CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 306Big Data and Business IntelligenceBig Data Technologies and ApplicationsInformation Technology Governance and Strategy

Leveraging internet of things and big data analytics initiatives in European and American firms: Is data quality a way to extract business value?

Open access
Côrte-Real, Nadine, Ruivo, Pedro, Oliveira, Tiago·2020·Information & Management
DOI 10.1016/j.im.2019.01.003
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.im.2019.01.003

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 50

  1. Marjani, M., et al., Big IoT Data Analytics: Architecture, Opportunities, and Open Research Challenges. Vol. 5. 2017.
  2. Strong, D.M., Y.W. Lee, and R.Y. Wang, Data quality in context. Communications of the ACM, 1997. 40(5): p. 103-110.
  3. Cai, L. and Y. Zhu, The challenges of data quality and data quality assessment in the big data era. Data Science Journal, 2015. 14.
  4. Moore, S. 'Dirty Data' is a Business Problem, Not an IT Problem, Says Gartner. Press Release 2007 21st August 2017]; Available from: http://www.gartner.com/newsroom/id/501733.
  5. Slone, J.P., Information quality strategy: An empirical investigation of the relationship between information quality improvements and organizational outcomes. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Capella University, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA, 2006.
  6. Setia, P., V. Venkatesh, and S. Joglekar, Leveraging digital technologies: How information quality leads to localized capabilities and customer service performance. MIS Quarterly, 2013. 37(2).
  7. Porter, M.E. and V.E. Millar, How information gives you competitive advantage. 1985, Harvard Business Review Juli/August.
  8. Riggins, F.J. and S.F. Wamba. Research directions on the adoption, usage, and impact of the internet of things through the use of big data analytics. in System Sciences (HICSS), 2015 48th Hawaii International Conference on. 2015. IEEE.
  9. Mikalef, P., et al. Big data analytics capability: antecedents and business value. in Proceedings of the 21st Pacific Asia conference on information systems (PACIS). 2017.
  10. Ji-fan Ren, S., et al., Modelling quality dynamics, business value and firm performance in a big data analytics environment. International Journal of Production Research, 2017. 55(17): p. 5011-5026.
  11. Wamba, S.F. and S. Akter. Big data analytics for supply chain management: A literature review and research agenda. in Workshop on Enterprise and Organizational Modeling and Simulation. 2015. Springer.
  12. Wamba, S.F., et al., How 'big data' can make big impact: Findings from a systematic review and a longitudinal case study. International Journal of Production Economics, 2015. 165: p. 234-246.
  13. Chen, Y., et al., IT capability and organizational performance: the roles of business process agility and environmental factors. European Journal of Information Systems, 2014. 23(3): p. 326-342.
  14. Mikalef, P., et al., Big data analytics capabilities: a systematic literature review and research agenda. Information Systems and e-Business Management, 2017: p. 1-32.
  15. Gunasekaran, A., et al., Big data and predictive analytics for supply chain and organizational performance. Journal of Business Research, 2017. 70: p. 308-317.
  16. Madakam, S., R. Ramaswamy, and S. Tripathi, Internet of Things (IoT): A literature review. Journal of Computer and Communications, 2015. 3(05): p. 164.
  17. Perera, C., et al., Sensing as a service model for smart cities supported by internet of things. Transactions on Emerging Telecommunications Technologies, 2014. 25(1): p. 81- 93.
  18. Chen, F., et al., Data mining for the internet of things: literature review and challenges. International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks, 2015.
  19. Kwon, O., N. Lee, and B. Shin, Data quality management, data usage experience and acquisition intention of big data analytics. International Journal of Information Management, 2014. 34(3): p. 387-394.
  20. Drnevich, P.L. and D.C. Croson, Information technology and business-level strategy: Toward an integrated theoretical perspective. Mis Quarterly, 2013. 37(2).
  21. Melville, N., K. Kraemer, and V. Gurbaxani, Information Technology and Organizational Performance: An Integrative Model of IT Business Value. MIS Quarterly, 2004. 28(2): p. 283-322.
  22. Soh, C. and M.L. Markus. How IT creates business value: a process theory synthesis. in International Conference of Information Systems. 1995. ICIS Proceedings.
  23. Wang, C.L. and P.K. Ahmed, Dynamic capabilities: A review and research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 2007. 9(1): p. 31-51.
  24. Corte Real, N., T. Oliveira, and P. Ruivo, Understanding the hidden value of business intelligence and analytics (BI&A), in Twentieth American Conference of Information Systems. 2014: Savannah, Georgia.
  25. Nonaka, I., The Knowledge-Creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation. 1995: Oxford University Press.
  26. Xu, Z., G.L. Frankwick, and E. Ramirez, Effects of big data analytics and traditional marketing analytics on new product success: A knowledge fusion perspective. Journal of Business Research, 2015.
  27. Nonaka, I. and H. Takeuchi, The knowledge-creating company: How Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. 1995: Oxford university press.
  28. Zack, M.H., Managing codified knowledge. Sloan management review, 1999. 40(4): p. 45.
