Cited by 1,611Technology Adoption and User BehaviourInformation Systems Theories and ImplementationInformation Systems Education and Curriculum Development

Assessing the Validity of IS Success Models: An Empirical Test and Theoretical Analysis

Rai, Arun, Lang, Sandra S., Welker, Robert B.·2002·Information Systems Research

Abstract

The purpose of the present study is to empirically and theoretically assess DeLone and McLean's (1992) and Seddon's (1997) models of information systems (IS) success in a quasi-voluntary IS use context. Structural modeling techniques were applied to data collected by questionnaire from 274 system users of an integrated student information system at a midwestern university. The Seddon structural model and the DeLone and McLean structural model each contained five variables (system quality, information quality, perceived usefulness, user satisfaction, and IS use). Both models exhibit reasonable fit with the collected data. The empirical findings are assessed in the broader theoretical context of the IS success literature, including the Technology Acceptance Model and the Theory of Planned Behavior. Our results support DeLone and McLean's focus on integrated IS success models and their observation that IS success models need to be carefully specified in a given context. The Seddon model conceptually elaborates and clarifies aspects of the DeLone and McLean model, thereby effectively integrating core theoretical relationships espoused in the IS success literature. Our study also supports Seddon's three construct categories (system and information quality, general perceptual measures aboutnetbene fts about IS use, and IS behavior), as defining IS success and its impact on nature of IS use.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1287/isre.13.1.50.96

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Long-term use of a system is a key measure of ultimate success.

    “While initial adoption is important, long-term use of a system is a key measure of ultimate success of a system (Rai et al., 2002;DeLone & McLean, 2003).”

    From Technology Acceptance Model 3 and a Research Agenda on Interventions (2008) · cites this paper as Rai et al., 2002

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rai, A., Lang, S. S., & Welker, R. B.
Affiliations
  • Georgia State University (US)
  • McKendree University (US)
  • Southern Illinois University Carbondale (US)
Venue
Information Systems Research
Published
2002-03
Volume
13
Issue
1
Pages
50-69
ISSN
  • 1047-7047 (ISSN-L)
  • 1526-5536
OpenAlex
W2023407407
Cited by
1,611
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 31 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 47 · 2023: 54 · 2022: 60 · 2021: 60 · 2020: 67 · 2019: 76 · 2018: 62 · 2017: 88 · 2016: 71 · 2015: 108 · 2014: 84 · 2013: 108 · 2012: 107
FWCI
76.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Information Systems Research (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Information Systems Theories and Implementation
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information Systems Education and Curriculum Development
Keywords
information system success, DeLone and McLean model, system quality, information quality, perceived usefulness, user satisfaction, technology acceptance model, theory of planned behavior, student information system, university information systems

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review