The DOI matches its Crossref record; 111 of the 121 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 1 of the 50 sources its claims cite were checked for support.
Trust transfer in the continued usage of public e-services
Open accessOverview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
1 of 50 cited sources checked · 1 supported · 0 flagged
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The relationship between interpersonal recommendations and trust in the e-service was nonsignificant”
§ Trust transfer in the continued usage of public e-services > Abstract
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Trust was influenced by e-service quality and recommendations from public administrations and interpersonal sources.”
§ Trust transfer in the continued usage of public e-services > Abstract
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Trust was influenced by e-service quality and recommendations from public administrations and interpersonal sources.”
§ Trust transfer in the continued usage of public e-services > Abstract
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Our results show that trust in the public e-service mediates the influence of both trust in the public administration and trust in the Internet on continuance intentions.”
§ Trust transfer in the continued usage of public e-services > Abstract
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Also in support of H4a-c, our results showed that recommendations made by public administrations influenced formations of trust in public administrations (b = 0.092, p < 0.10), the public e-service (b = 0.123, p < 0.01), and the Internet (b = 0.142, p < 0.05).”
§ Trust transfer in the continued usage of public e-services > 6.1. Hypothesis tests
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Finally, trust in the public e-service significantly related to continuance intentions (b = 0.148, p < 0.01), in support of H6.”
§ Trust transfer in the continued usage of public e-services > 6.1. Hypothesis tests
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“Our proposed model displayed better fit measures than rival model I.The CFI indicator of the rival model (0.917) was lower than the CFI of the proposed model (0.921) and its ratio of x 2 to degrees of freedom was slightly higher (3.565 versus 3.456).In addition, Akaike [3] recommends a model with lower AIC indicators over other models based on the same sample.On this criterion, our proposed model”
§ Trust transfer in the continued usage of public e-services > 6.2.1. Rival model I: no mediation
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [3] 3. H. Akaike, Information theory and an extension of the maximum likelihood principle. Paper presented at the International symposium on information theory, Budapest, Hungary, 1973.
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The AIC was similar but better in our proposed model (AIC = 280.88)compared with rival model II (AIC = 283.01).”
§ Trust transfer in the continued usage of public e-services > 6.2.2. Rival model II: partial mediation
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Also in support of H4a-c, our results showed that recommendations made by public administrations influenced formations of trust in public administrations (b = 0.092, p < 0.10), the public e-service (b = 0.123, p < 0.01), and the Internet (b = 0.142, p < 0.05).”
§ Trust transfer in the continued usage of public e-services > 6.1. Hypothesis tests
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“If we had ignored these controls, the effect of trust in the public e-service would have appeared much greater (b = 0.597, p < 0.001, see Basic model in Table 5).”
§ Trust transfer in the continued usage of public e-services > 6.1. Hypothesis tests
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passes
- Probably not a substantial claim. 23
- It may state two separate claims as one. 19
- The quote only partly states this claim. 3
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“To assess e-service quality, we used the E-S-QUAL scale [76], adapted to mitigate its focus on e-commerce.Thus we employed three items for each of the four dimensions.”
§ Trust transfer in the continued usage of public e-services > 5. Measure validation
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [76] 76. A. Parasuraman, V. Zeithaml, A. Malhotra, ES-QUAL: A multiple-item scale for assessing electronic service quality, J. Service Res. 7 (3), 2005, pp. 213-233. source
The introduction says E-S-QUAL was developed for online shopping sites, and the scale-development passage identifies its four dimensions. The paper’s original scale has 22 items; the citing authors describe the adaptation and selection of three items per dimension as their own methods, not as features of the source scale. (LLM, conf=0.92)
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Supported
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“we found a strong moderating influence of time consciousness”
- Also stated in: § 1. Introduction · plain
“we find that time-conscious users experience a negative impact of interpersonal recommendations, but their effect is positive for people who are less concerned about time as a scarce resource.”
§ Trust transfer in the continued usage of public e-services > Abstract
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Also stated in: § 1. Introduction · plain
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Trust was influenced by e-service quality and recommendations from public administrations and interpersonal sources.”
§ Trust transfer in the continued usage of public e-services > Abstract
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The quote only partly states this claim.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“With regard to the coefficients, only trust in the public e-service yielded a significant effect on continuance intentions (b = 0.218, p < 0.01), whereas the other trust constructs did not relate significantly to our dependent variable.”
§ Trust transfer in the continued usage of public e-services > 6.2.1. Rival model I: no mediation
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Feelings of trust also created by interpersonal and public administration recommendations, and e-service quality.”
§ Trust transfer in the continued usage of public e-services > 9. Conclusion
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesThe quote only partly states this claim.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Feelings of trust also created by interpersonal and public administration recommendations, and e-service quality.”