  29. Bharadwaj, A., et al., Digital business strategy: toward a next generation of insights. MIS Quarterly, 2013. 37(2).
  30. Ambrosini, V. and C. Bowman, What are dynamic capabilities and are they a useful construct in strategic management? International Journal of Management Reviews, 2009. 11(1): p. 29-49.
  31. Karimi, J., T.M. Somers, and A. Bhattacherjee, The role of information systems resources in ERP capability building and business process outcomes. Journal of Management Information Systems, 2007. 24(2): p. 221-260.
  32. Helfat, C.E. and M.A. Peteraf, The dynamic resource-based view: Capability lifecycles. Strategic management journal, 2003. 24(10): p. 997-1010.
  33. Helfat, C.E., et al., Dynamic capabilities: Understanding strategic change in organizations. 2009: John Wiley & Sons.
  34. Teece, D.J., G. Pisano, and A. Shuen, Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 1997. 18(7): p. 509-533.
  35. Eisenhardt, K.M. and J.A. Martin, Dynamic capabilities: what are they? Strategic Management Journal, 2000. 21(10-11): p. 1105-1121.
  36. Gorla, N., T.M. Somers, and B. Wong, Organizational impact of system quality, information quality, and service quality. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 2010. 19(3): p. 207-228.
  37. Shanks, G. and R. Sharma, Creating value from business analytics systems: The impact of strategy, in 15th Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems: Quality Research in Pacific, PACIS 2011. 2011: Queensland: Queensland University of Technology. p. 1- 12.
  38. Ringle, C.M., M. Sarstedt, and D. Straub, A critical look at the use of PLS-SEM in MIS Quarterly. MIS Quarterly (MISQ), 2012. 36(1).
  39. García-Morales, V.J., M.M. Jiménez-Barrionuevo, and L. Gutiérrez-Gutiérrez, Transformational leadership influence on organizational performance through organizational learning and innovation. Journal of business research, 2012. 65(7): p. 1040-1050.
  40. Menguc, B. and S. Auh, Creating a firm-level dynamic capability through capitalizing on market orientation and innovativeness. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 2006. 34(1): p. 63-73.
  41. Drnevich, P.L. and A.P. Kriauciunas, Clarifying the conditions and limits of the contributions of ordinary and dynamic capabilities to relative firm performance. Strategic Management Journal, 2011. 32(3): p. 254-279.
  42. Plattner, H. and B. Leukert, The in-memory revolution: how SAP HANA enables business of the future. 2015: Springer.
  43. Ryans, A.B., Estimating consumer preferences for a new durable brand in an established product class. Journal of Marketing Research, 1974: p. 434-443.
  44. Dillman, D.A., Mail and Internet surveys: The tailored design method--2007 Update with new Internet, visual, and mixed-mode guide. 2011: John Wiley & Sons.
  45. Hair, J.F., C.M. Ringle, and M. Sarstedt, PLS-SEM: Indeed a silver bullet. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 2011. 19(2): p. 139-152.
  46. Hair Jr, J.F., et al., A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS- SEM). 2013: Sage Publications. 103.
  47. Cavanillas, J.M., E. Curry, and W. Wahlster, New Horizons for a Data-Driven Economy: A Roadmap for Usage and Exploitation of Big Data in Europe. 2016: Springer. 108.
  48. Xiang, J.Y., S. Lee, and J.K. Kim, Data quality and firm performance: empirical evidence from the Korean financial industry. Journal of Information Technology and Management, 2013. 14(1): p. 59-65. 110.
  49. Cepeda, G. and D. Vera, Dynamic capabilities and operational capabilities: A knowledge management perspective. Journal of business research, 2007. 60(5): p. 426-437. 111.
  50. Wixom, B.H. and P.A. Todd, A theoretical integration of user satisfaction and technology acceptance. Information systems research, 2005. 16(1): p. 85-102. 117. Ravichandran, T., C. Lertwongsatien, and C. LERTWONGSATIEN, Effect of information systems resources and capabilities on firm performance: A resource-based perspective. Journal of management information systems, 2005. 21(4): p. 237-276. 118. Veríssimo, J. and T. Lacerda, Does integrity matter for CSR practice in organizations? The mediating role of transformational leadership. Business Ethics: A European Review, 2015. 24(1): p. 34-51.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Côrte-Real, N., Ruivo, P., & Oliveira, T.
Affiliations
Universidade Nova de Lisboa (PT)
Corresponding author
Côrte-Real, Nadine
ORCID
Venue
Information & Management
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-01
Volume
57
Issue
1
Pages
103141
ISSN
0378-7206 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.im.2019.01.003
OpenAlex
W2909681541
Cited by
306
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 22 · 2025: 40 · 2024: 52 · 2023: 58 · 2022: 60 · 2021: 33 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 8
FWCI
44.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Information & Management (publishedVersion)
  • Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Big Data and Business Intelligence
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Big Data Technologies and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Information Technology Governance and Strategy
Keywords
Internet of Things, big data analytics, data quality, business value, competitive advantage, strategic management, European firms, US firms

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review