The DOI matches its Crossref record; 111 of the 121 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 1 of the 50 sources its claims cite were checked for support.
Trust transfer in the continued usage of public e-services
Open accessOverview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
1 of 50 cited sources checked · 1 supported · 0 flagged
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The relationship between interpersonal recommendations and trust in the e-service was nonsignificant”
§ Trust transfer in the continued usage of public e-services > Abstract
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Trust was influenced by e-service quality and recommendations from public administrations and interpersonal sources.”
§ Trust transfer in the continued usage of public e-services > Abstract
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Trust was influenced by e-service quality and recommendations from public administrations and interpersonal sources.”
§ Trust transfer in the continued usage of public e-services > Abstract
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Our results show that trust in the public e-service mediates the influence of both trust in the public administration and trust in the Internet on continuance intentions.”
§ Trust transfer in the continued usage of public e-services > Abstract
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Also in support of H4a-c, our results showed that recommendations made by public administrations influenced formations of trust in public administrations (b = 0.092, p < 0.10), the public e-service (b = 0.123, p < 0.01), and the Internet (b = 0.142, p < 0.05).”
§ Trust transfer in the continued usage of public e-services > 6.1. Hypothesis tests
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Finally, trust in the public e-service significantly related to continuance intentions (b = 0.148, p < 0.01), in support of H6.”
§ Trust transfer in the continued usage of public e-services > 6.1. Hypothesis tests
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“Our proposed model displayed better fit measures than rival model I.The CFI indicator of the rival model (0.917) was lower than the CFI of the proposed model (0.921) and its ratio of x 2 to degrees of freedom was slightly higher (3.565 versus 3.456).In addition, Akaike [3] recommends a model with lower AIC indicators over other models based on the same sample.On this criterion, our proposed model”
§ Trust transfer in the continued usage of public e-services > 6.2.1. Rival model I: no mediation
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [3] 3. H. Akaike, Information theory and an extension of the maximum likelihood principle. Paper presented at the International symposium on information theory, Budapest, Hungary, 1973.
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The AIC was similar but better in our proposed model (AIC = 280.88)compared with rival model II (AIC = 283.01).”
§ Trust transfer in the continued usage of public e-services > 6.2.2. Rival model II: partial mediation
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Also in support of H4a-c, our results showed that recommendations made by public administrations influenced formations of trust in public administrations (b = 0.092, p < 0.10), the public e-service (b = 0.123, p < 0.01), and the Internet (b = 0.142, p < 0.05).”
§ Trust transfer in the continued usage of public e-services > 6.1. Hypothesis tests
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“If we had ignored these controls, the effect of trust in the public e-service would have appeared much greater (b = 0.597, p < 0.001, see Basic model in Table 5).”
§ Trust transfer in the continued usage of public e-services > 6.1. Hypothesis tests
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passes
- Probably not a substantial claim. 23
- It may state two separate claims as one. 19
- The quote only partly states this claim. 3
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“To assess e-service quality, we used the E-S-QUAL scale [76], adapted to mitigate its focus on e-commerce.Thus we employed three items for each of the four dimensions.”
§ Trust transfer in the continued usage of public e-services > 5. Measure validation
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [76] 76. A. Parasuraman, V. Zeithaml, A. Malhotra, ES-QUAL: A multiple-item scale for assessing electronic service quality, J. Service Res. 7 (3), 2005, pp. 213-233. source
The introduction says E-S-QUAL was developed for online shopping sites, and the scale-development passage identifies its four dimensions. The paper’s original scale has 22 items; the citing authors describe the adaptation and selection of three items per dimension as their own methods, not as features of the source scale. (LLM, conf=0.92)
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Supported
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“we found a strong moderating influence of time consciousness”
- Also stated in: § 1. Introduction · plain
“we find that time-conscious users experience a negative impact of interpersonal recommendations, but their effect is positive for people who are less concerned about time as a scarce resource.”
§ Trust transfer in the continued usage of public e-services > Abstract
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Also stated in: § 1. Introduction · plain
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Trust was influenced by e-service quality and recommendations from public administrations and interpersonal sources.”
§ Trust transfer in the continued usage of public e-services > Abstract
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The quote only partly states this claim.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“With regard to the coefficients, only trust in the public e-service yielded a significant effect on continuance intentions (b = 0.218, p < 0.01), whereas the other trust constructs did not relate significantly to our dependent variable.”
