Cited by 313D Shape Modeling and AnalysisMedical Image Segmentation Techniques3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage

A new method for the registration of three-dimensional point-sets: The Gaussian Fields framework

Boughorbel, Faysal, Mercimek, Muharrem, Koschan, Andreas, Abidi, Mongi·2010·Image and Vision Computing

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.imavis.2009.05.003

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Boughorbel, F., Mercimek, M., Koschan, A., & Abidi, M.
Affiliations
University of Tennessee at Knoxville (US)
Corresponding author
Koschan, Andreas
Venue
Image and Vision Computing
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-01
Volume
28
Issue
1
Pages
124-137
ISSN
0262-8856 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2075922179
Cited by
31
References
44
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 4
FWCI
2.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Image and Vision Computing (publishedVersion)
  • Yildiz Technical University - AVESIS (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Defense
  • U.S. Department of Energy
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › 3D Shape Modeling and Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Medical Image Segmentation Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geology › 3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage
Keywords
Gaussian random fields, energy minimization, convergence region, iterative closest point, local minima, fast Gauss transform, automatic registration

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review