Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 264

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 45 of the 45 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Combinatorial Single-Cell Analyses of Granulocyte-Monocyte Progenitor Heterogeneity Reveals an Early Uni-potent Neutrophil Progenitor

Open access
Kwok, Immanuel, Becht, Etienne, Xia, Yu, Ng, Melissa, Teh, Ye Chean, Tan, Leonard, Evrard, Maximilien, Li, Jackson L.Y., Tran, Hoa T.N., Tan, Yingrou, Liu, Dehua, Mishra, Archita, Liong, Ka Hang, Leong, Keith, Zhang, Yuning, Olsson, Andre, Mantri, Chinmay Kumar, Shyamsunder, Pavithra, Liu, Zhaoyuan, Piot, Cecile, Dutertre, Charles-Antoine, Cheng, Hui, Bari, Sudipto, Ang, Nicholas, Biswas, Subhra K., Koeffler, H. Philip, Tey, Hong Liang, Larbi, Anis, Su, I-Hsin, Lee, Bernett, St. John, Ashley, Chan, Jerry K.Y., Hwang, William Y.K., Chen, Jinmiao, Salomonis, Nathan, Chong, Shu Zhen, Grimes, H. Leighton, Liu, Bing, Hidalgo, Andrés, Newell, Evan W., Cheng, Tao, Ginhoux, Florent, Ng, Lai Guan·2020·Immunity

Abstract

Granulocyte-monocyte progenitors (GMPs) have been previously defined for their potential to generate various myeloid progenies such as neutrophils and monocytes. Although studies have proposed lineage heterogeneity within GMPs, it is unclear if committed progenitors already exist among these progenitors and how they may behave differently during inflammation. By combining single-cell transcriptomic and proteomic analyses, we identified the early committed progenitor within the GMPs responsible for the strict production of neutrophils, which we designate as proNeu1. Our dissection of the GMP hierarchy led us to further identify a previously unknown intermediate proNeu2 population. Similar populations could be detected in human samples. proNeu1s, but not proNeu2s, selectively expanded during the early phase of sepsis at the expense of monocytes. Collectively, our findings help shape the neutrophil maturation trajectory roadmap and challenge the current definition of GMPs.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.immuni.2020.06.005

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 45 references

Cited by

See all 264

Metadata

Authors
Kwok, I., Becht, E., Xia, Y., Ng, M., Teh, Y. C., Tan, L., Evrard, M., Li, J. L. Y., Tran, H. T. N., Tan, Y., Liu, D., Mishra, A., Liong, K. H., Leong, K., Zhang, Y., Olsson, A., Mantri, C. K., Shyamsunder, P., Liu, Z., Piot, C., Dutertre, C.-A., Cheng, H., Bari, S., Ang, N., Biswas, S. K., Koeffler, H. P., Tey, H. L., Larbi, A., Su, I.-H., Lee, B., St. John, A., Chan, J. K. Y., Hwang, W. Y. K., Chen, J., Salomonis, N., Chong, S. Z., Grimes, H. L., Liu, B., Hidalgo, A., Newell, E. W., Cheng, T., Ginhoux, F., & Ng, L. G.
Venue
Immunity
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-08
Volume
53
Issue
2
Pages
303-318.e5
ISSN
1074-7613 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3035965283
Cited by
264
References
45
FWCI
9.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Combinatorial Single-Cell Analyses of Granulocyte-Monocyte Progenitor Heterogeneity Reveals an Early Uni-potent Neutrophil Progenitor. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.immuni.2020.06.005
The paper
Kwok, I., Becht, E., Xia, Y., Ng, M., Teh, Y. C., Tan, L., Evrard, M., Li, J. L. Y., Tran, H. T. N., Tan, Y., Liu, D., Mishra, A., Liong, K. H., Leong, K., Zhang, Y., Olsson, A., Mantri, C. K., Shyamsunder, P., Liu, Z., . . . Ng, L. G. (2020). Combinatorial Single-Cell Analyses of Granulocyte-Monocyte Progenitor Heterogeneity Reveals an Early Uni-potent Neutrophil Progenitor. Immunity. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.immuni.2020.06.005

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.