Cited by 726Memory Processes and InfluencesIdentity, Memory, and TherapyAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Mood-congruent recall of affectively toned stimuli: A meta-analytic review

Matt, Georg E., Vázquez, Carmelo, Campbell, W.Keith·1992·Clinical Psychology Review

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0272-7358(92)90116-p

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Matt, G. E., Vázquez, C., & Campbell, W. K.
Affiliations
  • San Diego State University (US)
  • Universidad Complutense de Madrid (ES)
Corresponding author
Matt, Georg E.
Venue
Clinical Psychology Review
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1992-01
Volume
12
Issue
2
Pages
227-255
ISSN
0272-7358 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2070636866
Cited by
726
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 66 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 40 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 37 · 2018: 33 · 2017: 32 · 2016: 39 · 2015: 38 · 2014: 32 · 2013: 29 · 2012: 26
FWCI
2.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Clinical Psychology Review (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Identity, Memory, and Therapy
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
mood-congruent memory, emotional valence, depression, subthreshold depression, self-referential encoding, mood and memory

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review