Cited by 34Dental Implant Techniques and OutcomesOral health in cancer treatmentDental Health and Care Utilization

Oral health-related quality of life in tumour patients treated with patient-specific dental implants

Jehn, P., Spalthoff, S., Korn, P., Stoetzer, M., Gercken, M., Gellrich, N.-C., Rahlf, B.·2020·International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery

Abstract

Dental rehabilitation after surgically acquired bone deficiency related to tumour treatment remains a challenge. The insertion of patient-specific implants geared to the contour of the remaining bone is a feasible method of supporting fixed or removable dentures. As oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) is of great interest in these cases, 12 individuals treated with patient-specific implants for severe bone deficiency were surveyed and their Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP) scores after dental rehabilitation were evaluated. The OHIP-G53 questionnaire was used to measure overall treatment outcomes. The distribution of OHIP sum-scores for participants treated with patient-specific implants was almost homogeneous when compared to those cited in the literature for patients treated with conventional dental implants. OHIP items related to functional impairment and physical pain showed the highest scores (occurring occasionally), and financial loss related to treatment was frequently stated. Moreover, higher scores were detected in almost all OHIP dimensions for participants with patient-specific implant-supported removable dentures. Conversely, those treated with patient-specific dental implants and fixed dentures showed lower psychosocial impact scores and equal or superior OHRQoL. Hence, patient-specific dental implants, especially combined with fixed dentures, can lead to a positive OHRQoL in patients with severe bone deficiencies related to tumour therapy.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijom.2020.01.011

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 31 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jehn, P., Spalthoff, S., Korn, P., Stoetzer, M., Gercken, M., Gellrich, N.-C., & Rahlf, B.
Affiliations
Medizinische Hochschule Hannover (DE)
Corresponding author
Jehn, P.
Venue
International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-08
Volume
49
Issue
8
Pages
1067-1072
ISSN
0901-5027 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3001114026
Cited by
33
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 3
FWCI
4.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Oral Surgery › Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Oral health in cancer treatment
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Periodontics › Dental Health and Care Utilization
Keywords
oral health-related quality of life, dental rehabilitation, fixed dentures, removable dentures, Oral Health Impact Profile, implant-supported dentures, cancer treatment side effects
MeSH terms
Denture, Complete, Humans, Neoplasms, Oral Health, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, Dental Implants

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review