., et al. (2022) · Frontiers in Public Health · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2022.992222 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Tang, N., Sun, C., Wang, Y., Li, X., Liu, J., Chen, Y., Sun, L., Rao, Y., Li, S., Qi, S., et al. (2021) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2021.768819 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Effect of psychotherapy for adult depression on self-esteem: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Bhattacharya, S., Kennedy, M., Miguel, C., Tröger, A., Hofmann, S. G., & Cuijpers, P. J. (2023) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2023.01.047 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Self-citationMavranezouli, I., Megnin‐Viggars, O., Pedder, H., Welton, N. J., Dias, S., Watkins, E. R., Nixon, N. L., Daly, C., Keeney, E., Eadon, H., et al. (2024) · EClinicalMedicine · doi:10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102780 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Solmi, M., Miola, A., Capone, F., Pallottino, S., Højlund, M., Firth, J., Siskind, D. J., Holt, R. I. G., Corbeil, O., Cortese, S., et al. (2024) · Expert Opinion on Drug Safety · doi:10.1080/14740338.2024.2396396 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Cuijpers, P., Miguel, C., Harrer, M., Ciharova, M., & Karyotaki, E. (2024) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2024.05.019 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Self-citationPelosof, R., dos Santos, L. A., Farhat, L. C., Gattaz, W. F., Talib, L. L., & Brunoni, A. R. (2022) · The World Journal of Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1080/15622975.2022.2058083 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Knox, J., Morgan, P. J., KAY‐LAMBKIN, F. J., Wilson, J. W., Wallis, K., Mallise, C. A., Barclay, B., & Young, M. D. (2022) · Current Psychology · doi:10.1007/s12144-022-04017-7 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Zhou, Y., Zhao, D., Zhu, X., Liu, L., Meng, M., Shao, X., Zhu, X., Xiang, J., He, J., Zhao, Y., et al. (2022) · Translational Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/s41398-023-02604-1 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Cuijpers, P. J., Harrer, M., & Furukawa, T. A. (2026) · World Psychiatry · doi:10.1002/wps.70002 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Self-citationCuijpers, P. J., Miguel, C., Čihařová, M., Quero, S., Plessen, C. Y., Ebert, D. D., Harrer, M., van Straten, A., & Karyotaki, E. (2023) · Cognitive Behaviour Therapy · doi:10.1080/16506073.2023.2166578 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Self-citationHusain, N., Lunat, F., Lovell, K., Miah, J., Chew-Graham, C. A., Bee, P., Waqas, A., Pierce, M., Sharma, D., Atif, N., et al. (2024) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(24)01612-x · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Dimensions of skill use in the unified protocol: Exploring unique effects on anxiety and depression.
Southward, M. W., & Sauer-Zavala, S. E. (2021) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/ccp0000701 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Jenewein, J., Moergeli, H., Meyer-Heim, T., Muijres, P., Bopp-Kistler, I., Chochinov, H. M., & Peng‐Keller, S. (2021) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2021.795813 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Cuijpers, P. J., Harrer, M., Miguel, C., Keshen, A. R., Karyotaki, E., & Linardon, J. (2024) · Eating Disorders · doi:10.1080/10640266.2024.2421057 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Self-citationBaier‐Mosch, F., Weiher, G. M., & Kananian, S. (2025) · Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy · doi:10.1007/s10879-025-09664-y · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Tanguay-Sela, M., Rollins, C. P. E., Pérez, T., Qiang, V., Golden, G. M., Tunteng, J.-F., Perlman, K., Simard, J., Benrimoh, D. A., & Margolese, H. C. (2022) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2022.08.041 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Ji, M., Sun, Y., Zhou, J., Li, X., Wei, H., & Wang, Z. (2022) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2022.11.089 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
The therapeutic effects of the therapists’ ability to pass their patients’ tests in psychotherapy
Fimiani, R., Gazzillo, F., Gorman, B. S., Leonardi, J., Biuso, G. S., Rodomonti, M., Mannocchi, C., & Genova, F. (2022) · Psychotherapy Research · doi:10.1080/10503307.2022.2157227 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
The separation distress hypothesis of depression – an update and systematic review
Watt, D. F. (2023) · Neuropsychoanalysis · doi:10.1080/15294145.2023.2240340 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Trends in Outpatient Psychotherapy Among Adults in the US
Olfson, M., McClellan, C. B., Zuvekas, S. H., Wall, M. M., & Blanco, C. (2024) · JAMA Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2024.3903 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Psychological treatment of depression in institutional settings: A meta-analytic review