§ Trust transfer in the continued usage of public e-services > 9. Conclusion
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesThe quote only partly states this claim.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Controlling for perceived usefulness and satisfaction, we find a significant, positive effect of trust in the e-service on users' continuance intentions, an influence almost on par with that of perceived usefulness.”
§ Trust transfer in the continued usage of public e-services > 8. Discussion
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“With a rival model analysis, we also confirm the importance of the transfer process in optimizing continuance intentions, because we found no direct effects of trust in the public administration or the Internet on continuance intentions.”
§ Trust transfer in the continued usage of public e-services > 8. Discussion
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“We also acknowledge that perceived usefulness and satisfaction constitute primary drivers of continuance intentions [14,99].”
§ Trust transfer in the continued usage of public e-services > 1. Introduction
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [14] 14. A. Bhattacherjee, Understanding information systems continuance: An expec- tation-confirmation model, MIS Quart. 25 (3), 2001, pp. 351-370. source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [99] 99. B. Vatanasombut, M. Igbaria, A. Stylianou, W. Rodgers, Information systems continuance intention of web-based applications customers: The case of online banking, Inform. Manage. 45 (7), 2008, pp. 419-428. source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“It occurs when a person develops trust in an entity because of her or his trust in a related entity [90].”
§ Trust transfer in the continued usage of public e-services > 2.3. Trust transfer
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [90] 90. K. Stewart, Trust transfer on the world wide web, Org. Sci. 14 (1), 2003, pp. 5-17. source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“Trust is essential to maintaining ongoing relationships and countering uncertain situations [9,64]”
§ Trust transfer in the continued usage of public e-services > 1. Introduction
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [9] 9. Y. Bart, V. Shankar, F. Sultan, G. Urban, Are the drivers and role of online trust the same for all web sites and consumers? A large-scale exploratory empirical study J. Market. 69 (4), 2005, pp. 133-152. source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [64] 64. D. McKnight, N. Chervany, What trust means in e-commerce customer relation- ships: an interdisciplinary conceptual typology, Int. J. Electron. Comm. 6 (2), 2001, pp. 35-59. source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We developed a first version of the scales on the basis of an extensive review of online trust literature, which helped ensure content validity.”
§ Trust transfer in the continued usage of public e-services > 5. Measure validation
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“By accounting for these variables and their high explanatory power, we ensure that any significant effect of the three trust variables in our study is robust.”
§ Trust transfer in the continued usage of public e-services > 1. Introduction
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“Trust can be assessed by beliefs or intentions [63,70].”
§ Trust transfer in the continued usage of public e-services > 5. Measure validation
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [63] 63. D. McKnight, L. Cummings, N. Chervany, Initial trust formation in new organi- zational relationships, Acad. Manage. Rev. 23 (3), 1998, pp. 473-490. source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [70] 70. C. Moorman, R. Deshpande ´, G. Zaltman, Factors affecting trust in market research relationships, J. Market. 57, 1993, pp. 81-101. source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We therefore confirm a full mediating role of trust in the public e-service.”
- Also stated in: § 8. Discussion · plain
“we conclude in particular that trust in the public e-service mediates between trust in the public administration and continuance intentions, as well as between trust in the Internet and continuance intentions.”
§ Trust transfer in the continued usage of public e-services > 6.2.2. Rival model II: partial mediation
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Also stated in: § 8. Discussion · plain
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Additional antecedents include e-service quality and recommendations from both public administrations and interpersonal sources.”
§ Trust transfer in the continued usage of public e-services > 8. Discussion
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“In modern society, time is an increasingly scarce resource, and many people believe that employing time efficiently is essential to improving their quality of life [28].”
§ Trust transfer in the continued usage of public e-services > 7. Post hoc analysis: Moderating effect of time consciousness
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [28] 28. M. Dijst, M. Kwan, Accessibility and quality of life: time-geographic perspectives, in: K.P. Donaghy, S. Poppelreuter, G. Rudinger (Eds.), Social Dimensions of Sustainable Transport: Transatlantic Perspectives, Ashgate Publishing Limited, Aldershot, England, 2005, pp. 109-126.
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
None of the sources cited for this claim could be matched to a paper in Crossref, so there is nothing to check it against.
In the paper
“In Table 2, we compare the socio-demographic profile of the sample with that of Spanish users of transactional e-government services [47] and Spanish Internet users [80]; we find similar patterns across the three samples, with some slight differences that represent the specific profile of taxpayers (higher representation of middle-aged people, slightly higher representation of men [1]).”
§ Trust transfer in the continued usage of public e-services > 4. Data collection
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [47] 47. Instituto Nacional de Estadı ´stica. Encuesta sobre Equipamiento y Uso de Tec- nologı ´as de la Informacio ´n y Comunicacio ´n en los hogares 2011. Retrieved from: http://www.ine.es/jaxi/menu.do?type=pcaxis&path=/t25/p450&file=inebase, 2011.
