Cited by 506Software Engineering Techniques and PracticesHuman Behavior and MotivationJob Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior

Motivation in software engineering: A systematic literature review

Open access
Beecham, Sarah, Baddoo, Nathan, Hall, Tracy, Robinson, Hugh, Sharp, Helen·2008·Information and Software Technology

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.infsof.2007.09.004

Cites

122 of 122 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 24

  1. [3]3. BEECHAM, S., BADDOO, N., et al. (2006). Protocol of a Systematic Literature Review of Motivation in Software Engineering, Technical Report No. 452 School of Computer Science, Faculty of Engineering and Information Sciences, University of Hertfordshire.
  2. [11]11. COUGER, J. D. (1992). Comparison of motivation norms for programmer /analysts in the Pacific Rim and the U.S International Journal of Information Systems 1 (3): 16-30.
  3. [15]15. COUGER, J. D. and MCINTYRE, S. C. (1987). Motivating norms for artifical intelligence personnel, Proceedings of the Twentieth Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences 1987. Hawaii Int. Conference Syst. Sci. 1987: 370-4 vol.
  4. [16]16. COUGER, J. D. and ZAWACKI, R. A. (1978). What motivates DP professionals?, Datamation 24 (9): 116.
  5. [23]23. GARZA, A. I., LUNCE, S. E., et al. (2003). Career anchors of Hispanic information systems professionals, Proceedings -Annual Meeting of the Decision Sciences Institute: 1067-1072. Decision Sciences Institute.
  6. [25]25. IM, J. H. and HARTMAN, S. (1990). Rethinking the issue of whether IS people are different from non-IS people, MIS Quarterly 14 (1): 1-2. JSTOR.
  7. [32]32. MYERS, M. E. (1992). The information systems profession and the information systems professional -fit or misfit? Proceedings of the 1992 ACM SIGCPR conference on computer personnel research Cincinnati, Ohio: 350-351 (Ed. Al Lederer).
  8. [44]44. Garza, A.I., S.E. Lunce, and B. Maniam, Career anchors of Hispanic information systems professionals. Proceedings - Annual Meeting of the Decision Sciences Institute, 2003: p. 1067-1072.
  9. [46]46. Darcy, D.P. and M. Ma, Exploring Individual Characteristics and Programming Performance: Implications for Programmer Selection. IEEE International Conference on System Sciences, 2005. HICSS '05. Proceedings of the 38th Annual Hawaii (03-06 Jan. 2005), 2005: p. 314a-314a.
  10. [48]48. Ferratt, T.W. and L.E. Short, Are information systems people different: an investigation of motivational differences. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 1986. 10(4): p. 377-87.
  11. [53]53. Couger, J.D., Comparison of motivating environments for programmer/analysts and programmers in the US, Israel and Singapore. System Sciences, 1989. Vol.IV: Emerging Technologies and Applications Track, Proceedings of the Twenty- Second Annual Hawaii International Conference on, 1989. 4: p. 316-323 vol.4.
  12. [56]56. Couger, J.D. and A. Ishikawa, Comparing motivation of Japanese computer personnel versus these of the United States. System Sciences, 1995. Vol. IV. Proceedings of the Twenty-Eighth Hawaii International Conference on, 1995. 4: p. 1012-1019 vol.
  13. [57]57. Couger, J.D. and S.C. McIntyre, Motivating norms for artifical intelligence personnel. Proceedings of the Twentieth Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences 1987. Hawaii Int. Conference Syst. Sci. 1987, 1987: p. 370-4 vol.
  14. [60]60. Capretz, L.F., Personality types in software engineering. International Journal of Human Computer Studies, 2003. 58(2): p. 207-214.
  15. [67]67. Enns, H.G., T.W. Ferratt, and J. Prasad, Beyond Stereotypes of IT Professionals: Implications for IT HR Practices. COMMUNICATIONS OF THE ACM, 2006. 49(4): p. 106-109.
  16. [80]80. Couger, D.J. and S.C. McIntyre, Motivation Norms of Knowledge Engineers compared to those of Software Engineers. Journal of Management Information Systems, 1987-1978. 4(3): p. 82-93.
  17. [81]81. Im, J.H. and S. Hartman, Rethinking the issue of whether IS people are different from non-IS people. MIS Quarterly, 1990. 14(1): p. 1-2.
  18. [83]83. Ramachandran, S. and S.V. Rao, An effort towards identifying occupational culture among information systems professionals. Proceedings of the 2006 ACM SIGMIS CPR conference on computer personnel research: Forty four years of computer personnel research: achievements, challenges & the future. Claremont, California, USA, 2006: p. 198-204.
  19. [110]110. Procaccino, J.D., et al., What do software practitioners really think about project success: An exploratory study. Journal of Systems and Software, 2005. 78(2): p. 194-203.
  20. [116]116. Fujigaki, Y., Stress analysis of software engineers for effective management. Human Factors in Organizational Design and Management -III. Proceedings of the Third International Symposium. North-Holland. 1990, 1990: p. 255-8.
  21. [117]117. Nelson, A.C. and C. LeRouge, Self esteem: moderator between role stress fit and satisfaction and commitment? Proceedings of the 2001 ACM SIGCPR Conference on Computer Personnel Research (San Diego, California, United States), 2001: p. 74-77.
  22. [122]122. Couger, J.D., Comparison of motivation norms for programmer /analysts in the Pacific Rim and the U.S International Journal of Information Systems, 1992. 1(3): p. 16-30.
  23. [123]123. Couger, J.D., Motivators vs. demotivators in the IS environment. Journal of Systems Management, 1988. 39(6): p. 36- 41.
  24. [124]124. Bartol, K.M. and D.C. Martin, Managing Information Systems Personnel: A Review of the Literature and Managerial Implications. MIS Quarterly, 1982. 6(Special Issue): p. 49-70.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Beecham, S., Baddoo, N., Hall, T., Robinson, H., & Sharp, H.
Affiliations
  • University of Hertfordshire (GB)
  • The Open University (GB)
Corresponding author
Beecham, Sarah
Venue
Information and Software Technology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-08
Volume
50
Issue
9-10
Pages
860-878
ISSN
0950-5849 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2072601349
Cited by
506
References
122
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 31 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 39 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 34 · 2017: 33 · 2016: 38 · 2015: 28 · 2014: 38 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 39
FWCI
3.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Information and Software Technology (publishedVersion)
  • Open Research Online (The Open University) (acceptedVersion)
  • University of Hertfordshire Research Archive (University of Hertfordshire) (acceptedVersion)
  • University of Hertfordshire Research Archive (University of Hertfordshire) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EP/D057272/1)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Software Engineering Techniques and Practices
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Human Behavior and Motivation
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
Keywords
motivation, software developers, demotivation, motivation model, career stages, job characteristics, personality, turnover, sick leave, productivity, problem solving, software engineering profession

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review