CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 277Quality and Supply ManagementSustainable Supply Chain ManagementManagement and Optimization Techniques

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 51 of the 67 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The effect of lean methods and tools on the environmental performance of manufacturing organisations

Open access
Garza-Reyes, Jose Arturo, Kumar, Vikas, Chaikittisilp, Sariya, Tan, Kim Hua·2018·International Journal of Production Economics
DOI 10.1016/j.ijpe.2018.03.030
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijpe.2018.03.030

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 67 references

16 of the 67 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Cusumano, 1994, The limits of lean, Sloan Manag. Rev., 35, 27
  2. Franchetti, 2009, Lean and green: industrial engineering methods are natural stepping stones to green Engineering, Ind. Eng., 41, 24
  3. Kumar, 2010, JIT Based quality management: concepts and implications in indian context, Int. J. Eng. Sci. Technol., 2, 40
  4. Saunders, 2012
  5. Simons, 2003, Lean and green: doing more with less, Int. Commer. Rev. ECR J., 3, 84
  6. Torielli, 2011, Using lean methodologies for economically and environmentally sustainable foundries, China Foundry, 8, 74

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–246 of 246

Metadata

Authors
Garza-Reyes, J. A., Kumar, V., Chaikittisilp, S., & Tan, K. H.
Affiliations
  • University of Warwick (GB)
  • University of Nottingham (GB)
ORCID
Tan, Kim Hua
Venue
International Journal of Production Economics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-06
Volume
200
Pages
170-180
ISSN
0925-5273 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.ijpe.2018.03.030
OpenAlex
W2795108937
Cited by
277
References
67
Citations by year
2026: 27 · 2025: 35 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 45 · 2022: 39 · 2021: 47 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 8
FWCI
38.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • International Journal of Production Economics (publishedVersion)
  • UWE Research Repository (UWE Bristol) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • University of Derby Online Research Archive. (University of Derby) (submittedVersion)
  • Nottingham ePrints (University of Nottingham) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Repository@Nottingham (University of Nottingham) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Quality and Supply Management
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Sustainable Supply Chain Management
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Management and Optimization Techniques
Keywords
lean manufacturing, environmental performance, just-in-time, Kaizen, continuous improvement, total productive maintenance, value stream mapping, material utilization, energy consumption, pollutant release, manufacturing organisations

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review