§ Trust transfer in the continued usage of public e-services > 6.2.1. Rival model I: no mediation
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Feelings of trust also created by interpersonal and public administration recommendations, and e-service quality.”
§ Trust transfer in the continued usage of public e-services > 9. Conclusion
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesThe quote only partly states this claim.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Feelings of trust also created by interpersonal and public administration recommendations, and e-service quality.”
§ Trust transfer in the continued usage of public e-services > 9. Conclusion
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesThe quote only partly states this claim.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Controlling for perceived usefulness and satisfaction, we find a significant, positive effect of trust in the e-service on users' continuance intentions, an influence almost on par with that of perceived usefulness.”
§ Trust transfer in the continued usage of public e-services > 8. Discussion
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“With a rival model analysis, we also confirm the importance of the transfer process in optimizing continuance intentions, because we found no direct effects of trust in the public administration or the Internet on continuance intentions.”
§ Trust transfer in the continued usage of public e-services > 8. Discussion
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“We also acknowledge that perceived usefulness and satisfaction constitute primary drivers of continuance intentions [14,99].”
§ Trust transfer in the continued usage of public e-services > 1. Introduction
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [14] 14. A. Bhattacherjee, Understanding information systems continuance: An expec- tation-confirmation model, MIS Quart. 25 (3), 2001, pp. 351-370. source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [99] 99. B. Vatanasombut, M. Igbaria, A. Stylianou, W. Rodgers, Information systems continuance intention of web-based applications customers: The case of online banking, Inform. Manage. 45 (7), 2008, pp. 419-428. source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“It occurs when a person develops trust in an entity because of her or his trust in a related entity [90].”
§ Trust transfer in the continued usage of public e-services > 2.3. Trust transfer
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [90] 90. K. Stewart, Trust transfer on the world wide web, Org. Sci. 14 (1), 2003, pp. 5-17. source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“Trust is essential to maintaining ongoing relationships and countering uncertain situations [9,64]”
§ Trust transfer in the continued usage of public e-services > 1. Introduction
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [9] 9. Y. Bart, V. Shankar, F. Sultan, G. Urban, Are the drivers and role of online trust the same for all web sites and consumers? A large-scale exploratory empirical study J. Market. 69 (4), 2005, pp. 133-152. source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [64] 64. D. McKnight, N. Chervany, What trust means in e-commerce customer relation- ships: an interdisciplinary conceptual typology, Int. J. Electron. Comm. 6 (2), 2001, pp. 35-59. source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We developed a first version of the scales on the basis of an extensive review of online trust literature, which helped ensure content validity.”
§ Trust transfer in the continued usage of public e-services > 5. Measure validation
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“By accounting for these variables and their high explanatory power, we ensure that any significant effect of the three trust variables in our study is robust.”
§ Trust transfer in the continued usage of public e-services > 1. Introduction
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“Trust can be assessed by beliefs or intentions [63,70].”
§ Trust transfer in the continued usage of public e-services > 5. Measure validation
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [63] 63. D. McKnight, L. Cummings, N. Chervany, Initial trust formation in new organi- zational relationships, Acad. Manage. Rev. 23 (3), 1998, pp. 473-490. source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [70] 70. C. Moorman, R. Deshpande ´, G. Zaltman, Factors affecting trust in market research relationships, J. Market. 57, 1993, pp. 81-101. source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We therefore confirm a full mediating role of trust in the public e-service.”
- Also stated in: § 8. Discussion · plain
“we conclude in particular that trust in the public e-service mediates between trust in the public administration and continuance intentions, as well as between trust in the Internet and continuance intentions.”
§ Trust transfer in the continued usage of public e-services > 6.2.2. Rival model II: partial mediation
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Also stated in: § 8. Discussion · plain
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Additional antecedents include e-service quality and recommendations from both public administrations and interpersonal sources.”
§ Trust transfer in the continued usage of public e-services > 8. Discussion
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“In modern society, time is an increasingly scarce resource, and many people believe that employing time efficiently is essential to improving their quality of life [28].”