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites [80] 80. RED.ES, Perfil sociodemogra ´fico de los internautas: Ana ´lisis de datos INE 2008, 2009. Retrieved from http://www.ontsi.red.es/estudios-informes/109, 2009.
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites [1] 1. AEAT, Estadı ´stica de los declarantes del IRPF 2008: Agencia Estatal de la Admin- istracio ´n Tributaria, 2009.
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedn = 3Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“trust in an e-service reassures the user of the stable relationship with the service provider while also providing evidence that it is unlikely the system will break down or lose its value in the future [99].”
§ Trust transfer in the continued usage of public e-services > 3.5. Trust in public e-service as an antecedent of continuance intentions
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [99] 99. B. Vatanasombut, M. Igbaria, A. Stylianou, W. Rodgers, Information systems continuance intention of web-based applications customers: The case of online banking, Inform. Manage. 45 (7), 2008, pp. 419-428. source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“To prevent respondents from displaying consistency motifs in their answers and meaningfully separate the trust entities, several sections of the survey adopted divergent layouts.”
§ Trust transfer in the continued usage of public e-services > 5. Measure validation
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Because independent entities simultaneously participate in public e-service provision, trust might be attributed to different referents.”
§ Trust transfer in the continued usage of public e-services > General trust and trust in online offer
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“trust constitutes an essential element of longterm relationships [71]”
§ Trust transfer in the continued usage of public e-services > 3.5. Trust in public e-service as an antecedent of continuance intentions
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [71] 71. R. Morgan, S. Hunt, The commitment-trust theory of relationship marketing, J. Market. 58 (3), 1994, pp. 20-38. source
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Most studies focus on a single recommending source at a time, such as interpersonal or consumer-to-consumer recommendations [55,102], but users could receive recommendations about public e-services from different sources, which may help them better assess the trustworthiness of different elements in the e-service system.”
§ Trust transfer in the continued usage of public e-services > 1. Introduction
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This general conceptualization enables us to overcome the difficulty of asking citizens to assess specific properties of impersonal entities, such as benevolence.”
§ Trust transfer in the continued usage of public e-services > 5. Measure validation
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“To test for convergent validity, we confirmed that all factor loadings were significant (at 0.01) and exceeded 0.5 [89].The average variance extracted (AVE) values were all greater than 0.5 (Table 4).”
§ Trust transfer in the continued usage of public e-services > 5. Measure validation
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [89] 89. J. Steenkamp, I. Geyskens, How country characteristics affect the perceived value of Web sites, J. Market. 70 (3), 2006, pp. 136-150. source
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Following previous literature, and to increase the internal validity of our analysis, we consider perceived usefulness and satisfaction as control variables that should affect continuance intentions.”
§ Trust transfer in the continued usage of public e-services > 3.6. Control variables
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“Previous research shows that intentions for continued usage relate to other psychological constructs, such as perceived usefulness and satisfaction [14,99].”
§ Trust transfer in the continued usage of public e-services > 3.6. Control variables
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [14] 14. A. Bhattacherjee, Understanding information systems continuance: An expec- tation-confirmation model, MIS Quart. 25 (3), 2001, pp. 351-370. source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [99] 99. B. Vatanasombut, M. Igbaria, A. Stylianou, W. Rodgers, Information systems continuance intention of web-based applications customers: The case of online banking, Inform. Manage. 45 (7), 2008, pp. 419-428. source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“Consistent with previous e-government studies, we used measures based on beliefs of overall trust [17,46].”
§ Trust transfer in the continued usage of public e-services > 5. Measure validation
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [17] 17. L. Carter, F. Be ´langer, The utilization of e-government services: citizen trust, innovation and acceptance factors, Inform. Syst. J. 15 (1), 2005, pp. 5-25. source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [46] 46. S.-Y. Hung, C.-M. Chang, T.-J. Yu, Determinants of user acceptance of the e- Government services: The case of online tax filing and payment system, Govt. Inform. Quart. 23 (1), 2006, pp. 97-122. source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“Building on a dominant stream in e-service literature [24,31], we considered a fourdimensional, higher-order construct in which each E-S-QUAL subdimension was a single-order factor.”
§ Trust transfer in the continued usage of public e-services > 5. Measure validation
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [24] 24. E. Cristobal, C. Flavia ´n, M. Guinalı ´u, Perceived e-service quality (PeSQ): Mea- surement validation and effects on consumer satisfaction and web site loyalty, Manag. Serv. Qual. 17 (3), 2007, pp. 317-340. source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [31] 31. M. Fassnacht, I. Koese, Quality of electronic services, J. Serv. Res. 9 (1), 2006, pp. 19-37. source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“The transmission depends on the person's assessment of the entities' similarity, proximity, or belongingness to a trusted referent [40,90].”
