Cited by 126Autonomous Vehicle Technology and SafetyAdvanced Vision and ImagingSmart Parking Systems Research

Computer vision in automated parking systems: Design, implementation and challenges

Open access
Heimberger, Markus, Horgan, Jonathan, Hughes, Ciarán, McDonald, John, Yogamani, Senthil·2017·Image and Vision Computing

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.imavis.2017.07.002

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • 3D IoU is generally used to evaluate 3D bounding box predictions.

    “In general, 3D IoU [18] is used to evaluate 3D bounding box predictions”

    From WoodScape: A Multi-Task, Multi-Camera Fisheye Dataset for Autonomous Driving (2019) · cites this paper as [18]

    Section 4.6, “A note on accuracy” (p. 11), discusses detection and localisation accuracy for automated parking, but does not identify 3D IoU as an evaluation metric. Searches for 3D IoU, intersection over union, and bounding-box evaluation found no passage addressing the claim. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Heimberger, M., Horgan, J., Hughes, C., McDonald, J., & Yogamani, S.
Affiliations
  • Valeo (Germany) (DE)
  • Valeo (Ireland) (IE)
Corresponding author
Yogamani, Senthil
Venue
Image and Vision Computing
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-12
Volume
68
Pages
88-101
ISSN
0262-8856 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2744055783
Cited by
126
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 5
FWCI
6.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Image and Vision Computing (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Autonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Vision and Imaging
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Smart Parking Systems Research
Keywords
autonomous parking, computer vision, autonomous driving, 3D reconstruction, free space detection, vehicle detection, pedestrian detection, camera systems, functional safety, low-cost systems, sensor fusion, ultrasonic sensors, radar

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review