Cited by 136Advanced Drug Delivery SystemsNanoparticle-Based Drug DeliveryDrug Solubulity and Delivery Systems

Is dialysis a reliable method for studying drug release from nanoparticulate systems?—A case study

Zambito, Y., Pedreschi, E., Di Colo, G.·2012·International Journal of Pharmaceutics

Abstract

The kinetics of in vitro drug release from nanoparticulate systems is extensive, though uncritically, being studied by dialysis. Evaluating the actual relevance of dialysis data to drug release was the purpose of this study. Diclofenac- or ofloxacin-loaded chitosan nanoparticles crosslinked with tripolyphosphate were prepared and characterized. With each drug, dynamic dialysis was applied to nanoparticle dispersion, solution containing dissolved chitosan·HCl, and solution of plain drug. Drug kinetics in receiving phase (KRP), nanoparticle matrix (KNM) and nanoparticle dispersion medium (KDM) were determined. Release of each drug from nanoparticles was also assessed by ultracentrifugation. Although KRP data may be interpreted in terms of sustained release from nanoparticles, KNM and KDM data show that, with both drugs, the process was in fact controlled by permeation across dialysis membrane. Analysis of KRP data reveals a reversible interaction of diclofenac with dispersed nanoparticle surface, similar to the interaction of this drug with dissolved chitosan·HCl. No such interactions are noticed with ofloxacin. The results from the ultracentrifugation method agree with the above interpretation of dialysis data. This case study shows that dialysis data from a nanoparticle dispersion is not necessarily descriptive of sustained-release from nanoparticles, hence, if interpreted uncritically, it may be misleading.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2012.05.020

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zambito, Y., Pedreschi, E., & Di Colo, G.
Affiliations
University of Pisa (IT)
Corresponding author
Zambito, Y.
Venue
International Journal of Pharmaceutics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-09
Volume
434
Issue
1-2
Pages
28-34
ISSN
0378-5173 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2037818300
Cited by
136
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 2
FWCI
4.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Pharmaceutics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • CINECA IRIS Institutial research information system (University of Pisa) (submittedVersion)
Funders
University of Pisa
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmaceutical Science › Advanced Drug Delivery Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmaceutical Science › Drug Solubulity and Delivery Systems
Keywords
dialysis, drug release kinetics, chitosan nanoparticles, sodium tripolyphosphate crosslinking, diclofenac, ofloxacin, drug-nanoparticle interaction, sustained drug release, ultracentrifugation, nanoparticle dispersion
MeSH terms
Chemistry, Pharmaceutical, Cross-Linking Reagents, Delayed-Action Preparations, Dialysis, Diclofenac, Drug Carriers, Kinetics, Polyphosphates, Technology, Pharmaceutical, Ultracentrifugation, Reproducibility of Results, Ofloxacin, Chitosan, Nanoparticles

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review