§ Trust transfer in the continued usage of public e-services > 2.3. Trust transfer
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [40] 40. K. Grayson, D. Johnson, D.-F.R. Chen, Is firm trust essential in a trusted envi- ronment? How trust in the business context influence customers J. Market. Res. 45, 2008, pp. 241-256. source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [90] 90. K. Stewart, Trust transfer on the world wide web, Org. Sci. 14 (1), 2003, pp. 5-17. source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“We tested the face validity of the adapted measures using a variation of Zaichkowsky's [105] method: We asked a panel of 10 experts to classify each item as ''clearly representative,'' ''somewhat representative,'' or ''not representative'' of the focal construct.We retained items that produced a high level of consensus among the experts [60].”
§ Trust transfer in the continued usage of public e-services > 5. Measure validation
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [105] 105. J. Zaichkowsky, Measuring the involvement construct, J. Cons. Res. 12 (3), 1985, pp. 341-352. source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [60] 60. D. Lichtenstein, R. Netemeyer, S. Burton, Distinguishing coupon proneness from value consciousness: an acquisition-transaction utility theory perspective, J. Market. 54 (3), 1990, pp. 54-67. source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This makes others' recommendations less useful to shape beliefs and may apparently even introduce a negative influence.”
§ Trust transfer in the continued usage of public e-services > 8. Discussion
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“In Hofstede's [44] taxonomy for example, higher power distance cultures tend to obey governmental regulations and procedures [4].”
§ Trust transfer in the continued usage of public e-services > 8.2. Limitations and further research
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [4] 4. C. Akkaya, P. Wolf, H. Krcmar, The Role of Trust in E-Government Adoption: A Literature Review. Paper presented at the AMCIS 2010, Lima, Peru, 2010.
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
In the paper
“In line with previous findings in e-government [12], Internet-savvy users do not automatically develop a high level of trust in a public e-service; they must trust public administrations before they will do so.”
§ Trust transfer in the continued usage of public e-services > 8. Discussion
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [12] 12. A. Beldad, T. Van der Geest, M. de Jong, M. Steehouder, Shall I tell you where I live and who I am? Factors influencing the behavioral intention to disclose personal data for online government transactions Int. J. Hum. Comp. Interact. 28 (3), 2012, pp. 163-177. source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“In addition, cultural values and social norms guide people's beliefs and behaviors [44], so people from different countries likely build trust perceptions differently [4].”
§ Trust transfer in the continued usage of public e-services > 8.2. Limitations and further research
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [44] 44. G. Hofstede, Culture's Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values, Sage Publications, Inc, London, 1980.
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Thus, Spanish citizens may be more sensitive to public e-services' trust perceptions.”
§ Trust transfer in the continued usage of public e-services > 8.2. Limitations and further research
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“However, people in cultures characterized by a higher uncertainty avoidance are more concerned about risks and desire higher levels of trust [4], and here, Spain's level of uncertainty avoidance is 22% higher than the world average [45].”
§ Trust transfer in the continued usage of public e-services > 8.2. Limitations and further research
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [4] 4. C. Akkaya, P. Wolf, H. Krcmar, The Role of Trust in E-Government Adoption: A Literature Review. Paper presented at the AMCIS 2010, Lima, Peru, 2010.
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
The paper relies on this without support.
The sample of users had sufficient knowledge about the e-service to respond to all the survey questions.
“The resulting sample of users had sufficient knowledge about the e-service to respond to all the survey questions.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The sample of users of Spanish public e-services is comparable to online users in Europe.
“Second, our analyses are based on a sample of users of Spanish public e-services, comparable to online users in Europe.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Public e-services are not a popular conversation topic.
“Because public e-services are not a popular conversation topic, citizens who receive interpersonal recommendations may regard the endorsements as representative of a small or irrelevant user group.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Trust influences users' intentions to continue using e-services.
“In modern society, where services have become increasingly electronic in nature, trust influences users' intentions to continue using e-services.”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Fulfillment scale has four listed items, not three
MinorThe methods say each e-service-quality dimension used three items, but the appendix lists four fulfillment items, FUL1 through FUL4.
“Thus we employed three items for each of the four dimensions.”
“FUL1. . ..is truthful about its offerings.FUL2. . ..delivers results as promised.FUL3. . . .works according to my orders.FUL4. . ..makes accurate promises about transactions.”
Citations
Cites
Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.2307/3151312 · Cited by 109,314
Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/002224378101800104 · Cited by 109,190
Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology
Davis, F. D. (1989) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/249008 · Cited by 68,483
Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach
Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.411 · Cited by 41,941
The commitment-trust theory of relationship marketing
Morgan, R. M., & Hunt, S. D. (1994) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1177/002224299405800302 · Cited by 22,355
Culture's Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values
Gladwin, T. N., & Hofstede, G. (1981) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/257651 · Cited by 20,550
From Intentions to Actions: A Theory of Planned Behavior
Ajzen, I. (1985) · Action Control · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-69746-3_2 · Cited by 19,057
Information Theory and an Extension of the Maximum Likelihood Principle
Akaike, H. (1998) · Springer series in statistics · doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-1694-0_15 · Cited by 18,636
Culture's Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values.
