Cited by 91Gut microbiota and healthGastrointestinal motility and disordersClostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens research

Microbial Diversity and Composition Is Associated with Patient-Reported Toxicity during Chemoradiation Therapy for Cervical Cancer

Open access
Mitra, Aparna, Grossman Biegert, Greyson Willis, Delgado, Andrea Y., Karpinets, Tatiana V., Solley, Travis N., Mezzari, Melissa P., Yoshida-Court, Kyoko, Petrosino, Joe F. +11 more·2020·International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics

Abstract

Purpose Patients receiving pelvic radiation for cervical cancer experience high rates of acute gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity. The association of changes in the gut microbiome with bowel toxicity from radiation is not well characterized.Methods and materials Thirty-five patients undergoing definitive chemoradiation therapy (CRT) underwent longitudinal sampling (baseline and weeks 1, 3, and 5) of the gut microbiome and prospective assessment of patient-reported GI toxicity. DNA was isolated from stool obtained at rectal examination and analyzed with 16S rRNA sequencing. GI toxicity was assessed with the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite instrument to evaluate frequency, urgency, and discomfort associated with bowel function. Shannon diversity index was used to characterize alpha (within sample) diversity. Weighted UniFrac principle coordinates analysis was used to compare beta (between sample) diversity between samples using permutational multivariate analysis of variance. Linear discriminant analysis effect size highlighted microbial features that best distinguish categorized patient samples.Results Gut microbiome diversity continuously decreased over the course of CRT, with the largest decrease at week 5. Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite bowel function scores also declined over the course of treatment, reflecting increased symptom burden. At all individual time points, higher diversity of the gut microbiome was linearly correlated with better patient-reported GI function, but baseline diversity was not predictive of eventual outcome. Patients with high toxicity demonstrated different compositional changes during CRT in addition to compositional differences in Clostridia species.Conclusions Over time, increased radiation toxicity is associated with decreased gut microbiome diversity. Baseline diversity is not predictive of end-of-treatment bowel toxicity, but composition may identify patients at risk for developing high toxicity.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2019.12.040

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mitra, A., Grossman Biegert, G. W., Delgado, A. Y., Karpinets, T. V., Solley, T. N., Mezzari, M. P., Yoshida-Court, K., Petrosino, J. F., Mikkelson, M. D., Lin, L., Eifel, P., Zhang, J., Ramondetta, L. M., Jhingran, A., Sims, T. T., Schmeler, K., Okhuysen, P., Colbert, L. E., & Klopp, A. H.
Affiliations
  • The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (US)
  • Baylor College of Medicine (US)
Corresponding author
Colbert, Lauren E.
Venue
International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-05
Volume
107
Issue
1
Pages
163-171
ISSN
0360-3016 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3002865023
Cited by
90
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 1
FWCI
3.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Cancer Institute (P30CA016672)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Clostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens research
Keywords
gut microbiota, cervical cancer, chemoradiotherapy, radiation-induced gastrointestinal toxicity, microbiome diversity, patient-reported toxicity, Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite, Clostridia, predictive biomarkers, microbiota composition
MeSH terms
Gastrointestinal Microbiome, Patient Reported Outcome Measures, Adult, Aged, Uterine Cervical Neoplasms, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Safety, Cohort Studies, Gastrointestinal Tract, Biodiversity, Chemoradiotherapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review