Cited by 481Big Data and Business IntelligenceDigital Marketing and Social MediaSupply Chain Resilience and Risk Management

Insights from hashtag #supplychain and Twitter Analytics: Considering Twitter and Twitter data for supply chain practice and research

Chae, Bongsug (Kevin)·2015·International Journal of Production Economics

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijpe.2014.12.037

Cites

82 of 82 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chae, B. (.
Affiliations
Kansas State University (US)
Corresponding author
Chae, Bongsug (Kevin)
Venue
International Journal of Production Economics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-07
Volume
165
Pages
247-259
ISSN
0925-5273 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1986428794
Cited by
481
References
82
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 39 · 2024: 32 · 2023: 53 · 2022: 51 · 2021: 61 · 2020: 54 · 2019: 45 · 2018: 54 · 2017: 48 · 2016: 25 · 2015: 5
FWCI
89.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Production Economics (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Big Data and Business Intelligence
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Digital Marketing and Social Media
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Supply Chain Resilience and Risk Management
Keywords
Twitter, supply chain management, social media analytics, descriptive analytics, content analytics, network analysis, sentiment analysis, text mining, stakeholder engagement, supply chain risk management, information sharing, professional networking, big data

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review