Sorge, A. M., & Hofstede, G. (1983) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2393017 · Cited by 15,195
Asymptotic Confidence Intervals for Indirect Effects in Structural Equation Models
Sobel, M. E. (1982) · Sociological Methodology · doi:10.2307/270723 · Cited by 12,810
Flagged first, then by citations
10 of the 121 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Jorgensen, 2002, Facing the challenges of e-government: A case study of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas, SAM Adv. Manage. J., 67, 15
- Oliver, 1981, Measurement and evaluation of satisfaction process in retailer selling, J. Retail., 57, 25
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–200 of 204
Shao, Z., Zhang, L., Meng, T., & Zhang, J. (2024) · Electronic Markets · doi:10.1007/s12525-024-00742-y · Cited by 14
Watch who you trust! A structured literature review to build a typology of e-government risks
Distel, B., Koelmann, H., Plattfaut, R., & Becker, J. (2022) · Information Systems and e-Business Management · doi:10.1007/s10257-022-00573-4 · Cited by 20
Role of shared identity and agency trust in online voting among Finnish citizens
Farooq, A., Warkentin, M. E., & Virtanen, S. (2023) · Technology in Society · doi:10.1016/j.techsoc.2023.102429 · Cited by 13
Quansah, T. K. (2022) · European Sport Management Quarterly · doi:10.1080/16184742.2022.2125549 · Cited by 17
P., P., Natarajan, T., & Dhalmahapatra, K. (2025) · Digital Policy, Regulation and Governance · doi:10.1108/dprg-08-2024-0178 · Cited by 13
Understanding the Necessary Conditions of Multi-Source Trust Transfer in Artificial Intelligence
Renner, M., Lins, S., Söllner, M., Thiebes, S., & Sunyaev, A. (2022) · Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS) · doi:10.24251/hicss.2022.717 · Cited by 10
Santamaría-Philco, A., & Wimmer, M. A. (2018) · Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research · doi:10.1145/3209281.3209286 · Cited by 10
Yu, T., Pan, Y., & Jang, W. (2025) · Journal of theoretical and applied electronic commerce research · doi:10.3390/jtaer20040257 · Cited by 10
Guo, Y.-F., & Lei, Y. (2025) · The International Journal of Press/Politics · doi:10.1177/19401612251315597 · Cited by 8
Cheng, X., Qiao, L., Yang, B., & Han, R. (2023) · Electronic Commerce Research · doi:10.1007/s10660-023-09679-4 · Cited by 16
The Acceptance of Electronic Voting Machines in India: A UTAUT approach
Chauhan, S., Jaiswal, M. P., & Kar, A. K. (2018) · Electronic Government an International Journal · doi:10.1504/eg.2018.10011841 · Cited by 9
Categorizing Obstacles in e-Government
Pereira, G. V., Rinnerbauer, B., Ginner, M., & Parycek, P. (2017) · International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance · doi:10.1145/3047273.3047367 · Cited by 10
Trust in Government or in Technology? What Really Drives Internet Voting
Abdala, M. B., Plescia, C., Boyer, M. M., & Brunetti, A. L. (2025) · Political Research Quarterly · doi:10.1177/10659129251321424 · Cited by 11
Design of a single window system for e-government services: the chilean case
Cataldo, A., Ferrer, J., Rey, P. A., & Sauré, A. (2017) · Journal of Industrial and Management Optimization · doi:10.3934/jimo.2017060 · Cited by 10
Liang, L., Sun, Y., & Yang, B. (2025) · Aslib Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1108/ajim-08-2024-0684 · Cited by 10
What Piques Users’ Curiosity on Open Innovation Platforms? An Analysis Based on Mobile App Stores
Liu, X., Jiang, N., Fu, M., Cai, Z., Lim, E. T. K., & Tan, C. (2022) · Information Systems Frontiers · doi:10.1007/s10796-022-10312-2 · Cited by 8
Examining consumers' continuance and sharing intention toward food delivery apps
Goyal, S., Chauhan, S., Gajpal, Y., & Bhardwaj, A. K. (2023) · Journal of Enterprise Information Management · doi:10.1108/jeim-01-2023-0006 · Cited by 10
Song, Y., Natori, T., & Xintao, Y. U. (2025) · Administrative Sciences · doi:10.3390/admsci15080308 · Cited by 12
Wang, J., Shahzad, F., Khan, I., & Siyal, A. W. (2022) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.848931 · Cited by 8
The Role of Cultural Intelligence in the Relationship Between Platform Trust and Loyalty
Meng, T., Alam, F., Nawaz, M. Z., et al. (2021) · International Journal of Online Marketing · doi:10.4018/ijom.2021040102 · Cited by 8
Public interest in continued use of Chinese government portals: A mixed methods study
Tang, Z., Gong, Z., Han, X. J., & Peng, X. (2018) · Telematics and Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.tele.2018.09.011 · Cited by 7