Cuijpers, P. J., Čihařová, M., Miguel, C., Harrer, M., Ebert, D. D., Brakemeier, E.-L., & Karyotaki, E. (2021) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2021.03.017 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Self-citationTröger, A., Miguel, C., Čihařová, M., de Ponti, N., Durman, G., Cuijpers, P. J., & Karyotaki, E. (2023) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2023.10.047 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Self-citationEfficacy, Safety, and Evaluation Criteria of mHealth Interventions for Depression: Systematic Review
Duarte‐Díaz, A., Perestelo‐Pérez, L., Gelabert, E., Robles, N., Pérez-Navarro, A., Vidal‐Alaball, J., Solà-Morales, O., Sales-Masnou, A., & Carrión, C. (2023) · JMIR Mental Health · doi:10.2196/46877 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Mirjebreili, S. M., Shalbaf, R., & Shalbaf, A. (2024) · Physical and Engineering Sciences in Medicine · doi:10.1007/s13246-024-01392-2 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Schefft, C., Heinitz, C., Guhn, A., Brakemeier, E., Sterzer, P., & Köhler, S. (2023) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1189970 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Li, S., Zhang, J., Li, J., Hu, Y., Zhang, M., & Wang, H. (2025) · Frontiers in Neural Circuits · doi:10.3389/fncir.2025.1516839 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Moggia, D., Bennemann, B., Schwartz, B., Hehlmann, M., Driver, C. C., & Lutz, W. (2023) · Psychotherapy Research · doi:10.1080/10503307.2023.2222892 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Cohen, S. E., Zantvoord, J. B., Wezenberg, B. N., Daams, J. G., Bockting, C., Denys, D. A. J. P., & van Wingen, G. A. (2022) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2022.10.042 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Potsch, L., & Rief, W. (2023) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.brat.2023.104455 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Preventing the Onset of Depressive Disorders: State of the Art and Future Directions
Cuijpers, P. J. (2024) · Current Directions in Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/09637214241297667 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Self-citationThe impact of employment programs on common mental disorders: A systematic review
Evans, L., Lund, C., Massazza, A., Weir, H., & Fuhr, D. C. (2022) · International Journal of Social Psychiatry · doi:10.1177/00207640221104684 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Aemissegger, V., López‐Alcalde, J., Witt, C. M., & Barth, J. (2022) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/36978 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Sherpa, N. N., Giorgi, R. D., Ostinelli, E. G., Choudhury, A., Dolma, T., & Dorjee, S. (2024) · European Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.euroneuro.2024.10.004 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Solomonov, N., Kanellopoulos, D., Grosenick, L., Wilkins, V. M., Goldman, R. L., Ritholtz, S., Falk, A. E., & Gunning, F. M. (2022) · World Psychiatry · doi:10.1002/wps.20946 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Furukawa, T. A., Tajika, A., Sakata, M., Luo, Y., Toyomoto, R., Horikoshi, M., Akechi, T., Kawakami, N., Nakayama, T., Kondo, N., et al. (2023) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2022-067850 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Self-citationHagström, J., Woodford, J., von Essen, A., Lähteenmäki, P. M., & von Essén, L. (2022) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2021-056758 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Angelakis, I., Huggett, C., Gooding, P., Panagioti, M., & Hodkinson, A. (2022) · The British Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1192/bjp.2022.35 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Interpersonal psychotherapy for treatment of obesity: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Toledo, P. R., Neto, F. L., Verdeli, H., Goulart, A. C., Marques, A. H., Solis, A. C. D. O., & Wang, Y. (2022) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2022.09.070 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Hernández‐Rodríguez, J., García‐Muñoz, C., Ortiz‐Álvarez, J., Saigí-Rubió, F., Conejo‐Mir, J., & Rodríguez, J. (2022) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/42397 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Vincenzo, M. D., Sampogna, G., Rocca, B. D., Brandi, C., Mancuso, E., Landolfi, L., Volpicelli, A., Cerbo, A. D., Fiorillo, A., & Luciano, M. (2022) · Annals of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1186/s12991-022-00428-9 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Wang, Y., Yao, J., Koszycki, D., Jiang, W., Fang, F., Wang, M., Tao, J., Zhao, W., Liu, Y., Su, S., et al. (2023) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s0033291723000788 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Individual-Specific Animated Profiles of Mental Health
