CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 21

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Projects as drivers of sustainability: How the adoption of the reuse principle affects the front-end of a construction project

Rokio, Matias, Ahola, Tuomas, Alkki, Lauri, Ståhle, Matias·2024·International Journal of Project Management
DOI 10.1016/j.ijproman.2024.102647
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

• The study addresses the identified gaps in the project organizing, transition and circular economy (CE) literatures. • The case study is a construction project that aims at detaching and reusing precast concrete elements. • When project applies CE's reuse principle, the project actor collaborate more closely and take broader and different roles in the project front-end. • The application of reuse in construction projects can be viewed in the larger context of sustainability transitions and multi-level perspective (MLP) should be applied to understand the mechanisms affecting the wider adoption of reuse. • New types of value creation potential as well as barriers to it emerge when reuse principle is applied. Project research has long considered sustainability, but more knowledge is needed about how projects can drive the sustainability transition. In the context of project business, the circular economy (CE) principle of reuse displays considerable potential for reducing resource usage. The front-end of a project is a critical phase as the value potential of the project depends on how project actors commit to its objectives, such as sustainability. In this study, we elaborate on how value creation and actor roles are affected during the front-end of a demonstration project that applies the reuse principle in construction. We show that as a project applies this principle, project actors must assume different roles during the front-end and that new types of values emerge throu…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijproman.2024.102647