eServices Classification, Trends, and Analysis: A Systematic Mapping Study
Saleemi, M., Anjum, M., & Rehman, M. (2017) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2017.2766287 · Cited by 7
Governance Design of Collaborative Intelligence for Public Policy and Services
Chen, Y., Liu, H. K., & Wang, Y.-F. (2024) · Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research · doi:10.1145/3657054.3657075 · Cited by 9
Factors Influencing Trust in Smart City Services
Trutnev, D., & Vidiasova, L. А. (2019) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-27325-5_27 · Cited by 7
Harnessing Swift Guanxi in SMEs: Exploring Trust and Purchase Intention on Social Commerce Platforms
John, J. K., Qiu, X., & Kilumile, J. W. (2024) · Journal of theoretical and applied electronic commerce research · doi:10.3390/jtaer19040153 · Cited by 7
The Perceived Influence Model of Trust: Toward a Multi-Trustee Theory
PytlikZillig, L. M., Votruba, A. M., Fleig-Palmer, M. M., Lee, J., & Kappmeier, M. (2024) · Group & Organization Management · doi:10.1177/10596011241235248 · Cited by 6
Examining Consumers' Behavioral Intentions Towards Online Home Services Applications
Chauhan, S., Gajpal, Y., Bhardwaj, B., Kumar, P., Goyal, S., Yang, X., & Bhardwaj, A. K. (2023) · Journal of Global Information Management · doi:10.4018/jgim.326547 · Cited by 10
Predicting User Motivation Towards Retention of e-Services: An NLP-based Approach
Ray, A., & Bala, P. K. (2019) · International Journal of Business and Administrative Studies · doi:10.20469/ijbas.5.10001-1 · Cited by 5
Explicating Trust-building Factors Impacting the Use of e-government Services
AlAwadhi, S. A., Al‐Ansari, H., & Alsaber, A. (2023) · Social Science Computer Review · doi:10.1177/08944393231220757 · Cited by 14
Navigating digital encounters: insights from frontline professionals on public service delivery
Kirjavainen, H., & Jalonen, H. (2025) · International Journal of Public Sector Management · doi:10.1108/ijpsm-04-2024-0117 · Cited by 5
Building Trust in E-Commerce: A Practical Trust Guide for Evaluation
Çevik, F., & Koç, T. (2022) · Alphanumeric Journal · doi:10.17093/alphanumeric.1133328 · Cited by 4
Research on Public Adoption Willingness of “Internet + Government Affairs” in Blockchain Industry
Li, Q. (2021) · Complexity · doi:10.1155/2021/5876656 · Cited by 4
Inter‐ versus intra‐channel trust transfer on an online‐to‐offline (O2O) platform
Ma, Z., Wang, L., Li, E. P. H., & Zhang, J. (2021) · Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences / Revue Canadienne des Sciences de l Administration · doi:10.1002/cjas.1654 · Cited by 4
He, Y., Sheng, Z., Lytle, B., & Yao, X. (2025) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.2895 · Cited by 3
Madli, F., Sondoh, S. L., Totu, A., Ramayah, T., Janin, Y., Annuar, S. N. S., & Cham, T. (2023) · International Journal of Pharmaceutical and Healthcare Marketing · doi:10.1108/ijphm-08-2022-0077 · Cited by 6
Why does people use e-payment systems in C2C e-marketplace? a trust transfer perspective
Tombe, R. S., Budi, N. F. A., Hidayanto, A. N., Ekawati, R. K., & Anussornnitisarn, P. (2017) · International Conference on Informatics and Computing (ICIC) · doi:10.1109/iac.2017.8280628 · Cited by 3
The Antecedents of Trust and Their Influence on M-Health Adoption
Fitriani, W. R., Wicaksono, A. F., Joewono, D. G., Zaffar, M. Z., Shahputra, R. A., Ronnavelly, Z., Hidayanto, A. N., & Stefanus, L. Y. (2020) · International Conference on Informatics and Computing (ICIC) · doi:10.1109/icic50835.2020.9288521 · Cited by 3
Panakaje, N., Parvin, S. M. R., Sheikh, N., Irfana, S., Madhura, K., Raj, J., & Soubhari, T. (2025) · Investment Management and Financial Innovations · doi:10.21511/imfi.22(1).2025.34 · Cited by 4
Dong, W. X., Asmi, F., Zhou, R., Keren, F., & Anwar, M. (2017) · IEEE International Conference on e-Business Engineering (ICEBE) · doi:10.1109/icebe.2017.37 · Cited by 3
Trust transfer in the adoption of autonomous last mile services toward digital urban system
Wang, S., & Huang, Z. (2024) · Digital engineering. · doi:10.1016/j.dte.2024.100030 · Cited by 4
A Dual-Role Trust Model for Social Media Influencers: The Paradox of Perceived Friendship
Chen, S., Xu, X., Min, Q., & Liu, L. (2024) · Social Science Computer Review · doi:10.1177/08944393241311586 · Cited by 3
Li, M., & Huang, S. (2025) · Electronic Commerce Research and Applications · doi:10.1016/j.elerap.2025.101566 · Cited by 3
