Cited by 6Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and PostpartumChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentAttachment and Relationship Dynamics

Bi-directional effects of depressed mood in the postnatal period on mother–infant non-verbal engagement with picture books

Open access
Reissland, Nadja, Burt, Mike·2010·Infant Behavior and Development

Abstract

The purpose of the present study is to examine the bi-directional nature of maternal depressed mood in the postnatal period on maternal and infant non-verbal behaviors while looking at a picture book. Although, it is acknowledged that non-verbal engagement with picture books in infancy plays an important role, the effect of maternal depressed mood on stimulating the interest of infants in books is not known. Sixty-one mothers and their infants, 38 boys and 23 girls, were observed twice approximately 3 months apart (first observation: mean age 6.8 months, range 3-11 months, 32 mothers with depressed mood; second observation: mean age 10.2 months, range 6-16 months, 17 mothers with depressed mood). There was a significant effect for depressed mood on negative behaviors: infants of mothers with depressed mood tended to push away and close books more often. The frequency of negative behaviors (pushing the book away/closing it on the part of the infant and withholding the book and restraining the infant on the part of the mother) were behaviors which if expressed during the first visit were more likely to be expressed during the second visit. Levels of negative behaviors by mother and infant were strongly related during each visit. Additionally, the pattern between visits suggests that maternal negative behavior may be the cause of her infant negative behavior. These results are discussed in terms of the effects of maternal depressed mood on the bi-directional relation of non-verbal engagement of mother and child.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.infbeh.2010.07.013

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Reissland, N., & Burt, M.
Affiliations
Durham University (GB)
Corresponding author
Reissland, Nadja
Venue
Infant Behavior and Development
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-12
Volume
33
Issue
4
Pages
613-618
ISSN
0163-6383 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2061466305
Cited by
6
References
51
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Locations
  • Infant Behavior and Development (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Durham Research Online (Durham University) (acceptedVersion)
  • Durham Research Online (Durham University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
Keywords
postpartum depression, mother-infant interaction, picture books, bidirectional effects, early childhood
MeSH terms
Child Behavior Disorders, Communication, Female, Fixation, Ocular, Humans, Infant, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Mother-Child Relations, Mothers, Physical Stimulation, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Reading, Touch, Reproducibility of Results, Infant Behavior, Depression, Postpartum

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review