The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Understanding the interplay of social commerce affordances and swift guanxi: An empirical study
Abstract
Abstract Prior studies highlight consumer behavior in social commerce from the perspective of relational exchange, while culture-driven aspects have been neglected. Given cultural uniqueness in China, this study develops a research model to explore the effects of key social commerce affordances on swift guanxi dimensions and subsequent purchase intention. Data from 450 agricultural product consumers in social commerce were used in PLS analysis for testing the proposed research model. The results indicate that interactivity, stickiness, and word of mouth exert positive effects on mutual understanding, reciprocal favor, and relationship harmony, to various degrees. In turn, swift guanxi dimensions are determinants of consumers’ purchase intention in social commerce.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879 · Cited by 82,194
Asymptotic Confidence Intervals for Indirect Effects in Structural Equation Models
Sobel, M. E. (1982) · Sociological Methodology · doi:10.2307/270723 · Cited by 12,810
Social Exchange Theory: An Interdisciplinary Review
Cropanzano, R., & Mitchell, M. S. (2005) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206305279602 · Cited by 10,068
Liang, H., Saraf, N., Hu, Q., & Xue, Y. (2007) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/25148781 · Cited by 3,921
Kim, S., & Park, H. (2013) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2012.11.006 · Cited by 1,037
Understanding social commerce: A systematic literature review and directions for further research
Busalim, A. H., & Hussin, A. R. C. (2016) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2016.06.005 · Cited by 369
The applications of social commerce constructs
Shanmugam, M., Sun, S., Amidi, A., Khani, F., & Khani, F. (2016) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2016.01.007 · Cited by 161
Specifying Formative Constructs in Information Systems Research1
Petter, S., Straub, D., & Rai, A. (2007) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/25148814 · Cited by 32
Cited by
How live streaming influences purchase intentions in social commerce: an IT affordance perspective.
Sun, Y., Shao, X., Li, X., Guo, Y., & Nie, K. (2019) · Electronic Commerce Research and Applications · doi:10.1016/j.elerap.2019.100886 · Cited by 1,038
Cheng, X., Bao, Y., Zarifis, A., Gong, W., & Mou, J. (2022) · Internet Research · doi:10.1108/intr-08-2020-0460 · Cited by 300
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Lin, J., Luo, Z., Cheng, X., & Li, L.
- Venue
- Information & Management
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-03
- Volume
- 56
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 213-224
- ISSN
- 0378-7206 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2803904741
- Cited by
- 207
- References
- 8
- FWCI
- 38.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Understanding the interplay of social commerce affordances and swift guanxi: An empirical study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.im.2018.05.009
- The paper
- Lin, J., Luo, Z., Cheng, X., & Li, L. (2019). Understanding the interplay of social commerce affordances and swift guanxi: An empirical study. Information & Management. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2018.05.009
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