§ Trust transfer in the continued usage of public e-services > 7. Post hoc analysis: Moderating effect of time consciousness
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [28] 28. M. Dijst, M. Kwan, Accessibility and quality of life: time-geographic perspectives, in: K.P. Donaghy, S. Poppelreuter, G. Rudinger (Eds.), Social Dimensions of Sustainable Transport: Transatlantic Perspectives, Ashgate Publishing Limited, Aldershot, England, 2005, pp. 109-126.
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
None of the sources cited for this claim could be matched to a paper in Crossref, so there is nothing to check it against.
In the paper
“In Table 2, we compare the socio-demographic profile of the sample with that of Spanish users of transactional e-government services [47] and Spanish Internet users [80]; we find similar patterns across the three samples, with some slight differences that represent the specific profile of taxpayers (higher representation of middle-aged people, slightly higher representation of men [1]).”
§ Trust transfer in the continued usage of public e-services > 4. Data collection
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [47] 47. Instituto Nacional de Estadı ´stica. Encuesta sobre Equipamiento y Uso de Tec- nologı ´as de la Informacio ´n y Comunicacio ´n en los hogares 2011. Retrieved from: http://www.ine.es/jaxi/menu.do?type=pcaxis&path=/t25/p450&file=inebase, 2011.
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites [80] 80. RED.ES, Perfil sociodemogra ´fico de los internautas: Ana ´lisis de datos INE 2008, 2009. Retrieved from http://www.ontsi.red.es/estudios-informes/109, 2009.
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites [1] 1. AEAT, Estadı ´stica de los declarantes del IRPF 2008: Agencia Estatal de la Admin- istracio ´n Tributaria, 2009.
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedn = 3Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“trust in an e-service reassures the user of the stable relationship with the service provider while also providing evidence that it is unlikely the system will break down or lose its value in the future [99].”
§ Trust transfer in the continued usage of public e-services > 3.5. Trust in public e-service as an antecedent of continuance intentions
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [99] 99. B. Vatanasombut, M. Igbaria, A. Stylianou, W. Rodgers, Information systems continuance intention of web-based applications customers: The case of online banking, Inform. Manage. 45 (7), 2008, pp. 419-428. source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“To prevent respondents from displaying consistency motifs in their answers and meaningfully separate the trust entities, several sections of the survey adopted divergent layouts.”
§ Trust transfer in the continued usage of public e-services > 5. Measure validation
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Because independent entities simultaneously participate in public e-service provision, trust might be attributed to different referents.”
§ Trust transfer in the continued usage of public e-services > General trust and trust in online offer
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“trust constitutes an essential element of longterm relationships [71]”
§ Trust transfer in the continued usage of public e-services > 3.5. Trust in public e-service as an antecedent of continuance intentions
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [71] 71. R. Morgan, S. Hunt, The commitment-trust theory of relationship marketing, J. Market. 58 (3), 1994, pp. 20-38. source
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Most studies focus on a single recommending source at a time, such as interpersonal or consumer-to-consumer recommendations [55,102], but users could receive recommendations about public e-services from different sources, which may help them better assess the trustworthiness of different elements in the e-service system.”
§ Trust transfer in the continued usage of public e-services > 1. Introduction
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This general conceptualization enables us to overcome the difficulty of asking citizens to assess specific properties of impersonal entities, such as benevolence.”
§ Trust transfer in the continued usage of public e-services > 5. Measure validation
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“To test for convergent validity, we confirmed that all factor loadings were significant (at 0.01) and exceeded 0.5 [89].The average variance extracted (AVE) values were all greater than 0.5 (Table 4).”
§ Trust transfer in the continued usage of public e-services > 5. Measure validation
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [89] 89. J. Steenkamp, I. Geyskens, How country characteristics affect the perceived value of Web sites, J. Market. 70 (3), 2006, pp. 136-150. source
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Following previous literature, and to increase the internal validity of our analysis, we consider perceived usefulness and satisfaction as control variables that should affect continuance intentions.”
§ Trust transfer in the continued usage of public e-services > 3.6. Control variables
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“Previous research shows that intentions for continued usage relate to other psychological constructs, such as perceived usefulness and satisfaction [14,99].”
§ Trust transfer in the continued usage of public e-services > 3.6. Control variables
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [14] 14. A. Bhattacherjee, Understanding information systems continuance: An expec- tation-confirmation model, MIS Quart. 25 (3), 2001, pp. 351-370. source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [99] 99. B. Vatanasombut, M. Igbaria, A. Stylianou, W. Rodgers, Information systems continuance intention of web-based applications customers: The case of online banking, Inform. Manage. 45 (7), 2008, pp. 419-428. source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“Consistent with previous e-government studies, we used measures based on beliefs of overall trust [17,46].”
