Cited by 695COVID-19 diagnosis using AIAdvanced Neural Network ApplicationsRadiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging

A modified deep convolutional neural network for detecting COVID-19 and pneumonia from chest X-ray images based on the concatenation of Xception and ResNet50V2

Open access
Rahimzadeh, Mohammad, Attar, Abolfazl·2020·Informatics in Medicine Unlocked

Abstract

In this paper, we have trained several deep convolutional networks with introduced training techniques for classifying X-ray images into three classes: normal, pneumonia, and COVID-19, based on two open-source datasets. Our data contains 180 X-ray images that belong to persons infected with COVID-19, and we attempted to apply methods to achieve the best possible results. In this research, we introduce some training techniques that help the network learn better when we have an unbalanced dataset (fewer cases of COVID-19 along with more cases from other classes). We also propose a neural network that is a concatenation of the Xception and ResNet50V2 networks. This network achieved the best accuracy by utilizing multiple features extracted by two robust networks. For evaluating our network, we have tested it on 11302 images to report the actual accuracy achievable in real circumstances. The average accuracy of the proposed network for detecting COVID-19 cases is 99.50%, and the overall average accuracy for all classes is 91.4%.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.imu.2020.100360

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The suggested Xception transformation approach achieves extra learning efficiency and better performance but does not minimize the number of parameters.

    “Conversely, the suggested Xception transformation approach achieves extra learning efficiency and better performance but does not minimize the number of parameters [126, 127].”

    From Review of deep learning: concepts, CNN architectures, challenges, applications, future directions (2021) · cites this paper as [127]

    The Methodology (Training phase; page unavailable) says the concatenation of Xception and ResNet50V2 improved accuracy and had more parameters than either network alone. It does not establish greater learning efficiency for the Xception approach: the passage attributes increased training efficiency to data augmentation, and the reported performance gain belongs to the concatenated network rather than Xception alone. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. [8]An P. Chen H. Jiang X. Su J. Xiao Y. Ding Y. Ren H. Ji M. Chen Y. Chen W. Clinical features of 2019 novel coronavirus pneumonia presented gastrointestinal symptoms but without fever onset 2020 [arxiv]
  2. [9]Song F. Shi N. Shan F. Zhang Z. Shen J. Lu H. Ling Y. Jiang Y. Shi Y. Emerging 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-ncov) pneumonia Radiology 2020 200274 PMC8906333 33196374
  3. [20]Li L. Qin L. Xu Z. Yin Y. Wang X. Kong B. Bai J. Lu Y. Fang Z. Song Q. Artificial intelligence distinguishes covid-19 from community acquired pneumonia on chest ct Radiology 2020 200905 32191588 PMC7233473
  4. [21]Ronneberger O. Fischer P. Brox T. U-net: convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation International Conference on Medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention 2015 Springer 234 241
  5. [31]Szegedy C. Liu W. Jia Y. Sermanet P. Reed S. Anguelov D. Going deeper with convolutions 2015 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) Boston, MA, 2015, 1 9
  6. [33]Deng J. Dong W. Socher R. Li L.-J. Li K. Fei-Fei L. Ima- genet: a large-scale hierarchical image database 2009 IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition 2009 Ieee 248 255
  7. [36]He K. Zhang X. Ren S. Sun J. Identity mappings in deep residual networks European conference on computer vision 2016 Springer 630 645

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rahimzadeh, M., & Attar, A.
Affiliations
  • Iran University of Science and Technology (IR)
  • Sharif University of Technology (IR)
Corresponding author
Rahimzadeh, Mohammad
Venue
Informatics in Medicine Unlocked
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020
Volume
19
Pages
100360
ISSN
2352-9148 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3017141460
Cited by
695
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 23 · 2025: 63 · 2024: 84 · 2023: 134 · 2022: 170 · 2021: 174 · 2020: 47
FWCI
63.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Informatics in Medicine Unlocked (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › COVID-19 diagnosis using AI
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
Keywords
COVID-19 detection, pneumonia detection, chest X-ray images, Xception, ResNet50V2, hybrid convolutional neural network, class imbalance, transfer learning, medical image classification

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review