Zilcha‐Mano, S. (2024) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/17456916231226308 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Olisaeloka, L., Udokanma, E. E., & Ashraf, A. (2024) · International Journal of Mental Health Systems · doi:10.1186/s13033-024-00642-w · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Boschloo, L., Hieronymus, F., Cuijpers, P. J., & ICECA Work Group (2022) · World Psychiatry · doi:10.1002/wps.20944 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Self-citationBeutel, M. E., Krakau, L., Kaufhold, J., Bahrke, U., Grabhorn, A., Hautzinger, M., Fiedler, M., Kallenbach, L., Ernst, M., Rüger, B., et al. (2022) · Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy · doi:10.1002/cpp.2793 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Non-directive supportive therapy for depression: A meta-analytic review
Cuijpers, P. J., Miguel, C., Čihařová, M., Harrer, M., & Karyotaki, E. (2024) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2024.01.073 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Self-citationAssessment of suicidality in trials of psychological interventions for depression: a meta-analysis
Miguel, C., Cecconi, J., Harrer, M., van Ballegooijen, W., Bhattacharya, S., Karyotaki, E., Cuijpers, P. J., Gentili, C., & Cristea, I. A. (2024) · The Lancet Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/s2215-0366(24)00027-0 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Self-citationMalhi, G. S., Bell, E., Stavdal, A., Wu, C., Naylor, A., & Kumari, V. (2026) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(26)00201-1 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Toyomoto, R., Sakata, M., Yoshida, K., Luo, Y., Nakagami, Y., Uwatoko, T., Shimamoto, T., Sahker, E., Tajika, A., Suga, H., et al. (2022) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2022.11.024 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Self-citationSolomonov, N. (2023) · Psychiatry Research · doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2023.115469 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Positioning rTMS Within a Sequential Treatment Algorithm of Depression
Kaster, T. S., & Blumberger, D. M. (2024) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.20240604 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Cuijpers, P. J., Harrer, M., Miguel, C., Karyotaki, E., & Papola, D. (2026) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2025.121106 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Self-citationMårtensson, E., Coumoundouros, C., Sörensdotter, R., von Essén, L., & Woodford, J. (2022) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2022.09.093 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
A critical assessment of NICE guidelines for treatment of depression
Leichsenring, F., Steinert, C., Rost, F., Abbass, A. A., Heim, N., & Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2023) · World Psychiatry · doi:10.1002/wps.21039 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Characteristics of effective teletherapy for major depression: A systematic review
Crowe, M., Inder, M., Manuel, J., & Carlyle, D. (2023) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2023.02.019 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Wienicke, F. J., Beutel, M. E., Zwerenz, R., Brähler, E., Fonagy, P., Luyten, P., Constantinou, M., Barber, J. P., McCarthy, K. S., Solomonov, N., et al. (2023) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2023.102269 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Self-citationDuffy, K. E. M., Simmonds‐Buckley, M., Haake, R., Delgadillo, J., & Barkham, M. (2023) · Psychotherapy Research · doi:10.1080/10503307.2023.2227757 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
- Authors
- Cuijpers, P., Quero, S., Noma, H., Ciharova, M., Miguel, C., Karyotaki, E., Cipriani, A., Cristea, I. A., & Furukawa, T. A.
- Affiliations
- Amsterdam Public Health (NL)
- Universitat Jaume I (ES)
- The Institute of Statistical Mathematics (JP)
- Department of Clinical, Neuro and Developmental Psychology, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam Amsterdam The Netherlands
- Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
- University of Pavia (IT)
- Kyoto University (JP)
- ORCID
- Venue
- World Psychiatry
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2021-05-18
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 283-293
- ISSN
- 1723-8617 (ISSN-L)
- 2051-5545
- PMC
- PMC8129869
- OpenAlex
- W3112767874
- Semantic Scholar
- 7e19034e6fce88ccb2ea46b92848240ec126f3ab
- Cited by
- 388
- References
- 33
- Citations by year
- 2026: 87 · 2025: 79 · 2024: 92 · 2023: 66 · 2022: 49 · 2021: 15
- FWCI
- 37.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- World Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- VU Research Portal (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Padua Research Archive (University of Padova) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- National Institute for Health and Care Research (RP-2017-08-ST2-006)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
- Keywords
- depression, psychotherapy, cognitive behavioral therapy, interpersonal psychotherapy, psychodynamic psychotherapy, problem-solving therapy, behavioral activation, life review therapy, third-wave therapies, treatment efficacy, treatment acceptability, long-term outcomes, remission, placebo response
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-09.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-09.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review