§ Trust transfer in the continued usage of public e-services > 5. Measure validation
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [17] 17. L. Carter, F. Be ´langer, The utilization of e-government services: citizen trust, innovation and acceptance factors, Inform. Syst. J. 15 (1), 2005, pp. 5-25. source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [46] 46. S.-Y. Hung, C.-M. Chang, T.-J. Yu, Determinants of user acceptance of the e- Government services: The case of online tax filing and payment system, Govt. Inform. Quart. 23 (1), 2006, pp. 97-122. source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“Building on a dominant stream in e-service literature [24,31], we considered a fourdimensional, higher-order construct in which each E-S-QUAL subdimension was a single-order factor.”
§ Trust transfer in the continued usage of public e-services > 5. Measure validation
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [24] 24. E. Cristobal, C. Flavia ´n, M. Guinalı ´u, Perceived e-service quality (PeSQ): Mea- surement validation and effects on consumer satisfaction and web site loyalty, Manag. Serv. Qual. 17 (3), 2007, pp. 317-340. source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [31] 31. M. Fassnacht, I. Koese, Quality of electronic services, J. Serv. Res. 9 (1), 2006, pp. 19-37. source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“The transmission depends on the person's assessment of the entities' similarity, proximity, or belongingness to a trusted referent [40,90].”
§ Trust transfer in the continued usage of public e-services > 2.3. Trust transfer
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [40] 40. K. Grayson, D. Johnson, D.-F.R. Chen, Is firm trust essential in a trusted envi- ronment? How trust in the business context influence customers J. Market. Res. 45, 2008, pp. 241-256. source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [90] 90. K. Stewart, Trust transfer on the world wide web, Org. Sci. 14 (1), 2003, pp. 5-17. source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“We tested the face validity of the adapted measures using a variation of Zaichkowsky's [105] method: We asked a panel of 10 experts to classify each item as ''clearly representative,'' ''somewhat representative,'' or ''not representative'' of the focal construct.We retained items that produced a high level of consensus among the experts [60].”
§ Trust transfer in the continued usage of public e-services > 5. Measure validation
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [105] 105. J. Zaichkowsky, Measuring the involvement construct, J. Cons. Res. 12 (3), 1985, pp. 341-352. source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [60] 60. D. Lichtenstein, R. Netemeyer, S. Burton, Distinguishing coupon proneness from value consciousness: an acquisition-transaction utility theory perspective, J. Market. 54 (3), 1990, pp. 54-67. source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This makes others' recommendations less useful to shape beliefs and may apparently even introduce a negative influence.”
§ Trust transfer in the continued usage of public e-services > 8. Discussion
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“In Hofstede's [44] taxonomy for example, higher power distance cultures tend to obey governmental regulations and procedures [4].”
§ Trust transfer in the continued usage of public e-services > 8.2. Limitations and further research
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [4] 4. C. Akkaya, P. Wolf, H. Krcmar, The Role of Trust in E-Government Adoption: A Literature Review. Paper presented at the AMCIS 2010, Lima, Peru, 2010.
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
In the paper
“In line with previous findings in e-government [12], Internet-savvy users do not automatically develop a high level of trust in a public e-service; they must trust public administrations before they will do so.”
§ Trust transfer in the continued usage of public e-services > 8. Discussion
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [12] 12. A. Beldad, T. Van der Geest, M. de Jong, M. Steehouder, Shall I tell you where I live and who I am? Factors influencing the behavioral intention to disclose personal data for online government transactions Int. J. Hum. Comp. Interact. 28 (3), 2012, pp. 163-177. source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“In addition, cultural values and social norms guide people's beliefs and behaviors [44], so people from different countries likely build trust perceptions differently [4].”
§ Trust transfer in the continued usage of public e-services > 8.2. Limitations and further research
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [44] 44. G. Hofstede, Culture's Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values, Sage Publications, Inc, London, 1980.
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Thus, Spanish citizens may be more sensitive to public e-services' trust perceptions.”