Gao, E., Liu, Y., Zhou, Y., Guo, J., & Chen, Z. (2025) · International Journal of Human-Computer Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2025.103551 · Cited by 5
Artificial Intelligence-Driven Convergence and its Moderating Effect on Multi-Source Trust Transfer
Renner, M., Lins, S., Söllner, M., Järvenpää, S. L., & Sunyaev, A. (2023) · Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS) · doi:10.24251/hicss.2023.637 · Cited by 2
Wang, X., Huang, S. S., Kim, E., & Xu, J. (2024) · Cornell Hospitality Quarterly · doi:10.1177/19389655241268086 · Cited by 2
Trustworthiness in Indonesia healthcare: fostering loyalty in B2B relationships
Rinenggo, A., Sudiro, A., Sunaryo, S., & Hussein, A. S. (2024) · Cogent Business & Management · doi:10.1080/23311975.2024.2371991 · Cited by 7
A systematic review of research on digital mobile payment apps
Yue, L. (2025) · Telematics and Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.tele.2025.102345 · Cited by 2
Long, Y., Yang, K., Huang, R., Yuan, G., & Xia, Y. (2025) · Telematics and Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.tele.2025.102355 · Cited by 5
Erdoğan, G. (2023) · Business and Economics Research Journal · doi:10.20409/berj.2023.417 · Cited by 1
Active Ownership as an E-Service Management Practice in Transformational Government
Sneiders, E. (2024) · International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance · doi:10.1145/3680127.3680153 · Cited by 3
Rantanen, T., Järveläinen, E., & Leppälahti, T. (2025) · Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/casp.70055 · Cited by 1
Penco, L., & Profumo, G. (2022) · Sinergie Italian Journal of Management · doi:10.7433/s117.2022.06 · Cited by 1
Community Acceptance of SIKESAL: An UTAUT Model Approach in E-Government Services in Jambi City
Bulya, B., & Pribadi, U. (2024) · Scientific Journal of Informatics · doi:10.15294/sji.v11i3.7511 · Cited by 2
Chang, H. H., Yeh, S., Lin, Y.-H., Yeh, Y.-A., & Fan, C. H. (2025) · Behaviour and Information Technology · doi:10.1080/0144929x.2025.2560547 · Cited by 1
Kang, J.-M. (2025) · doi:10.31124/advance.174773431.13141953/v1 · Cited by 1
Kim, J., Ang, D. S., & Gang-Hoon, K. (2021) · International Journal of Business and Applied Social Science · doi:10.33642/ijbass.v7n6p5
Zhe, X. S., & Qiu, V. (2024) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.31235/osf.io/q8y26 · Cited by 1
Trust in electronic governments: A vision of their influence factors
Santamaría-Philco, A., Quiroz-Palma, P., Zamora, W., Mendoza, D. M., & Panchana, E. (2018) · Iberian Conference on Information Systems and Technologies (CISTI) · doi:10.23919/cisti.2018.8399421 · Cited by 1
Factors Influencing Trust in E-government Services: A Meta-analytic Review
Gupta, P., & Chauhan, S. (2024) · International Conference on eDemocracy & eGovernment · doi:10.1109/icedeg61611.2024.10702083 · Cited by 4
Trust in Times of Cyber Crisis: Understanding Organizational Trust Repair in the Public Sector
Nowak, D., & Distel, B. (2024) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-70274-7_9 · Cited by 4
Kurniasari, R., Primayasari, E. T., & Yuniarty, Y. (2022) · International Conference on Business and Industrial Research (ICBIR) · doi:10.1109/icbir54589.2022.9786415 · Cited by 1
Electronic-Acquisition Software’s Key Factors And Subsequent Impact: Points Of View From User’s
Khalique, R., Asim, M., & Manzoor, S. (2020) · European Journal of Business Management and Research · doi:10.24018/ejbmr.2020.5.1.177 · Cited by 1
- Retracted
The Impact of Consumer Culture on Innovation Adoption in Developing Countries
Eneizan, B. M., Saraswat, S., Ngah, A. H., Enaizan, O., & Alsakarneh, A. A. A. (2023) · Foresight-Russia · doi:10.17323/2500-2597.2023.3.32.43 · Cited by 2
Cultural diversity and users’ trust in e-government platforms: a meta-analytic insight
Gupta, P., & Chauhan, S. (2025) · Transforming Government People Process and Policy · doi:10.1108/tg-01-2025-0006 · Cited by 1
Shin, Y. H., Jung, S. E., & Kim, H. (2026) · Journal of Foodservice Business Research · doi:10.1080/15378020.2026.2667304
Liu, J., Yang, Y., Li, N., Tao, X., & Xin, X. (2026) · Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics · doi:10.1108/apjml-08-2025-1739
Societal Impact of Public Service Reforms
Bezzina, F. H., Camilleri, E., & Marmarà, V. (2021) · Public administration, governance and globalization · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-74357-4_9 · Cited by 1
