CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 55

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Projects as interventions

Whyte, Jennifer, Mottee, Lara·2022·International Journal of Project Management
DOI 10.1016/j.ijproman.2022.10.007
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijproman.2022.10.007

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 56

  1. Ahmed, 2022, Benchmarking sustainability of megaprojects: A review, Sustainable Energy Development and Innovation, 743, 10.1007/978-3-030-76221-6_82 · DOI
  2. Armenia, 2019, Sustainable project management: A conceptualization-oriented review and a framework proposal for future studies, Sustainability, 11, 2664, 10.3390/su11092664 · DOI
  3. Artto, 2016, From the front end of projects to the back end of operations: Managing projects for value creation throughout the system lifecycle, International Journal of Project Management, 34, 258, 10.1016/j.ijproman.2015.05.003 · DOI
  4. Barua, 2021, Infrastructure and non-human life: A wider ontology, Progress in Human Geography, 45, 1467, 10.1177/0309132521991220 · DOI
  5. Boyd, 2018, Unintended consequences: Institutional artefacts, closure mechanisms and the performance gap, Building Research & Information, 46, 10, 10.1080/09613218.2017.1331096 · DOI
  6. Brand, 2009, Critical natural capital revisited: ecological resilience and sustainable development, Ecological Economics, 68, 605, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.09.013 · DOI
  7. Braun, 2004, Nature and culture: On the career of a false problem, A Companion to Cultural Geography, 151, 10.1002/9780470996515.ch11 · DOI
  8. Braun, 2005, Environmental issues: Writing a more-than-human urban geography, Progress in Human Geography, 29, 635, 10.1191/0309132505ph574pr · DOI
  9. Brooks, 2016, Sustainable construction and socio-technical transitions in London's Mega-Projects, The Geographical Journal, 182, 395, 10.1111/geoj.12167 · DOI
  10. Buyle, 2013, Life cycle assessment in the construction sector: A review, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 26, 379, 10.1016/j.rser.2013.05.001 · DOI
  11. Cicmil, 2006, New possibilities for project management theory: A critical engagement, Project Management Journal, 37, 111, 10.1177/875697280603700311 · DOI
  12. Comi, 2018, Future making and visual artefacts: An ethnographic study of a design project, Organization Studies, 39, 1055, 10.1177/0170840617717094 · DOI
  13. Davies, 2021, The European Union roadmap for implementing nature-based solutions: A review, Environmental Science & Policy, 121, 49, 10.1016/j.envsci.2021.03.018 · DOI
  14. Dewey, 1924, Logical method and law, Cornell Law Review, 10, 17
  15. Engwall, 2003, No project is an island: Linking projects to history and context, Research Policy, 32, 789, 10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00088-4 · DOI
  16. Ferraro, 2015, Tackling grand challenges pragmatically: Robust action revisited, Organization Studies, 36, 363, 10.1177/0170840614563742 · DOI
  17. Gaim, 2022, In praise of paradox persistence: Evidence from the Sydney Opera House Project, Project Management Journal, 10.1177/87569728221094834 · DOI
  18. Gasparro, 2022, Vanguard projects as intermediation spaces in sustainability transitions, Project Management Journal, 53, 196, 10.1177/87569728221077011 · DOI
  19. Gellert, 2003, Mega-projects as displacements, International Social Science Journal, 55, 15, 10.1111/1468-2451.5501002 · DOI
  20. George, 2016, Understanding and tackling societal grand challenges through management research, Academy of Management Journal, 59, 1880, 10.5465/amj.2016.4007 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Gil, 2021, Megaprojects: A meandering journey towards a theory of purpose, value creation and value distribution, Construction Management and Economics, 1
  22. Harjanne, 2019, Abandoning the concept of renewable energy, Energy policy, 127, 330, 10.1016/j.enpol.2018.12.029 · DOI
  23. Hirschman, 1967, The principle of the hiding hand, The Public Interest, 6, 10
  24. Huemann, 2017, Projects to create the future: Managing projects meets sustainable development, International Journal of Project Management, 35, 1066, 10.1016/j.ijproman.2017.04.014 · DOI · Paper page
  25. Jones, 2016, Becoming-urban, becoming-forest: A historical geography of urban forest projects in Australia, Geographical Research, 54, 433, 10.1111/1745-5871.12177 · DOI
  26. Kirsch, 2020, Running out? Rethinking resource depletion, The Extractive Industries and Society, 7, 838, 10.1016/j.exis.2020.06.002 · DOI
  27. Kreiner, 2020, Conflicting notions of a project: The battle between Albert O. Hirschman and Bent Flyvbjerg, Project Management Journal, 51, 400, 10.1177/8756972820930535 · DOI
  28. Legacy, 2017, Infrastructure planning: In a state of panic?, Urban Policy and Research, 35, 61, 10.1080/08111146.2016.1235033 · DOI
  29. Lei, 2017, Using government resettlement projects as a sustainable adaptation strategy for climate change, Sustainability, 9, 1373, 10.3390/su9081373 · DOI