§ Trust transfer in the continued usage of public e-services > 8.2. Limitations and further research
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“However, people in cultures characterized by a higher uncertainty avoidance are more concerned about risks and desire higher levels of trust [4], and here, Spain's level of uncertainty avoidance is 22% higher than the world average [45].”
§ Trust transfer in the continued usage of public e-services > 8.2. Limitations and further research
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [4] 4. C. Akkaya, P. Wolf, H. Krcmar, The Role of Trust in E-Government Adoption: A Literature Review. Paper presented at the AMCIS 2010, Lima, Peru, 2010.
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
The paper relies on this without support.
The sample of users had sufficient knowledge about the e-service to respond to all the survey questions.
“The resulting sample of users had sufficient knowledge about the e-service to respond to all the survey questions.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The sample of users of Spanish public e-services is comparable to online users in Europe.
“Second, our analyses are based on a sample of users of Spanish public e-services, comparable to online users in Europe.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Public e-services are not a popular conversation topic.
“Because public e-services are not a popular conversation topic, citizens who receive interpersonal recommendations may regard the endorsements as representative of a small or irrelevant user group.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Trust influences users' intentions to continue using e-services.
“In modern society, where services have become increasingly electronic in nature, trust influences users' intentions to continue using e-services.”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Fulfillment scale has four listed items, not three
MinorThe methods say each e-service-quality dimension used three items, but the appendix lists four fulfillment items, FUL1 through FUL4.
“Thus we employed three items for each of the four dimensions.”
“FUL1. . ..is truthful about its offerings.FUL2. . ..delivers results as promised.FUL3. . . .works according to my orders.FUL4. . ..makes accurate promises about transactions.”
Citations
Cites
Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.2307/3151312 · Cited by 109,314
Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/002224378101800104 · Cited by 109,190
Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology
Davis, F. D. (1989) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/249008 · Cited by 68,483
Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach
Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.411 · Cited by 41,941
The commitment-trust theory of relationship marketing
Morgan, R. M., & Hunt, S. D. (1994) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1177/002224299405800302 · Cited by 22,355
Culture's Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values
Gladwin, T. N., & Hofstede, G. (1981) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/257651 · Cited by 20,550
From Intentions to Actions: A Theory of Planned Behavior
Ajzen, I. (1985) · Action Control · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-69746-3_2 · Cited by 19,057
Information Theory and an Extension of the Maximum Likelihood Principle
Akaike, H. (1998) · Springer series in statistics · doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-1694-0_15 · Cited by 18,636
Culture's Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values.
Sorge, A. M., & Hofstede, G. (1983) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2393017 · Cited by 15,195
Asymptotic Confidence Intervals for Indirect Effects in Structural Equation Models
Sobel, M. E. (1982) · Sociological Methodology · doi:10.2307/270723 · Cited by 12,810
Flagged first, then by citations
10 of the 121 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Jorgensen, 2002, Facing the challenges of e-government: A case study of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas, SAM Adv. Manage. J., 67, 15
- Oliver, 1981, Measurement and evaluation of satisfaction process in retailer selling, J. Retail., 57, 25
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 201–204 of 204
Which Type of AI ‐Based Public Services Are Citizens More Willing to Accept?
Miao, Q., & Yu, L. H. (2026) · Public Administration Review · doi:10.1111/puar.70150
Zhu, L., Li, H., & Shen, W. (2022) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4180095
Belanche, D., Casaló, L. V., & Flavián, C. (2026) · Journal of Travel Research · doi:10.1177/00472875261456334 · Cited by 1
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Belanche, D., Casaló, L. V., Flavián, C., & Schepers, J.
- Affiliations
- Universidad de Zaragoza (ES)
- Eindhoven University of Technology (NL)
- Corresponding author
- Schepers, Jeroen
- Venue
- Information & Management
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2014-09
- Volume
- 51
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 627-640
- ISSN
- 0378-7206 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1978270621
- Cited by
- 204
- References
- 121
- Citations by year
- 2026: 12 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 5
- FWCI
- 49.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Information & Management (publishedVersion)
- TU/e Research Portal (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- TU/e Research Portal (submittedVersion)
- TU/e Research Portal (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- Ministerio de Educación, Cultura y Deporte (AP2007-03817)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › E-Government and Public Services
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
- Keywords
- trust transfer, e-government services, continued usage, continuance intention, trust in public administration, online trust, e-service quality, time consciousness, e-government
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-11, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-11 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review