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 3 references

Research works printed but not linked: 49

  1. Aarikka-Stenroos, 2022, Companies’ circular business models enabled by supply chain collaborations: An empirical-based framework, synthesis, and research agenda, Industrial Marketing Management, 105, 322, 10.1016/j.indmarman.2022.06.015 · DOI
  2. Aarseth, 2017, Project sustainability strategies: A systematic literature review, International Journal of Project Management, 35, 1071, 10.1016/j.ijproman.2016.11.006 · DOI
  3. Alimadadi, 2022, A pragmatist perspective on front-end project organizing: The case of refurbishment of the Palace of Westminster, International Journal of Project Management, 40, 763, 10.1016/j.ijproman.2022.08.008 · DOI
  4. Artto, 2016, From the front end of projects to the back end of operations: Managing projects for value creation throughout the system lifecycle, International Journal of Project Management, 34, 258, 10.1016/j.ijproman.2015.05.003 · DOI
  5. Austin, 2012, Collaborative value creation: A review of partnering between nonprofits and businesses: Part I. Value creation spectrum and collaboration stages, Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 41, 726, 10.1177/0899764012450777 · DOI
  6. Bandeira Barros, 2023, Towards a more sustainable construction industry: Bridging the gap between technical progress and commercialization of self-healing concrete, Construction and Building Materials, 403, 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.133094 · DOI
  7. Bocken, 2018, Experimenting with a circular business model: Lessons from eight cases, Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 28, 79, 10.1016/j.eist.2018.02.001 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Bolger, 2019, Circular cities: Exploring local government strategies to facilitate a circular economy, European Planning Studies, 27, 2184, 10.1080/09654313.2019.1642854 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Bressanelli, 2019, Challenges in supply chain redesign for the circular economy: A literature review and a multiple case study, International Journal of Production Research, 57, 7395, 10.1080/00207543.2018.1542176 · DOI
  10. Chan, 2022, Selection of low-carbon building materials in construction projects: construction professionals’ perspectives, Buildings, 12, 10.3390/buildings12040486 · DOI
  11. Christensen, 2021, Towards a circular economy in cities: Exploring local modes of governance in the transition towards a circular economy in construction and textile recycling, Journal of Cleaner Production, 305, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127058 · DOI
  12. Daniel, 2022, Multi-level perspective framework in macro project studies: Towards a complex project organizing approach to sustainability transitions, International Journal of Project Management, 40, 865, 10.1016/j.ijproman.2022.10.001 · DOI
  13. De Wolf, 2020, Comparison of environmental assessment methods when reusing building components: A case study, Sustainable Cities and Society, 61, 10.1016/j.scs.2020.102322 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Elo, 2014, Qualitative content analysis, SAGE Open, 4, 10.1177/2158244014522633 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Ghaffar, 2020, Pathways to circular construction: An integrated management of construction and demolition waste for resource recovery, Journal of Cleaner Production, 244, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118710 · DOI
  16. Ghisellini, 2016, A review on circular economy: The expected transition to a balanced interplay of environmental and economic systems, Journal of Cleaner Production, 114, 11, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.007 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Hagbert, 2019, Actors in transition: Shifting roles in Swedish sustainable housing development, Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 34, 697, 10.1007/s10901-019-09695-7 · DOI
  18. Hansen, 2020, Circular value creation architectures: Make, ally, buy, or laissez-faire, Journal of Industrial Ecology, 24, 1250, 10.1111/jiec.13016 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Harala, 2023, Industrial ecosystem renewal towards circularity to achieve the benefits of reuse - Learning from circular construction, Journal of Cleaner Production, 389, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.135885 · DOI
  20. Huemann, 2017, Projects to create the future: Managing projects meets sustainable development, International Journal of Project Management, 35, 1066, 10.1016/j.ijproman.2017.04.014 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Huuhka, 2015, Reusing concrete panels from buildings for building: Potential in Finnish 1970s mass housing, Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 101, 105, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.05.017 · DOI · Paper page
  22. Keeys, 2017, Project benefits co-creation: Shaping sustainable development benefits, International Journal of Project Management, 35, 1196, 10.1016/j.ijproman.2017.02.008 · DOI · Paper page
  23. Kirchherr, 2017, Conceptualizing the circular economy: An analysis of 114 definitions, Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 127, 221, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.09.005 · DOI · Paper page
  24. Kivilä, 2017, Sustainable project management through project control in infrastructure projects, International Journal of Project Management, 35, 1167, 10.1016/j.ijproman.2017.02.009 · DOI · Paper page
  25. Kroh, 2023, In favor or against: The influence of skeptical stakeholders in urban innovation projects for green transformation, International Journal of Project Management, 41, 10.1016/j.ijproman.2023.102515 · DOI
  26. Le Pennec, 2018, Value creation in inter-organizational collaboration: An empirical study, Journal of Business Ethics, 148, 817, 10.1007/s10551-015-3012-7 · DOI
  27. Lehtimäki, 2023, Project-based practices for promoting a sustainability transition in a city organization and its urban context, International Journal of Project Management, 41
  28. Liu, 2019, The co-creation of values-in-use at the front end of infrastructure development programs, International Journal of Project Management, 37, 684, 10.1016/j.ijproman.2019.01.013 · DOI
  29. Lüdeke-Freund, 2019, A review and typology of circular economy business model patterns, Journal of Industrial Ecology, 23, 36, 10.1111/jiec.12763 · DOI · Paper page
  30. Nigra, 2023, Cooperative learning in green building demonstration projects: Insights from 30 innovative and environmentally sustainable demonstrations around the world, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 149, 10.1061/JCEMD4.COENG-12881 · DOI
  31. Matinheikki, 2016, Managing inter-organizational networks for value creation in the front-end of projects, International Journal of Project Management, 34, 1226, 10.1016/j.ijproman.2016.06.003 · DOI
  32. Martinsuo, 2018, Lifecycle-oriented framing of value at the front end of infrastructure projects, International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 12, 617, 10.1108/IJMPB-09-2018-0172 · DOI
  33. Martens, 2017, Key factors of sustainability in project management context: A survey exploring the project managers’ perspective, International Journal of Project Management, 35, 1084, 10.1016/j.ijproman.2016.04.004 · DOI
  34. Ranta, 2018, Creating value in the circular economy: A structured multiple-case analysis of business models, Journal of Cleaner Production, 201, 988, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.08.072 · DOI
  35. Riuttala, 2024, How building component reuse creates economic value – Identifying value capture determinants from a case study, Journal of Cleaner Production, 443, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.141112 · DOI
  36. Sabini, 2019, 25 years of ‘sustainable projects’. What we know and what the literature says, International Journal of Project Management, 37, 820, 10.1016/j.ijproman.2019.05.002 · DOI
  37. Salama, 2017, Design of concrete buildings for disassembly: An explorative review, International Journal of Sustainable Built Environment, 6, 617, 10.1016/j.ijsbe.2017.03.005 · DOI · Paper page
  38. Silvius, 2017, Sustainability as a new school of thought in project management, Journal of Cleaner Production, 166, 1479, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.08.121 · DOI · Paper page
  39. Silvius, 2014, Sustainability in project management: A literature review and impact analysis, Social Business, 4, 63, 10.1362/204440814X13948909253866 · DOI
  40. Santos, 2024, Prioritizing stakeholders in collaborative research and innovation projects toward sustainability, Project Management Journal, 10.1177/87569728241231266 · DOI
  41. Többen, 2022, Developing a framework to integrate circularity into construction projects, Sustainability (Switzerland), 14
  42. Williams, 2010, Issues in front end decision making on projects, Project Management Journal, 41, 38, 10.1002/pmj.20160 · DOI
  43. Williams, 2019, The front-end of projects: A systematic literature review and structuring, Production Planning and Control, 30, 1137, 10.1080/09537287.2019.1594429 · DOI · Paper page
  44. Winch, 2016, Owner project capabilities for infrastructure development: A review and development of the “strong owner” concept, International Journal of Project Management, 34, 271, 10.1016/j.ijproman.2015.02.002 · DOI
  45. Winch, 2023, Projecting for sustainability transitions, International Journal of Project Management, 41, 10.1016/j.ijproman.2023.102456 · DOI
  46. Yang, 2015, Effect of supplementary cementitious materials on reduction of CO2 emissions from concrete, Journal of Cleaner Production, 103, 774, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.03.018 · DOI
  47. Zerjav, 2021, Why do business organizations participate in projects? Toward a typology of project value domains, Project Management Journal, 52, 287, 10.1177/87569728211001663 · DOI
  48. Zerjav, 2021, The multiplicity of value in the front-end of projects: The case of London transportation infrastructure, International Journal of Project Management, 39, 507, 10.1016/j.ijproman.2021.03.004 · DOI
  49. Zhang, 2022, An overview of the waste hierarchy framework for analyzing the circularity in construction and demolition waste management in Europe, Science of the Total Environment, 803, 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.149892 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 21

Metadata

Authors
Rokio, M., Ahola, T., Alkki, L., & Ståhle, M.
Venue
International Journal of Project Management
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2024-10
Volume
42
Issue
7
Pages
102647
ISSN
0263-7863
DOI
10.1016/j.ijproman.2024.102647
Cited by
21
References
3
Language
en
Licence
Funders
  • Horizon 2020
  • European Union's Research and Innovation (ID 958200)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review