  30. Martens, 2016, Sustainability and success variables in the project management context: An expert panel, Project Management Journal, 47, 24, 10.1177/875697281604700603 · DOI
  31. Martinsuo, 2020, Management of project portfolios: relationships of project portfolios with their contexts, International Journal of Project Management, 38, 441, 10.1016/j.ijproman.2020.02.002 · DOI
  32. Martinsuo, 2014, Value management in project portfolios: Identifying and assessing strategic value, Project Management Journal, 45, 56, 10.1002/pmj.21452 · DOI
  33. Nightingale, 2011, Projects, project capabilities and project organizations, Advances in Strategic Management, 28, 215, 10.1108/S0742-3322(2011)0000028012 · DOI
  34. Ogwang, 2021, Resource-financed infrastructure: Thoughts on four Chinese-financed projects in Uganda, Sustainability, 13, 3259, 10.3390/su13063259 · DOI
  35. Poiani, 2011, Redesigning biodiversity conservation projects for climate change: Examples from the field, Biodiversity and Conservation, 20, 185, 10.1007/s10531-010-9954-2 · DOI
  36. Robichaud, 2011, Greening project management practices for sustainable construction, Journal of Management in Engineering, 27, 48, 10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000030 · DOI
  37. Sabini, 2019, 25 Years of ‘Sustainable projects’. What we know and what the literature says, International Journal of Project Management, 37, 820, 10.1016/j.ijproman.2019.05.002 · DOI
  38. Sankaran, 2020, Creating a ‘Sustainability sublime’ to enable megaprojects to meet the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals, Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 37, 813, 10.1002/sres.2744 · DOI · Paper page
  39. Silvius, 2017, Considering sustainability in project management decision making; an investigation using Q-methodology, International Journal of Project Management, 35, 1133, 10.1016/j.ijproman.2017.01.011 · DOI
  40. Silvius, 2017, Considering sustainability in project management decision making; An investigation using Qmethodology, International Journal of Project Management, 35, 1133, 10.1016/j.ijproman.2017.01.011 · DOI
  41. Silvius, 2020, Exploring variety in factors that stimulate project managers to address sustainability issues, International Journal of Project Management, 38, 353, 10.1016/j.ijproman.2020.08.003 · DOI
  42. Simpson, 2009, Pragmatism, mead and the practice turn, Organization Studies, 30, 1329, 10.1177/0170840609349861 · DOI
  43. Simpson, 2022, The contemporary resonances of classical pragmatism for studying organization and organizing, Organization studies, 43, 127, 10.1177/0170840621991689 · DOI
  44. Steffen, 2015, Planetary boundaries: Guiding human development on a changing planet, Science, 347, 10.1126/science.1259855 · DOI · Paper page
  45. Toljaga-Nikolić, 2020, Project management and sustainability: Playing trick or treat with the planet, Sustainability, 12, 8619, 10.3390/su12208619 · DOI
  46. Tryggestad, 2013, Project temporalities: How frogs can become stakeholders, International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 6, 69, 10.1108/17538371311291035 · DOI
  47. Tutton, 2017, Wicked futures: Meaning, matter and the sociology of the future, The Sociological Review, 65, 478, 10.1111/1467-954X.12443 · DOI
  48. Wenzel, 2021, 36, 845
  49. Wenzel, M., Krämer, H., Koch, J., & Reckwitz, A. (2020). Future and organization studies: On the rediscovery of a problematic temporal category in organizations. Organization Studies. 0170840620912977. · DOI
  50. Whatmore, 2006, Materialist returns: Practising cultural geography in and for a morethan-human world, Cultural Geographies, 13, 600, 10.1191/1474474006cgj377oa · DOI
  51. Whiteman, 2011, Ecological sensemaking, Academy of Management Journal, 54, 889, 10.5465/amj.2008.0843 · DOI
  52. Whyte, 2022, Making futures that matter: Future making, online working and organizing remotely, Organization Theory, 3, 1, 10.1177/26317877211069138 · DOI
  53. Whyte, 2021, Reframing systems integration: A process perspective on projects, Project Management Journal, 52, 237, 10.1177/8756972821992246 · DOI
  54. Whyte, 2020, A research agenda on systems approaches to infrastructure, Civil Engineering and Environmental Systems, 37, 214, 10.1080/10286608.2020.1827396 · DOI
  55. Winch, G.M. (2022). Projecting for sustainability transitions: Advancing the contribution of Peter Morris. Engineering Project Organization Journal, 11. (Special Issue in Memory of Dr. Peter Morris).
  56. zu Ermgassen, 2019, The role of “No net loss” policies in conserving biodiversity threatened by the global infrastructure boom, One Earth, 1, 305, 10.1016/j.oneear.2019.10.019 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Whyte, J., & Mottee, L.
ORCID
Whyte, Jennifer
Venue
International Journal of Project Management
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-11
Volume
40
Issue
8
Pages
934-940
ISSN
0263-7863
DOI
10.1016/j.ijproman.2022.10.007
Cited by
55
References
1
Language
en
Licence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review