The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A meta-analytic assessment of the DeLone and McLean IS success model: An examination of IS success at the individual level
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The DeLone and McLean Model of Information Systems Success: A Ten-Year Update
(2003) · Journal of Management Information Systems · doi:10.1080/07421222.2003.11045748 · Cited by 11,791
Self-citationInformation Systems Success: The Quest for the Dependent Variable
DeLone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. (1992) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.3.1.60 · Cited by 10,697
Self-citationMethods of Meta-Analysis: Correcting Error and Bias in Research Findings
Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (2015) · doi:10.4135/9781483398105 · Cited by 5,542
Value-based Adoption of Mobile Internet: An empirical investigation
Kim, H.-W., Chan, H. C., & Gupta, S. (2007) · Decision Support Systems · doi:10.1016/j.dss.2005.05.009 · Cited by 2,084
Agarwal, R., & Prasad, J. (1997) · Decision Sciences · doi:10.1111/j.1540-5915.1997.tb01322.x · Cited by 1,669
Assessing the Validity of IS Success Models: An Empirical Test and Theoretical Analysis
Rai, A., Lang, S. S., & Welker, R. B. (2002) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.13.1.50.96 · Cited by 1,611
Understanding e-learning continuance intention: An extension of the Technology Acceptance Model
Roca, J. C., Chiu, C.-M., & Martínez, F. J. (2006) · International Journal of Human-Computer Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2006.01.003 · Cited by 1,399
THEORY TESTING: COMBINING PSYCHOMETRIC META‐ANALYSIS AND STRUCTURAL EQUATIONS MODELING
VISWESVARAN, C., & ONES, D. S. (1995) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1995.tb01784.x · Cited by 926
A feedback model to understand information system usage
Bajaj, A., & Nidumolu, S. R. (1998) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/s0378-7206(98)00026-3 · Cited by 266
The use of meta-analysis in MIS research: promises and problems
Hwang, M. I. (1996) · ACM SIGMIS Database: the DATABASE for Advances in Information Systems · doi:10.1145/264417.264433 · Cited by 56
Cited by
Synthesizing information systems knowledge: A typology of literature reviews
Paré, G., Trudel, M.-C., Jaana, M., & Kitsiou, S. (2015) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/j.im.2014.08.008 · Cited by 1,987
Investigating users’ perspectives on e-learning: An integration of TAM and IS success model
Mohammadi, H. (2015) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2014.07.044 · Cited by 779
A Framework and Guidelines for Context-Specific Theorizing in Information Systems Research
Hong, W., Chan, F. K. Y., Thong, J. Y. L., Chasalow, L. C., & Dhillon, G. (2014) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.2013.0501 · Cited by 609
Veeramootoo, N., Nunkoo, R., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2018) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2018.03.004 · Cited by 394
Quality of virtual reality and its impacts on behavioral intention
Lee, M., Lee, S. A., Jeong, M., & Oh, H. (2020) · International Journal of Hospitality Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijhm.2020.102595 · Cited by 320
Metadata
- Authors
- Petter, S., & McLean, E. R.
- Venue
- Information & Management
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2009-04
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 159-166
- ISSN
- 0378-7206 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2019486555
- Cited by
- 701
- References
- 10
- FWCI
- 47.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A meta-analytic assessment of the DeLone and McLean IS success model: An examination of IS success at the individual level. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.im.2008.12.006
- The paper
- Petter, S., & McLean, E. R. (2009). A meta-analytic assessment of the DeLone and McLean IS success model: An examination of IS success at the individual level. Information & Management. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2008.12.006
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
