Cited by 120Software Engineering Techniques and PracticesSoftware Engineering ResearchAdvanced Software Engineering Methodologies

Systematic literature reviews in software engineering

Wohlin, Claes, Prikladnicki, Rafael·2013·Information and Software Technology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.infsof.2013.02.002

Cites

71 of 71 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 72 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wohlin, C., & Prikladnicki, R.
Affiliations
  • Blekinge Institute of Technology (SE)
  • Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (BR)
Corresponding author
Wohlin, Claes
Venue
Information and Software Technology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-06
Volume
55
Issue
6
Pages
919-920
ISSN
0950-5849 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1986521450
Cited by
120
References
72
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 8
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Information and Software Technology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Software Engineering Techniques and Practices
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Software Engineering Research
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Advanced Software Engineering Methodologies
Keywords
software documentation, continuous software development, Agile, lean manufacturing, DevOps, documentation practices, documentation tools, architectural framework, knowledge transfer, informal communication

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review