The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A systematic review of effect size in software engineering experiments
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Cohen, J. (1994) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.49.12.997 · Cited by 4,003
Statistical methods in psychology journals: Guidelines and explanations.
Wilkinson, L., & Task Force on Statistical Inference (1999) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.54.8.594 · Cited by 2,791
Things I have learned (so far).
Cohen, J. (1990) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.45.12.1304 · Cited by 1,781
Meta-Analysis: Recent Developments in Quantitative Methods for Literature Reviews
Rosenthal, R., & DiMatteo, M. R. (2001) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.59 · Cited by 1,780
Practical significance: a concept whose time has come
Kirk, R. E. (1996) · Educational and Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/0013164496056005002 · Cited by 1,778 · cited 1×
“Hence, observed effect sizes must be judged in context [2,9,18,21,35,36,41,42,45].”
Thompson, B. (2002) · Journal of Counseling & Development · doi:10.1002/j.1556-6678.2002.tb00167.x · Cited by 398
Cited by
Systematic Mapping Studies in Software Engineering
Petersen, K., Feldt, R., Mujtaba, S., & Mattsson, M. (2008) · Electronic Workshops in Computing · doi:10.14236/ewic/ease2008.8 · Cited by 3,239
“It is worth noting that three of the reviews we found (Dyb˚a et al. 2006, Hannay et al. 2007, Kampenes et al. 2007) are based on the 103 articles identified in a single of the other studies (Sjøberg et al. 2005).”
Systematic literature reviews in software engineering – A tertiary study
Kitchenham, B., Pretorius, R., Budgen, D., Pearl Brereton, O., Turner, M., Niazi, M., & Linkman, S. (2010) · Information and Software Technology · doi:10.1016/j.infsof.2010.03.006 · Cited by 1,230
(2015) · doi:10.1007/s10664-013-9279-3 · Cited by 273
The effectiveness of pair programming: A meta-analysis
Hannay, J. E., Dybå, T., Arisholm, E., & Sjøberg, D. I. K. (2009) · Information and Software Technology · doi:10.1016/j.infsof.2009.02.001 · Cited by 268
Self-citationTaylor, N., Conner, M., & Lawton, R. (2012) · Health Psychology Review · doi:10.1080/17437199.2010.533441 · Cited by 223
Developing search strategies for detecting relevant experiments
Dieste, O., Grimán, A., & Juristo, N. (2009) · Empirical Software Engineering · doi:10.1007/s10664-008-9091-7 · Cited by 200
Systematic literature reviews in software engineering
Wohlin, C., & Prikladnicki, R. (2013) · Information and Software Technology · doi:10.1016/j.infsof.2013.02.002 · Cited by 120
A systematic review of comparative evidence of aspect-oriented programming
Ali, M. S., Ali Babar, M., Chen, L., & Stol, K.-J. (2010) · Information and Software Technology · doi:10.1016/j.infsof.2010.05.003 · Cited by 89
Tosun, A., Dieste, O., Fucci, D., Vegas, S., Turhan, B., Erdogmus, H., Santos, A., Oivo, M., Toro, K., Jarvinen, J., et al. (2017) · Empirical Software Engineering · doi:10.1007/s10664-016-9490-0 · Cited by 50
Effect sizes and their variance for AB/BA crossover design studies
Madeyski, L., & Kitchenham, B. (2018) · Empirical Software Engineering · doi:10.1007/s10664-017-9574-5 · Cited by 38
Metadata
- Authors
- Kampenes, V. B., Dybå, T., Hannay, J. E., & Sjøberg, D. I. K.
- Venue
- Information and Software Technology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2007-11
- Volume
- 49
- Issue
- 11-12
- Pages
- 1073-1086
- ISSN
- 0950-5849 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2140984588
- Cited by
- 370
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 8.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.