The Influence of Dual Roles on Review Helpfulness: A Trust Transfer Perspective
Chen, S., Xu, X., Min, Q., & Liu, L. (2024) · International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2024.2443528
Trust Transfer in a Complex Technology Configuration (Ctc)Preprint
Agogo, D., Wright, R. T., Miltgen, C. L., & Milne, G. R. (2020) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3778739
Pembentukan E-Loyalty dengan Framework Kepercayaan - Multidimensi pada E-Commerce di Indonesia
Program Magister Manajemen, S. B. D. E., Yasin, A. Y., Wirawan, H., Program Magister Manajemen, S. B. D. E., Hanifa, M. F., Program Magister Manajemen, S. B. D. E., Bernadeta, N., Program Magister Manajemen, S. B. D. E., Burman, S., & Program Magister Manajemen, S. B. D. E. (2021) · PERWIRA - Jurnal Pendidikan Kewirausahaan Indonesia · doi:10.21632/perwira.4.1.13-35
What makes you trust digital data wallets? Antecedents of trust formation
Keba, V., Dhillon, G. S., & Oliveira, T. (2026) · Journal of Enterprise Information Management · doi:10.1108/jeim-12-2025-1258
The Paradox of Friendship as a Dual-role Trust Model for Social Media Influencers
Chen, S., Chen, S., Xu, X., & Lin, L. I. U. (2026) · Information Systems Frontiers · doi:10.1007/s10796-026-10722-6
Jiang, H., Zhang, Z., Zhang, W., et al. (2022) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4122968
Unveiling the success of PIX: a Brazilian mobile instant payment system
Jóia, L. A., Lorenzo, M. F., & Marot, T. A. (2026) · Financial Innovation · doi:10.1186/s40854-026-00965-2
Chang, W., & Park, J. (2026) · Journal of Marketing Management · doi:10.1080/0267257x.2026.2715539
Koerich, A. B., Soares, S. V., Martins, C., & Casagrande, J. L. (2022) · CONTECSI - International Conference on Information Systems and Technology Management · doi:10.5748/18contecsi/com/gov/6844
Challenges and Issues in E-Banking Services and Operations in Developing Countries
Rana, P., & Pandey, D. (2015) · Advances in logistics, operations, and management science book series · doi:10.4018/978-1-4666-9720-1.ch013
Wang, Y., & Wang, J. (2022) · Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research/Advances in social science, education and humanities research · doi:10.2991/978-2-494069-31-2_140
Zerman, S., Koçoğlu, C. M., & Gedik, G. (2026) · Istanbul Business Research · doi:10.26650/ibr.2026.55.1569841
Digital Trust in Banking: Post Graduate Students Perspective
Modiha, P. (2025) · Springer proceedings in business and economics · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-84885-8_57 · Cited by 3
Towards the Framework of Active Ownership of a Public E-Service within Transformational Government
Sneiders, E., & Silvanto, P. (2025) · Complex Systems Informatics and Modeling Quarterly · doi:10.7250/csimq.2025-45.04
Carbonell, P., & Escudero, A. I. R. (2025) · International Journal of Bank Marketing · doi:10.1108/ijbm-05-2025-0341 · Cited by 1
Oesterreich, T. D., Anton, E., Söllner, M., & Teuteberg, F. (2026) · Information Technology and People · doi:10.1108/itp-05-2024-0683
Metadata
- Authors
- Belanche, D., Casaló, L. V., Flavián, C., & Schepers, J.
- Affiliations
- Universidad de Zaragoza (ES)
- Eindhoven University of Technology (NL)
- Corresponding author
- Schepers, Jeroen
- Venue
- Information & Management
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2014-09
- Volume
- 51
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 627-640
- ISSN
- 0378-7206 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1978270621
- Cited by
- 204
- References
- 121
- Citations by year
- 2026: 12 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 5
- FWCI
- 49.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Information & Management (publishedVersion)
- TU/e Research Portal (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- TU/e Research Portal (submittedVersion)
- TU/e Research Portal (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- Ministerio de Educación, Cultura y Deporte (AP2007-03817)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › E-Government and Public Services
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
- Keywords
- trust transfer, e-government services, continued usage, continuance intention, trust in public administration, online trust, e-service quality, time consciousness, e-government
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-11, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-11 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review