Cited by 423COVID-19 diagnosis using AIRadiomics and Machine Learning in Medical ImagingArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education

Improving the performance of CNN to predict the likelihood of COVID-19 using chest X-ray images with preprocessing algorithms

Open access
Heidari, Morteza, Mirniaharikandehei, Seyedehnafiseh, Khuzani, Abolfazl Zargari, Danala, Gopichandh, Qiu, Yuchen, Zheng, Bin·2020·International Journal of Medical Informatics

Abstract

Objective This study aims to develop and test a new computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) scheme of chest X-ray images to detect coronavirus (COVID-19) infected pneumonia.Method CAD scheme first applies two image preprocessing steps to remove the majority of diaphragm regions, process the original image using a histogram equalization algorithm, and a bilateral low-pass filter. Then, the original image and two filtered images are used to form a pseudo color image. This image is fed into three input channels of a transfer learning-based convolutional neural network (CNN) model to classify chest X-ray images into 3 classes of COVID-19 infected pneumonia, other community-acquired no-COVID-19 infected pneumonia, and normal (non-pneumonia) cases. To build and test the CNN model, a publicly available dataset involving 8474 chest X-ray images is used, which includes 415, 5179 and 2,880 cases in three classes, respectively. Dataset is randomly divided into 3 subsets namely, training, validation, and testing with respect to the same frequency of cases in each class to train and test the CNN model.Results The CNN-based CAD scheme yields an overall accuracy of 94.5 % (2404/2544) with a 95 % confidence interval of [0.93,0.96] in classifying 3 classes. CAD also yields 98.4 % sensitivity (124/126) and 98.0 % specificity (2371/2418) in classifying cases with and without COVID-19 infection. However, without using two preprocessing steps, CAD yields a lower classification accuracy of 88.0 % (2239/2544).Conclusion This study demonstrates that adding two image preprocessing steps and generating a pseudo color image plays an important role in developing a deep learning CAD scheme of chest X-ray images to improve accuracy in detecting COVID-19 infected pneumonia.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2020.104284

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • CNN has become the primary tool for automatic COVID-19 diagnosis in many hospitals around the world using chest X-ray images.

    “CNN has become the primary tool for automatic COVID-19 diagnosis in many hospitals around the world using chest X-ray images [256–260].”

    From Review of deep learning: concepts, CNN architectures, challenges, applications, future directions (2021) · cites this paper as [256]

    The Introduction reports that researchers have applied CNN models to detect and classify COVID-19 using chest X-ray images. It does not say CNNs are the primary diagnostic tool in hospitals worldwide; the Conclusion instead calls for further validation of the models. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Image pre-processing using contrast-to-noise ratio, removing irrelevant regions etc. improved the DNN performance.

    “The image pre-processing using contrast-to-noise ratio, removing irrelevant regions etc. improved the DNN performance [267].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Heidari, M., Mirniaharikandehei, S., Khuzani, A. Z., Danala, G., Qiu, Y., & Zheng, B.
Affiliations
  • University of Oklahoma (US)
  • University of California, Santa Cruz (US)
Corresponding author
Heidari, Morteza
Venue
International Journal of Medical Informatics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-12
Volume
144
Pages
104284
ISSN
1386-5056 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3036908895
Cited by
423
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 70 · 2023: 106 · 2022: 109 · 2021: 85 · 2020: 11 · 2012: 1
FWCI
37.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Medical Informatics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
National Cancer Institute
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › COVID-19 diagnosis using AI
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Keywords
COVID-19 pandemic, pneumonia detection, chest X-ray images, computer-aided diagnosis, image preprocessing, histogram equalization, pseudo-color images, transfer learning, convolutional neural networks
MeSH terms
Deep Learning, COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, Algorithms, Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted, Humans, Radiography, Thoracic, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, Neural Networks, Computer

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review