Cited by 148Attachment and Relationship DynamicsChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research

Maternal sensitivity during distressing tasks: a unique predictor of attachment security

Open access
Leerkes, Esther M.·2011·Infant Behavior and Development

Abstract

The extent to which maternal sensitivity during a non-arousing free play task and during distressing tasks at 6 months predicted infant-mother attachment security was examined. When considered simultaneously, only maternal sensitivity during distressing tasks predicted subsequent attachment security. Infant temperament was unrelated to attachment security.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.infbeh.2011.04.006

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A mother's sensitivity to distress is a better predictor of the child's outcome than her sensitivity to non-distress cues.

    “A mother’s sensitivity to distress has been a better predictor of the child’s outcome than her sensitivity to non-distress cues (Joosen et al., 2012; Leerkes, 2011; Leerkes et al., 2009; McElwain and Booth-Laforce, 2006).”

    From The maternal brain and its plasticity in humans (2016) · cites this paper as Leerkes, 2011

  • A mother's sensitivity to distress may be a better predictor of child outcomes than her sensitivity to non-distress cues.

    “studies suggest that a mother’s sensitivity to distress may be a better predictor of child outcomes than her sensitivity to non-distress cues (Joosen et al., 2012; Leerkes, 2011; Leerkes et al., 2009; McElwain and Booth-Laforce, 2006).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Leerkes, E. M.
Affiliations
University of North Carolina at Greensboro (US)
Corresponding author
Leerkes, Esther M.
Venue
Infant Behavior and Development
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-06
Volume
34
Issue
3
Pages
443-446
ISSN
0163-6383 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2056453039
Cited by
148
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 2
FWCI
8.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Infant Behavior and Development (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • NC Digital Online Collection of Knowledge and Scholarship (The University of North Carolina at Greensboro) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R03HD048691)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
Keywords
maternal sensitivity, attachment security, infant distress, infant-mother attachment, infant temperament, free play, early infancy
MeSH terms
Arousal, Emotions, Female, Humans, Infant, Maternal Behavior, Mother-Child Relations, Mothers, Object Attachment, Play and Playthings, Temperament, Infant Behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review